BALANCING THE PRINCIPLE OF PUBLICITY AND THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN THE INFORMATIONAL SOCIETY: A HERMENEUTICAL CRITIQUE TO THE APPLICATION OF ALEXY’S LAW OF COLLISION IN BRAZIL
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2968 |
Resumo: | The hermeneutical question of the collision between the principle of administrative transparency and disclosure of information and the fundamental right to privacy is renewed in the context of Informational Society, which proposes a redesign of the old problem of the violation of individual freedoms justified by the supremacy of public interest, operated by the widespread use the new information technologies. This paper questions what are the limits of privacy and what are the limits of government disclosure of information. What is the procedure to find those limits? And yet, can one ensure the realization of both? To what extent? In this context, it studies the collision between the fundamental right to privacy and the principle of transparency in public administration, both guarded by the 1988 Federal Constitution. The critique to the application of collision law is illustrated by the Suspension of Writ of Mandamus No. 3902, judged in 2011 by the brazilian Supreme Court and confirmed by the same Court in April 2015. The methodology used is descriptive-analytic, through literature, legislative and documentary research, adopting the theoretical basis of Alexy’s Theory of Fundamental Rights. Finally, it is suggested that the recognition of the right to informational self-determination is a possible solution to the problem of balancing. It is concluded that the proposed solution respects to the greatest extent possible the principles in collision, limiting them only where needed, as the result of a responsible and rational balancing. |
id |
CONPEDI-34_7828870bf4e47bd3c4f5c8b3406c778e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/2968 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-34 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
BALANCING THE PRINCIPLE OF PUBLICITY AND THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN THE INFORMATIONAL SOCIETY: A HERMENEUTICAL CRITIQUE TO THE APPLICATION OF ALEXY’S LAW OF COLLISION IN BRAZILSOPESAMENTO ENTRE O PRINCÍPIO DA PUBLICIDADE E O DIREITO À PRIVACIDADE NA SOCIEDADE INFORMACIONAL: UMA CRÍTICA HERMENÊUTICA À APLICAÇÃO DA LEI DE COLISÃO DE ALEXY NO BRASILCollision Law. Fundamental Right to Privacy. Principle of Transparency and Disclosure of Information. Constitutional Hermeneutics. Right to Informational Self-Determination.Lei de Colisão. Direito Fundamental à Privacidade. Princípio da Publicidade. Hermenêutica Constitucional. Direito à Autodeterminação Informativa.The hermeneutical question of the collision between the principle of administrative transparency and disclosure of information and the fundamental right to privacy is renewed in the context of Informational Society, which proposes a redesign of the old problem of the violation of individual freedoms justified by the supremacy of public interest, operated by the widespread use the new information technologies. This paper questions what are the limits of privacy and what are the limits of government disclosure of information. What is the procedure to find those limits? And yet, can one ensure the realization of both? To what extent? In this context, it studies the collision between the fundamental right to privacy and the principle of transparency in public administration, both guarded by the 1988 Federal Constitution. The critique to the application of collision law is illustrated by the Suspension of Writ of Mandamus No. 3902, judged in 2011 by the brazilian Supreme Court and confirmed by the same Court in April 2015. The methodology used is descriptive-analytic, through literature, legislative and documentary research, adopting the theoretical basis of Alexy’s Theory of Fundamental Rights. Finally, it is suggested that the recognition of the right to informational self-determination is a possible solution to the problem of balancing. It is concluded that the proposed solution respects to the greatest extent possible the principles in collision, limiting them only where needed, as the result of a responsible and rational balancing.A questão hermenêutica da colisão entre o princípio da publicidade administrativa e do direito fundamental à privacidade ganha novos contornos na Sociedade Informacional, na qual se propõe a reformulação do antigo problema da violação da liberdade individual justificada pela supremacia do interesse público, operada pela difusão do uso das novas tecnologias da informação. Questiona-se quais os limites da privacidade e quais os limites da publicidade dos atos da administração. Qual o procedimento para encontrar esses limites? E, ainda, é possível garantir a realização de ambos? Em que medida? Neste contexto, estuda-se a colisão entre o direito fundamental à privacidade e o princípio da publicidade da Administração Pública, ambos resguardados pela Constituição Federal de 1988. A crítica à aplicação da lei de colisão é ilustrada pela Suspensão de Segurança nº 3.902, julgada em 2011 pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) e reiterada pelo mesmo Tribunal no acórdão do Recurso Extraordinário com Agravo nº 652.777, julgado em abril de 2015. Como metodologia, utiliza-se estudo descritivo-analítico, através de pesquisa bibliográfica, legislativa e documental, adotando-se como marco teórico a Teoria dos Direitos Fundamentais de Alexy (2008). Por fim, sugere-se o reconhecimento do direito à autodeterminação informativa como uma nova faceta do direito à privacidade e possível solução ao impasse do sopesamento. Conclui-se que a solução proposta respeita na maior medida possível os princípios em colisão, limitando-os somente onde necessário, como fruto de um sopesamento responsável e racional.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDILima, Gabriela VasconcelosDias, Eduardo Rocha2017-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/296810.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2017.v16i7.2968Revista de Direito Brasileira; v. 16, n. 7 (2017); 5-202358-13522237-583Xreponame:Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2968/2751info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-02-17T01:29:24Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/2968Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/PRIhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/oairevistardb@gmail.com2358-13522237-583Xopendoar:2018-02-17T01:29:24Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
