NAVIGATING THROUGH THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE(S)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Kriterion (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/40367 |
Resumo: | This paper aims to map the different theoretical optionsrelated to the Precautionary Principle (PP). Great part of the literature on it can be systematized by answering to three different questions: is there a basic structure in the PP? If so, in which interpretation of the PP does this structure express itself? Finally, are its damage or knowledge conditions fixed or adjustable? The first question separates realist from non-realist approaches. The second question allows us to discriminate monist, dualist, or pluralist positions in relation to the three interpretations of the PP: decision rule, procedural requirement, or epistemic rule. Finally, the third question distinguishes rigid from non-rigid formulations of the principle. Based on this mapping, one can not only navigate through the different formulations of the PP present both in official documents and in specialized literature, but also deflect some of its common objections, and understand Hans Jonas’ eventual connection with PP. Notwithstanding, this mapping does not capture other important themes attached to PP, which motivates a final distinction between narrow and broader forms of PP. |
id |
UFMG-10_ceeb69826c89ab430f9231f4a4748bed |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/40367 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG-10 |
network_name_str |
Kriterion (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
NAVIGATING THROUGH THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE(S)NAVEGANDO PELO(S) PRINCÍPIO(S) DA PRECAUÇÃOPrecautionary PrinciplePhilosophy of ScienceEnvironmental EthicsPrincípio da PrecauçãoFilosofia da CiênciaÉtica ambientalThis paper aims to map the different theoretical optionsrelated to the Precautionary Principle (PP). Great part of the literature on it can be systematized by answering to three different questions: is there a basic structure in the PP? If so, in which interpretation of the PP does this structure express itself? Finally, are its damage or knowledge conditions fixed or adjustable? The first question separates realist from non-realist approaches. The second question allows us to discriminate monist, dualist, or pluralist positions in relation to the three interpretations of the PP: decision rule, procedural requirement, or epistemic rule. Finally, the third question distinguishes rigid from non-rigid formulations of the principle. Based on this mapping, one can not only navigate through the different formulations of the PP present both in official documents and in specialized literature, but also deflect some of its common objections, and understand Hans Jonas’ eventual connection with PP. Notwithstanding, this mapping does not capture other important themes attached to PP, which motivates a final distinction between narrow and broader forms of PP.Este artigo tem como objetivo mapear as diferentes opçõesteóricas relativas ao Princípio da Precaução (PP). Grande parte da literatura sobre ele pode ser sistematizada ao se responder três questões: há uma estrutura básica no PP? Em caso positivo, em qual interpretação do PP tal estruturase expressa? Por fim, suas condições de dano ou de conhecimento são fixas ou ajustáveis? A primeira pergunta separa abordagens realistas daquelas não realistas. Por sua vez, a segunda pergunta permite discriminar posições monistas, dualistas ou pluralistas em relação às três interpretações do PP: regra de decisão, requerimento procedimental ou regra epistêmica. Por fim, a terceira pergunta distingue formulações rígidas do princípio daquelas não rígidas. Com base em tal mapeamento, pode-se não apenas navegar pelas distintas formulações do PP presentes tanto em documentos oficiais quanto na literatura especializada, mas também contornar algumas de suas objeções comuns, e entender a eventual conexão de Hans Jonas com PP. Não obstante, esse mapeamento não captura outros temas importantes relacionados ao PP, o que motiva uma última distinção entre formulações estreitas e amplas do PP.Revista KriterionRevista KriterionKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaRevista Kriterion2023-10-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/40367Revista Kriterion; Vol. 64 No. 155 (2023)Revista Kriterion; Vol. 64 Núm. 155 (2023)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 64 No 155 (2023)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 64 N. 155 (2023)Revista Kriterion; v. 64 n. 155 (2023)1981-53360100-512Xreponame:Kriterion (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/40367/38768Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Kriterionhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBravo, Pedro2023-10-02T23:32:12Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/40367Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterionPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/oairevistakriterion@gmail.com1981-53360100-512Xopendoar:2024-01-24T12:41:31.668388Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
NAVIGATING THROUGH THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE(S) NAVEGANDO PELO(S) PRINCÍPIO(S) DA PRECAUÇÃO |
title |
NAVIGATING THROUGH THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE(S) |
spellingShingle |
NAVIGATING THROUGH THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE(S) Bravo, Pedro Precautionary Principle Philosophy of Science Environmental Ethics Princípio da Precaução Filosofia da Ciência Ética ambiental |
title_short |
NAVIGATING THROUGH THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE(S) |
title_full |
NAVIGATING THROUGH THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE(S) |
title_fullStr |
NAVIGATING THROUGH THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE(S) |
title_full_unstemmed |
NAVIGATING THROUGH THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE(S) |
title_sort |
NAVIGATING THROUGH THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE(S) |
author |
Bravo, Pedro |
author_facet |
Bravo, Pedro |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bravo, Pedro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Precautionary Principle Philosophy of Science Environmental Ethics Princípio da Precaução Filosofia da Ciência Ética ambiental |
topic |
Precautionary Principle Philosophy of Science Environmental Ethics Princípio da Precaução Filosofia da Ciência Ética ambiental |
description |
This paper aims to map the different theoretical optionsrelated to the Precautionary Principle (PP). Great part of the literature on it can be systematized by answering to three different questions: is there a basic structure in the PP? If so, in which interpretation of the PP does this structure express itself? Finally, are its damage or knowledge conditions fixed or adjustable? The first question separates realist from non-realist approaches. The second question allows us to discriminate monist, dualist, or pluralist positions in relation to the three interpretations of the PP: decision rule, procedural requirement, or epistemic rule. Finally, the third question distinguishes rigid from non-rigid formulations of the principle. Based on this mapping, one can not only navigate through the different formulations of the PP present both in official documents and in specialized literature, but also deflect some of its common objections, and understand Hans Jonas’ eventual connection with PP. Notwithstanding, this mapping does not capture other important themes attached to PP, which motivates a final distinction between narrow and broader forms of PP. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/40367 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/40367 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/40367/38768 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Kriterion https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Kriterion https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Kriterion Revista Kriterion Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Revista Kriterion |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Kriterion Revista Kriterion Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Revista Kriterion |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Kriterion; Vol. 64 No. 155 (2023) Revista Kriterion; Vol. 64 Núm. 155 (2023) Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 64 No 155 (2023) Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 64 N. 155 (2023) Revista Kriterion; v. 64 n. 155 (2023) 1981-5336 0100-512X reponame:Kriterion (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Kriterion (Online) |
collection |
Kriterion (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistakriterion@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799711183434940416 |