THE (IN)JUSTICE OF JUDICIAL POWER: THE ECONOMIC OBSTACLE TO ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE SOCIAL RIGHT TO HEALTH
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2959 |
Resumo: | Access to justice is a desire and a right of every citizen. Therefore, the intention of this paper will deal with access to justice, and tease out both obstacles developed by Mauro Cappelletti and Bryant Garth (1988), as the "fourth wave" proposed by Kim Economides (1999). In this particular case, it is demonstrated during the Third Seminar Justice and Numbers, presented on September 23, 2010 by Alexandre dos Santos that 63% of conflicts do not come to justice. Thus, it will be detailed economic obstacle, organizational and procedural access to justice Cappelletti and Garth (1988), and also the fourth wave of Economides (1999), for individuals to know the necessity of realization of rights. To have greater clarity about the discussion of this study, we used the presentation of Alexandre dos Santos, representative of IPEA (Applied Economic Research Institute), about the difficulty of access to justice in Brazil, which is influenced by socioeconomic factors. So the rhetorical question arises that where access to justice emerges as a winner speech putting justice as the essence of the judiciary, while having access to the judiciary is the most complete injustice. |
id |
CONPEDI-34_924cae30a8a27fd2232834f7a93407bf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/2959 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-34 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE (IN)JUSTICE OF JUDICIAL POWER: THE ECONOMIC OBSTACLE TO ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE SOCIAL RIGHT TO HEALTHA (IN)JUSTIÇA DO PODER JUDICIÁRIO: O OBSTÁCULO ECONÔMICO DO ACESSO À JUSTIÇA E O DIREITO SOCIAL À SAÚDEAccess to Justice; Economic Obstacle; Legal Rhetoric.Access to justice is a desire and a right of every citizen. Therefore, the intention of this paper will deal with access to justice, and tease out both obstacles developed by Mauro Cappelletti and Bryant Garth (1988), as the "fourth wave" proposed by Kim Economides (1999). In this particular case, it is demonstrated during the Third Seminar Justice and Numbers, presented on September 23, 2010 by Alexandre dos Santos that 63% of conflicts do not come to justice. Thus, it will be detailed economic obstacle, organizational and procedural access to justice Cappelletti and Garth (1988), and also the fourth wave of Economides (1999), for individuals to know the necessity of realization of rights. To have greater clarity about the discussion of this study, we used the presentation of Alexandre dos Santos, representative of IPEA (Applied Economic Research Institute), about the difficulty of access to justice in Brazil, which is influenced by socioeconomic factors. So the rhetorical question arises that where access to justice emerges as a winner speech putting justice as the essence of the judiciary, while having access to the judiciary is the most complete injustice.Ter acesso à justiça é um desejo e um direito de todo cidadão. Por isso, a intenção deste trabalho será tratar do acesso à justiça, além de destrinchar tanto os obstáculos desenvolvidos por Mauro Cappelletti e Bryant Garth (1988), quanto à “quarta onda” proposta por Kim Economides (1999). No caso em estudo, é demonstrado durante o III Seminário Justiça e Números, apresentado no dia 23 de setembro de 2010 por Alexandre dos Santos, que 63% dos conflitos não chegam à justiça. Desse modo, será pormenorizado o obstáculo econômico, organizacional e processual do acesso à justiça de Cappelletti e Garth (1988), e, também, a quarta onda de Economides (1999), para que os indivíduos saibam a necessidade da efetivação dos direitos. Para se ter uma maior clareza acerca da discussão deste estudo, recorremos a apresentação de Alexandre dos Santos, representante do IPEA (Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica e Aplicada), sobre a dificuldade do acesso à justiça no Brasil, a qual é influenciada por fatores socioeconômicos. Portanto, a retórica surge nesse questionamento em que o acesso à justiça surge como um discurso vencedor colocando a justiça como essência do Poder Judiciário, enquanto ter acesso ao judiciário seja a mais cabal das injustiças.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIZaganelli, Juliana2016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/295910.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2016.v15i6.2959Revista de Direito Brasileira; v. 15, n. 6 (2016); 185-1992358-13522237-583Xreponame:Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2959/2745info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-02-17T01:30:16Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/2959Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/PRIhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/oairevistardb@gmail.com2358-13522237-583Xopendoar:2018-02-17T01:30:16Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE (IN)JUSTICE OF JUDICIAL POWER: THE ECONOMIC OBSTACLE TO ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE SOCIAL RIGHT TO HEALTH A (IN)JUSTIÇA DO PODER JUDICIÁRIO: O OBSTÁCULO ECONÔMICO DO ACESSO À JUSTIÇA E O DIREITO SOCIAL À SAÚDE |
title |
THE (IN)JUSTICE OF JUDICIAL POWER: THE ECONOMIC OBSTACLE TO ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE SOCIAL RIGHT TO HEALTH |
spellingShingle |
THE (IN)JUSTICE OF JUDICIAL POWER: THE ECONOMIC OBSTACLE TO ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE SOCIAL RIGHT TO HEALTH Zaganelli, Juliana Access to Justice; Economic Obstacle; Legal Rhetoric. |
title_short |
THE (IN)JUSTICE OF JUDICIAL POWER: THE ECONOMIC OBSTACLE TO ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE SOCIAL RIGHT TO HEALTH |
title_full |
THE (IN)JUSTICE OF JUDICIAL POWER: THE ECONOMIC OBSTACLE TO ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE SOCIAL RIGHT TO HEALTH |
title_fullStr |
THE (IN)JUSTICE OF JUDICIAL POWER: THE ECONOMIC OBSTACLE TO ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE SOCIAL RIGHT TO HEALTH |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE (IN)JUSTICE OF JUDICIAL POWER: THE ECONOMIC OBSTACLE TO ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE SOCIAL RIGHT TO HEALTH |
title_sort |
THE (IN)JUSTICE OF JUDICIAL POWER: THE ECONOMIC OBSTACLE TO ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND THE SOCIAL RIGHT TO HEALTH |
author |
Zaganelli, Juliana |
author_facet |
Zaganelli, Juliana |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zaganelli, Juliana |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Access to Justice; Economic Obstacle; Legal Rhetoric. |
topic |
Access to Justice; Economic Obstacle; Legal Rhetoric. |
description |
Access to justice is a desire and a right of every citizen. Therefore, the intention of this paper will deal with access to justice, and tease out both obstacles developed by Mauro Cappelletti and Bryant Garth (1988), as the "fourth wave" proposed by Kim Economides (1999). In this particular case, it is demonstrated during the Third Seminar Justice and Numbers, presented on September 23, 2010 by Alexandre dos Santos that 63% of conflicts do not come to justice. Thus, it will be detailed economic obstacle, organizational and procedural access to justice Cappelletti and Garth (1988), and also the fourth wave of Economides (1999), for individuals to know the necessity of realization of rights. To have greater clarity about the discussion of this study, we used the presentation of Alexandre dos Santos, representative of IPEA (Applied Economic Research Institute), about the difficulty of access to justice in Brazil, which is influenced by socioeconomic factors. So the rhetorical question arises that where access to justice emerges as a winner speech putting justice as the essence of the judiciary, while having access to the judiciary is the most complete injustice. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-12-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2959 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2016.v15i6.2959 |
url |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2959 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2016.v15i6.2959 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2959/2745 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito Brasileira; v. 15, n. 6 (2016); 185-199 2358-1352 2237-583X reponame:Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistardb@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803388906287136768 |