BALANCING THE PRINCIPLE OF PUBLICITY AND THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN THE INFORMATIONAL SOCIETY: A HERMENEUTICAL CRITIQUE TO THE APPLICATION OF ALEXY’S LAW OF COLLISION IN BRAZIL SOPESAMENTO ENTRE O PRINCÍPIO DA PUBLICIDADE E O DIREITO À PRIVACIDADE NA SOCIEDADE INFORMACIONAL: UMA CRÍTICA HERMENÊUTICA À APLICAÇÃO DA LEI DE COLISÃO DE ALEXY NO BRASIL |
title |
BALANCING THE PRINCIPLE OF PUBLICITY AND THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN THE INFORMATIONAL SOCIETY: A HERMENEUTICAL CRITIQUE TO THE APPLICATION OF ALEXY’S LAW OF COLLISION IN BRAZIL |
spellingShingle |
BALANCING THE PRINCIPLE OF PUBLICITY AND THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN THE INFORMATIONAL SOCIETY: A HERMENEUTICAL CRITIQUE TO THE APPLICATION OF ALEXY’S LAW OF COLLISION IN BRAZIL Lima, Gabriela Vasconcelos Collision Law. Fundamental Right to Privacy. Principle of Transparency and Disclosure of Information. Constitutional Hermeneutics. Right to Informational Self-Determination. Lei de Colisão. Direito Fundamental à Privacidade. Princípio da Publicidade. Hermenêutica Constitucional. Direito à Autodeterminação Informativa. |
title_short |
BALANCING THE PRINCIPLE OF PUBLICITY AND THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN THE INFORMATIONAL SOCIETY: A HERMENEUTICAL CRITIQUE TO THE APPLICATION OF ALEXY’S LAW OF COLLISION IN BRAZIL |
title_full |
BALANCING THE PRINCIPLE OF PUBLICITY AND THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN THE INFORMATIONAL SOCIETY: A HERMENEUTICAL CRITIQUE TO THE APPLICATION OF ALEXY’S LAW OF COLLISION IN BRAZIL |
title_fullStr |
BALANCING THE PRINCIPLE OF PUBLICITY AND THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN THE INFORMATIONAL SOCIETY: A HERMENEUTICAL CRITIQUE TO THE APPLICATION OF ALEXY’S LAW OF COLLISION IN BRAZIL |
title_full_unstemmed |
BALANCING THE PRINCIPLE OF PUBLICITY AND THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN THE INFORMATIONAL SOCIETY: A HERMENEUTICAL CRITIQUE TO THE APPLICATION OF ALEXY’S LAW OF COLLISION IN BRAZIL |
title_sort |
BALANCING THE PRINCIPLE OF PUBLICITY AND THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN THE INFORMATIONAL SOCIETY: A HERMENEUTICAL CRITIQUE TO THE APPLICATION OF ALEXY’S LAW OF COLLISION IN BRAZIL |
author |
Lima, Gabriela Vasconcelos |
author_facet |
Lima, Gabriela Vasconcelos Dias, Eduardo Rocha |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Dias, Eduardo Rocha |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima, Gabriela Vasconcelos Dias, Eduardo Rocha |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Collision Law. Fundamental Right to Privacy. Principle of Transparency and Disclosure of Information. Constitutional Hermeneutics. Right to Informational Self-Determination. Lei de Colisão. Direito Fundamental à Privacidade. Princípio da Publicidade. Hermenêutica Constitucional. Direito à Autodeterminação Informativa. |
topic |
Collision Law. Fundamental Right to Privacy. Principle of Transparency and Disclosure of Information. Constitutional Hermeneutics. Right to Informational Self-Determination. Lei de Colisão. Direito Fundamental à Privacidade. Princípio da Publicidade. Hermenêutica Constitucional. Direito à Autodeterminação Informativa. |
description |
The hermeneutical question of the collision between the principle of administrative transparency and disclosure of information and the fundamental right to privacy is renewed in the context of Informational Society, which proposes a redesign of the old problem of the violation of individual freedoms justified by the supremacy of public interest, operated by the widespread use the new information technologies. This paper questions what are the limits of privacy and what are the limits of government disclosure of information. What is the procedure to find those limits? And yet, can one ensure the realization of both? To what extent? In this context, it studies the collision between the fundamental right to privacy and the principle of transparency in public administration, both guarded by the 1988 Federal Constitution. The critique to the application of collision law is illustrated by the Suspension of Writ of Mandamus No. 3902, judged in 2011 by the brazilian Supreme Court and confirmed by the same Court in April 2015. The methodology used is descriptive-analytic, through literature, legislative and documentary research, adopting the theoretical basis of Alexy’s Theory of Fundamental Rights. Finally, it is suggested that the recognition of the right to informational self-determination is a possible solution to the problem of balancing. It is concluded that the proposed solution respects to the greatest extent possible the principles in collision, limiting them only where needed, as the result of a responsible and rational balancing. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-04-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2968 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2017.v16i7.2968 |
url |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2968 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2017.v16i7.2968 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2968/2751 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito Brasileira; v. 16, n. 7 (2017); 5-20 2358-1352 2237-583X reponame:Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistardb@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803388909304938496 |