Judges and courts destabilizing constitutionalism: the brazilian judiciary branch's political and authoritarian character

• Autor(a) principal: Emílio Peluso Neder Meyer
• Data de Publicação: 2018
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFMG
• Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200022860; http://hdl.handle.net/1843/37262; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7500-0705
• topic: Judiciary branch; Constitutional crisis; Unstable constitutionalism; Constitutional courts; Poder judiciário; Direito constitucional; Tribunais constitucionais

Contemporary democracies may confront several instances of exceptions that co-exist with constitutional institutions; they are never free from any risks. This Article relies on recent Brazilian judicial experiences in order to present and highlight how courts and judges, from within the institutional structure, can act as elite actors that endanger the constitutional system, giving it the characteristics of unstable constitutionalism. By presenting the recent political and juridical facts that drove Brazil to constitutional crisis, the work brings not only judicial rulings but also the institutional and corporative structure that served as the main methods of avoiding the judicial reforms that could have led to a true transition from dictatorship to democracy. The conclusion is that the Brazilian courts blocked effective transitional constitutionalism in Brazil, making room for the current unstable constitutionalism.