NAVIGATING THROUGH THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE(S)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bravo, Pedro
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Kriterion (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/40367
Resumo: This paper aims to map the different theoretical optionsrelated to the Precautionary Principle (PP). Great part of the literature on it can be systematized by answering to three different questions: is there a basic structure in the PP? If so, in which interpretation of the PP does this structure express itself? Finally, are its damage or knowledge conditions fixed or adjustable? The first question separates realist from non-realist approaches. The second question allows us to discriminate monist, dualist, or pluralist positions in relation to the three interpretations of the PP: decision rule, procedural requirement, or epistemic rule. Finally, the third question distinguishes rigid from non-rigid formulations of the principle. Based on this mapping, one can not only navigate through the different formulations of the PP present both in official documents and in specialized literature, but also deflect some of its common objections, and understand Hans Jonas’ eventual connection with PP. Notwithstanding, this mapping does not capture other important themes attached to PP, which motivates a final distinction between narrow and broader forms of PP.
id UFMG-10_ceeb69826c89ab430f9231f4a4748bed
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/40367
network_acronym_str UFMG-10
network_name_str Kriterion (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling NAVIGATING THROUGH THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE(S)NAVEGANDO PELO(S) PRINCÍPIO(S) DA PRECAUÇÃOPrecautionary PrinciplePhilosophy of ScienceEnvironmental EthicsPrincípio da PrecauçãoFilosofia da CiênciaÉtica ambientalThis paper aims to map the different theoretical optionsrelated to the Precautionary Principle (PP). Great part of the literature on it can be systematized by answering to three different questions: is there a basic structure in the PP? If so, in which interpretation of the PP does this structure express itself? Finally, are its damage or knowledge conditions fixed or adjustable? The first question separates realist from non-realist approaches. The second question allows us to discriminate monist, dualist, or pluralist positions in relation to the three interpretations of the PP: decision rule, procedural requirement, or epistemic rule. Finally, the third question distinguishes rigid from non-rigid formulations of the principle. Based on this mapping, one can not only navigate through the different formulations of the PP present both in official documents and in specialized literature, but also deflect some of its common objections, and understand Hans Jonas’ eventual connection with PP. Notwithstanding, this mapping does not capture other important themes attached to PP, which motivates a final distinction between narrow and broader forms of PP.Este artigo tem como objetivo mapear as diferentes opçõesteóricas relativas ao Princípio da Precaução (PP). Grande parte da literatura sobre ele pode ser sistematizada ao se responder três questões: há uma estrutura básica no PP? Em caso positivo, em qual interpretação do PP tal estruturase expressa? Por fim, suas condições de dano ou de conhecimento são fixas ou ajustáveis? A primeira pergunta separa abordagens realistas daquelas não realistas. Por sua vez, a segunda pergunta permite discriminar posições monistas, dualistas ou pluralistas em relação às três interpretações do PP: regra de decisão, requerimento procedimental ou regra epistêmica. Por fim, a terceira pergunta distingue formulações rígidas do princípio daquelas não rígidas. Com base em tal mapeamento, pode-se não apenas navegar pelas distintas formulações do PP presentes tanto em documentos oficiais quanto na literatura especializada, mas também contornar algumas de suas objeções comuns, e entender a eventual conexão de Hans Jonas com PP. Não obstante, esse mapeamento não captura outros temas importantes relacionados ao PP, o que motiva uma última distinção entre formulações estreitas e amplas do PP.Revista KriterionRevista KriterionKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaRevista Kriterion2023-10-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/40367Revista Kriterion; Vol. 64 No. 155 (2023)Revista Kriterion; Vol. 64 Núm. 155 (2023)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 64 No 155 (2023)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 64 N. 155 (2023)Revista Kriterion; v. 64 n. 155 (2023)1981-53360100-512Xreponame:Kriterion (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/40367/38768Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Kriterionhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBravo, Pedro2023-10-02T23:32:12Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/40367Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterionPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/oairevistakriterion@gmail.com1981-53360100-512Xopendoar:2024-01-24T12:41:31.668388Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv NAVIGATING THROUGH THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE(S)
NAVEGANDO PELO(S) PRINCÍPIO(S) DA PRECAUÇÃO
title NAVIGATING THROUGH THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE(S)
spellingShingle NAVIGATING THROUGH THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE(S)
Bravo, Pedro
Precautionary Principle
Philosophy of Science
Environmental Ethics
Princípio da Precaução
Filosofia da Ciência
Ética ambiental
title_short NAVIGATING THROUGH THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE(S)
title_full NAVIGATING THROUGH THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE(S)
title_fullStr NAVIGATING THROUGH THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE(S)
title_full_unstemmed NAVIGATING THROUGH THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE(S)
title_sort NAVIGATING THROUGH THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE(S)
author Bravo, Pedro
author_facet Bravo, Pedro
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bravo, Pedro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Precautionary Principle
Philosophy of Science
Environmental Ethics
Princípio da Precaução
Filosofia da Ciência
Ética ambiental
topic Precautionary Principle
Philosophy of Science
Environmental Ethics
Princípio da Precaução
Filosofia da Ciência
Ética ambiental
description This paper aims to map the different theoretical optionsrelated to the Precautionary Principle (PP). Great part of the literature on it can be systematized by answering to three different questions: is there a basic structure in the PP? If so, in which interpretation of the PP does this structure express itself? Finally, are its damage or knowledge conditions fixed or adjustable? The first question separates realist from non-realist approaches. The second question allows us to discriminate monist, dualist, or pluralist positions in relation to the three interpretations of the PP: decision rule, procedural requirement, or epistemic rule. Finally, the third question distinguishes rigid from non-rigid formulations of the principle. Based on this mapping, one can not only navigate through the different formulations of the PP present both in official documents and in specialized literature, but also deflect some of its common objections, and understand Hans Jonas’ eventual connection with PP. Notwithstanding, this mapping does not capture other important themes attached to PP, which motivates a final distinction between narrow and broader forms of PP.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-10-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/40367
url https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/40367
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/40367/38768
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Kriterion
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Kriterion
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion
Revista Kriterion
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Revista Kriterion
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion
Revista Kriterion
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Revista Kriterion
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion; Vol. 64 No. 155 (2023)
Revista Kriterion; Vol. 64 Núm. 155 (2023)
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 64 No 155 (2023)
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 64 N. 155 (2023)
Revista Kriterion; v. 64 n. 155 (2023)
1981-5336
0100-512X
reponame:Kriterion (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Kriterion (Online)
collection Kriterion (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistakriterion@gmail.com
_version_ 1799711183434940416