THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE AND THE PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: THE POSITION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3062 |
Resumo: | The precautionary principle is used in situations in which there is no scientific certainty about the safety of an activity or project, as well as the risks and extent of risks which may result from this activity. Therefore, its implementation requires the projects a previous environmental impact assessment. The purpose of this article is to understand how the precautionary principle has been applied in the collegiate decisions of the Superior Court of Justice, specifically when this principle is used as a basis for requiring a previous environmental impact assessment. For this, the judgments of the Supreme Court that deal with this subject were analyzed using the inductive method of approach and the literature review of research techniques and case studies. As a result, it was noted that the application of the precautionary principle held by the Superior Court of Justice has consolidated, especially to reduce the risk of damage, but it still needs improvements to fully achieve the purpose for which it is intended. |
id |
CONPEDI-34_0bf54145c80cc40a263df7653878d8ec |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3062 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-34 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE AND THE PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: THE POSITION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICEO PRINCÍPIO DA PRECAUÇÃO E A AVALIAÇÃO PRÉVIA DE IMPACTO AMBIENTAL: A POSIÇÃO DO SUPERIOR TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇAPrecautionary Principle. Risk. Environment. Environmental impact. Environmental management.Princípio da precaução; Risco; Meio ambiente; Impacto ambiental; Gestão ambientalThe precautionary principle is used in situations in which there is no scientific certainty about the safety of an activity or project, as well as the risks and extent of risks which may result from this activity. Therefore, its implementation requires the projects a previous environmental impact assessment. The purpose of this article is to understand how the precautionary principle has been applied in the collegiate decisions of the Superior Court of Justice, specifically when this principle is used as a basis for requiring a previous environmental impact assessment. For this, the judgments of the Supreme Court that deal with this subject were analyzed using the inductive method of approach and the literature review of research techniques and case studies. As a result, it was noted that the application of the precautionary principle held by the Superior Court of Justice has consolidated, especially to reduce the risk of damage, but it still needs improvements to fully achieve the purpose for which it is intended.O princípio da precaução é invocado em situações nas quais não haja certeza científica da segurança de determinada atividade ou empreendimento, bem como, dos riscos e da extensão dos riscos que possam advir dessa atividade. Por isso, sua aplicação exige dos empreendimentos uma prévia avaliação do impacto ambiental. O objetivo deste artigo é entender como tem sido aplicado o princípio da precaução nas decisões colegiadas do Superior Tribunal de Justiça, especificamente quando esse princípio é utilizado como fundamento para exigir a avaliação prévia de impacto ambiental. Para isso, foram analisados os acórdãos do STJ que versam sobre essa temática, utilizando-se o método de abordagem indutivo e as técnicas de pesquisa de revisão bibliográfica e estudo de casos. Como resultado, percebeu-se que a aplicação do princípio da precaução realizada pelo STJ vem se consolidando, especialmente para reduzir o risco de danos, mas que ainda precisa de avanços para alcançar completamente os fins a que se destina.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIHartmann, DéboraSouza, Leonardo da Rocha de2017-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/306210.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2017.v16i7.3062Revista de Direito Brasileira; v. 16, n. 7 (2017); 151-1682358-13522237-583Xreponame:Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3062/2792info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-02-17T01:29:47Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3062Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/PRIhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/oairevistardb@gmail.com2358-13522237-583Xopendoar:2018-02-17T01:29:47Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE AND THE PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: THE POSITION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE O PRINCÍPIO DA PRECAUÇÃO E A AVALIAÇÃO PRÉVIA DE IMPACTO AMBIENTAL: A POSIÇÃO DO SUPERIOR TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA |
title |
THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE AND THE PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: THE POSITION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE |
spellingShingle |
THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE AND THE PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: THE POSITION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Hartmann, Débora Precautionary Principle. Risk. Environment. Environmental impact. Environmental management. Princípio da precaução; Risco; Meio ambiente; Impacto ambiental; Gestão ambiental |
title_short |
THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE AND THE PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: THE POSITION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE |
title_full |
THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE AND THE PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: THE POSITION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE |
title_fullStr |
THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE AND THE PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: THE POSITION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE AND THE PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: THE POSITION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE |
title_sort |
THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE AND THE PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: THE POSITION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE |
author |
Hartmann, Débora |
author_facet |
Hartmann, Débora Souza, Leonardo da Rocha de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Souza, Leonardo da Rocha de |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hartmann, Débora Souza, Leonardo da Rocha de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Precautionary Principle. Risk. Environment. Environmental impact. Environmental management. Princípio da precaução; Risco; Meio ambiente; Impacto ambiental; Gestão ambiental |
topic |
Precautionary Principle. Risk. Environment. Environmental impact. Environmental management. Princípio da precaução; Risco; Meio ambiente; Impacto ambiental; Gestão ambiental |
description |
The precautionary principle is used in situations in which there is no scientific certainty about the safety of an activity or project, as well as the risks and extent of risks which may result from this activity. Therefore, its implementation requires the projects a previous environmental impact assessment. The purpose of this article is to understand how the precautionary principle has been applied in the collegiate decisions of the Superior Court of Justice, specifically when this principle is used as a basis for requiring a previous environmental impact assessment. For this, the judgments of the Supreme Court that deal with this subject were analyzed using the inductive method of approach and the literature review of research techniques and case studies. As a result, it was noted that the application of the precautionary principle held by the Superior Court of Justice has consolidated, especially to reduce the risk of damage, but it still needs improvements to fully achieve the purpose for which it is intended. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-04-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3062 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2017.v16i7.3062 |
url |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3062 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2017.v16i7.3062 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3062/2792 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito Brasileira; v. 16, n. 7 (2017); 151-168 2358-1352 2237-583X reponame:Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistardb@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803388906300768256 |