The Axiom between Work Requirement Excessive Versus the Right to Recreation Worker : Analysis under the Employer Accountability of Optics
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Conpedi Law Review |
Texto Completo: | https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3454 |
Resumo: | Labor relations focused throughout history, legal worker material rights in exchange of services. However, gradually, there was the need for worker appreciation of his human essence, going to glimpse the importance of respecting the intrinsic goods, especially fundamental rights. This study, prepared by the deductive method with doctrinal and jurisprudential basis, justified by observing the gulf between the legal dictates and empirical experience of workers at full exercise of leisure, primarily dealing with the evolution of the recognition of the fundamental rights of workers, passing to the theme of excessive working hours to increase the employer’s profit and subsequently address the responsibility of the latter, when exacerbated working hours subtracts the leisure time of workers. The democratic state imposes the full exercise of citizenship through freedom of every individual’s rights, above all, the social and the right to leisure has become a well constitutionally guaranteed. However, capitalist competition entails the unbridled pursuit of material goods arising from high productivity coming from overwork, which not only harms the health and worker’s life, deprived of living with loved ones, their integration into society and the full exercise of leisure, with autonomy to choose how to enjoy their free time in a dignified manner without the worry or the imposition of produce for their livelihood. Thus, the journey of excessive work affront the fundamental right to pleasure, leaving no room for the realization of the same in violation of the exercise of the worker’s citizenship, and entailing the responsibility of the employer regarding the illicit violates a right of fundamental importance of workers. |
id |
CONPEDI-4_4d45bf4d348cced889715750ae4f9612 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3454 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-4 |
network_name_str |
Conpedi Law Review |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Axiom between Work Requirement Excessive Versus the Right to Recreation Worker : Analysis under the Employer Accountability of OpticsO Axioma entre a Exigência de Trabalho Excessivo Versus o Direito ao Lazer do Trabalhador: Análise sob a Ótica da Responsabilização do EmpregadorWorkerExcessive Working HoursLeisure.TrabalhadorJornada ExcessivaLazer.Labor relations focused throughout history, legal worker material rights in exchange of services. However, gradually, there was the need for worker appreciation of his human essence, going to glimpse the importance of respecting the intrinsic goods, especially fundamental rights. This study, prepared by the deductive method with doctrinal and jurisprudential basis, justified by observing the gulf between the legal dictates and empirical experience of workers at full exercise of leisure, primarily dealing with the evolution of the recognition of the fundamental rights of workers, passing to the theme of excessive working hours to increase the employer’s profit and subsequently address the responsibility of the latter, when exacerbated working hours subtracts the leisure time of workers. The democratic state imposes the full exercise of citizenship through freedom of every individual’s rights, above all, the social and the right to leisure has become a well constitutionally guaranteed. However, capitalist competition entails the unbridled pursuit of material goods arising from high productivity coming from overwork, which not only harms the health and worker’s life, deprived of living with loved ones, their integration into society and the full exercise of leisure, with autonomy to choose how to enjoy their free time in a dignified manner without the worry or the imposition of produce for their livelihood. Thus, the journey of excessive work affront the fundamental right to pleasure, leaving no room for the realization of the same in violation of the exercise of the worker’s citizenship, and entailing the responsibility of the employer regarding the illicit violates a right of fundamental importance of workers.As relações trabalhistas focaram ao longo da história, os bens jurídicos materiais do trabalhador como contraprestação dos serviços. Entretanto, paulatinamente, verificou-se a necessidade da valorização do trabalhador em sua essência humana, passando a vislumbrar a importância do respeito aos bens intrínsecos, sobretudo, aos direitos fundamentais. A presente pesquisa, elaborada pelo método dedutivo com embasamento doutrinário e jurisprudencial, justifica-se pela observação do abismo entre os ditames jurídicos e a