THE (IN)JUSTICE OF JUDICIAL POWER: THE ECONOMIC OBSTACLE TO ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE SOCIAL RIGHT TO HEALTH

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zaganelli, Juliana
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2959
Resumo: Access to justice is a desire and a right of every citizen. Therefore, the intention of this paper will deal with access to justice, and tease out both obstacles developed by Mauro Cappelletti and Bryant Garth (1988), as the "fourth wave" proposed by Kim Economides (1999). In this particular case, it is demonstrated during the Third Seminar Justice and Numbers, presented on September 23, 2010 by Alexandre dos Santos that 63% of conflicts do not come to justice. Thus, it will be detailed economic obstacle, organizational and procedural access to justice Cappelletti and Garth (1988), and also the fourth wave of Economides (1999), for individuals to know the necessity of realization of rights. To have greater clarity about the discussion of this study, we used the presentation of Alexandre dos Santos, representative of IPEA (Applied Economic Research Institute), about the difficulty of access to justice in Brazil, which is influenced by socioeconomic factors. So the rhetorical question arises that where access to justice emerges as a winner speech putting justice as the essence of the judiciary, while having access to the judiciary is the most complete injustice.
id CONPEDI-34_924cae30a8a27fd2232834f7a93407bf
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/2959
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-34
network_name_str Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling THE (IN)JUSTICE OF JUDICIAL POWER: THE ECONOMIC OBSTACLE TO ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE SOCIAL RIGHT TO HEALTHA (IN)JUSTIÇA DO PODER JUDICIÁRIO: O OBSTÁCULO ECONÔMICO DO ACESSO À JUSTIÇA E O DIREITO SOCIAL À SAÚDEAccess to Justice; Economic Obstacle; Legal Rhetoric.Access to justice is a desire and a right of every citizen. Therefore, the intention of this paper will deal with access to justice, and tease out both obstacles developed by Mauro Cappelletti and Bryant Garth (1988), as the "fourth wave" proposed by Kim Economides (1999). In this particular case, it is demonstrated during the Third Seminar Justice and Numbers, presented on September 23, 2010 by Alexandre dos Santos that 63% of conflicts do not come to justice. Thus, it will be detailed economic obstacle, organizational and procedural access to justice Cappelletti and Garth (1988), and also the fourth wave of Economides (1999), for individuals to know the necessity of realization of rights. To have greater clarity about the discussion of this study, we used the presentation of Alexandre dos Santos, representative of IPEA (Applied Economic Research Institute), about the difficulty of access to justice in Brazil, which is influenced by socioeconomic factors. So the rhetorical question arises that where access to justice emerges as a winner speech putting justice as the essence of the judiciary, while having access to the judiciary is the most complete injustice.Ter acesso à justiça é um desejo e um direito de todo cidadão. Por isso, a intenção deste trabalho será tratar do acesso à justiça, além de destrinchar tanto os obstáculos desenvolvidos por Mauro Cappelletti e Bryant Garth (1988), quanto à “quarta onda” proposta por Kim Economides (1999). No caso em estudo, é demonstrado durante o III Seminário Justiça e Números, apresentado no dia 23 de setembro de 2010 por Alexandre dos Santos, que 63% dos conflitos não chegam à justiça. Desse modo, será pormenorizado o obstáculo econômico, organizacional e processual do acesso à justiça de Cappelletti e Garth (1988), e, também, a quarta onda de Economides (1999), para que os indivíduos saibam a necessidade da efetivação dos direitos. Para se ter uma maior clareza acerca da discussão deste estudo, recorremos a apresentação de Alexandre dos Santos, representante do IPEA (Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica e Aplicada), sobre a dificuldade do acesso à justiça no Brasil, a qual é influenciada por fatores socioeconômicos. Portanto, a retórica surge nesse questionamento em que o acesso à justiça surge como um discurso vencedor colocando a justiça como essência do Poder Judiciário, enquanto ter acesso ao judiciário seja a mais cabal das injustiças.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIZaganelli, Juliana2016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/295910.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2016.v15i6.2959Revista de Direito Brasileira; v. 15, n. 6 (2016); 185-1992358-13522237-583Xreponame:Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2959/2745info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-02-17T01:30:16Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/2959Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/PRIhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/oairevistardb@gmail.com2358-13522237-583Xopendoar:2018-02-17T01:30:16Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE (IN)JUSTICE OF JUDICIAL POWER: THE ECONOMIC OBSTACLE TO ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE SOCIAL RIGHT TO HEALTH
A (IN)JUSTIÇA DO PODER JUDICIÁRIO: O OBSTÁCULO ECONÔMICO DO ACESSO À JUSTIÇA E O DIREITO SOCIAL À SAÚDE
title THE (IN)JUSTICE OF JUDICIAL POWER: THE ECONOMIC OBSTACLE TO ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE SOCIAL RIGHT TO HEALTH
spellingShingle THE (IN)JUSTICE OF JUDICIAL POWER: THE ECONOMIC OBSTACLE TO ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE SOCIAL RIGHT TO HEALTH
Zaganelli, Juliana
Access to Justice; Economic Obstacle; Legal Rhetoric.
title_short THE (IN)JUSTICE OF JUDICIAL POWER: THE ECONOMIC OBSTACLE TO ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE SOCIAL RIGHT TO HEALTH
title_full THE (IN)JUSTICE OF JUDICIAL POWER: THE ECONOMIC OBSTACLE TO ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE SOCIAL RIGHT TO HEALTH
title_fullStr THE (IN)JUSTICE OF JUDICIAL POWER: THE ECONOMIC OBSTACLE TO ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE SOCIAL RIGHT TO HEALTH
title_full_unstemmed THE (IN)JUSTICE OF JUDICIAL POWER: THE ECONOMIC OBSTACLE TO ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE SOCIAL RIGHT TO HEALTH
title_sort THE (IN)JUSTICE OF JUDICIAL POWER: THE ECONOMIC OBSTACLE TO ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE SOCIAL RIGHT TO HEALTH
author Zaganelli, Juliana
author_facet Zaganelli, Juliana
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zaganelli, Juliana
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Access to Justice; Economic Obstacle; Legal Rhetoric.
topic Access to Justice; Economic Obstacle; Legal Rhetoric.
description Access to justice is a desire and a right of every citizen. Therefore, the intention of this paper will deal with access to justice, and tease out both obstacles developed by Mauro Cappelletti and Bryant Garth (1988), as the "fourth wave" proposed by Kim Economides (1999). In this particular case, it is demonstrated during the Third Seminar Justice and Numbers, presented on September 23, 2010 by Alexandre dos Santos that 63% of conflicts do not come to justice. Thus, it will be detailed economic obstacle, organizational and procedural access to justice Cappelletti and Garth (1988), and also the fourth wave of Economides (1999), for individuals to know the necessity of realization of rights. To have greater clarity about the discussion of this study, we used the presentation of Alexandre dos Santos, representative of IPEA (Applied Economic Research Institute), about the difficulty of access to justice in Brazil, which is influenced by socioeconomic factors. So the rhetorical question arises that where access to justice emerges as a winner speech putting justice as the essence of the judiciary, while having access to the judiciary is the most complete injustice.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2959
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2016.v15i6.2959
url https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2959
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2016.v15i6.2959
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2959/2745
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Direito Brasileira; v. 15, n. 6 (2016); 185-199
2358-1352
2237-583X
reponame:Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
collection Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistardb@gmail.com
_version_ 1803388906287136768