experiência empírica dos trabalhadores no pleno exercício do lazer, tratando primeiramente da evolução do reconhecimento dos direitos fundamentais dos trabalhadores, passando para a temática das jornadas excessivas para o aumento de lucro do empregador e, posteriormente, abordará a responsabilidade deste último, quando o exacerbo de horas de trabalho subtrai o tempo destinado ao lazer dos trabalhadores. O Estado Democrático de Direito impõe o pleno exercício da cidadania através da liberdade de todos os direitos do indivíduo, sobretudo, os sociais, e o direito ao lazer passou a ser um bem garantido constitucionalmente. Contudo, a concorrência capitalista enseja a busca desenfreada de bens materiais decorrentes da alta produtividade oriunda de trabalho excessivo, o qual prejudica não somente a saúde e a vida do trabalhador, o priva da convivência com os entes queridos, sua inserção na sociedade e o pleno exercício do lazer, com autonomia de escolher como desfrutar seu tempo livre de forma digna, sem a preocupação ou a imposição de produzir para sua subsistência. Desse modo, a jornada de trabalho excessiva afronta o direito fundamental ao lazer, não deixando espaço para a efetivação do mesmo, violando o exercício da cidadania do trabalhador, e ensejando na responsabilização do empregador no tocante ao ilícito que viola um direito de fundamental importância dos trabalhadores.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI2016-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/345410.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i6.3454Conpedi Law Review; v. 1 n. 6 (2015): DIREITO DO TRABALHO E SEGURIDADE SOCIAL; 61-862448-39312448-3931reponame:Conpedi Law Reviewinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3454/2968Copyright (c) 2016 Regina Célia Pezzuto Rufinoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRufino, Regina Célia Pezzuto2021-08-20T02:10:05Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3454Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireviewONGhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2448-39312448-3931opendoar:2021-08-20T02:10:05Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Axiom between Work Requirement Excessive Versus the Right to Recreation Worker : Analysis under the Employer Accountability of Optics O Axioma entre a Exigência de Trabalho Excessivo Versus o Direito ao Lazer do Trabalhador: Análise sob a Ótica da Responsabilização do Empregador |
title |
The Axiom between Work Requirement Excessive Versus the Right to Recreation Worker : Analysis under the Employer Accountability of Optics |
spellingShingle |
The Axiom between Work Requirement Excessive Versus the Right to Recreation Worker : Analysis under the Employer Accountability of Optics Rufino, Regina Célia Pezzuto Worker Excessive Working Hours Leisure. Trabalhador Jornada Excessiva Lazer. |
title_short |
The Axiom between Work Requirement Excessive Versus the Right to Recreation Worker : Analysis under the Employer Accountability of Optics |
title_full |
The Axiom between Work Requirement Excessive Versus the Right to Recreation Worker : Analysis under the Employer Accountability of Optics |
title_fullStr |
The Axiom between Work Requirement Excessive Versus the Right to Recreation Worker : Analysis under the Employer Accountability of Optics |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Axiom between Work Requirement Excessive Versus the Right to Recreation Worker : Analysis under the Employer Accountability of Optics |
title_sort |
The Axiom between Work Requirement Excessive Versus the Right to Recreation Worker : Analysis under the Employer Accountability of Optics |
author |
Rufino, Regina Célia Pezzuto |
author_facet |
Rufino, Regina Célia Pezzuto |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rufino, Regina Célia Pezzuto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Worker Excessive Working Hours Leisure. Trabalhador Jornada Excessiva Lazer. |
topic |
Worker Excessive Working Hours Leisure. Trabalhador Jornada Excessiva Lazer. |
description |
Labor relations focused throughout history, legal worker material rights in exchange of services. However, gradually, there was the need for worker appreciation of his human essence, going to glimpse the importance of respecting the intrinsic goods, especially fundamental rights. This study, prepared by the deductive method with doctrinal and jurisprudential basis, justified by observing the gulf between the legal dictates and empirical experience of workers at full exercise of leisure, primarily dealing with the evolution of the recognition of the fundamental rights of workers, passing to the theme of excessive working hours to increase the employer’s profit and subsequently address the responsibility of the latter, when exacerbated working hours subtracts the leisure time of workers. The democratic state imposes the full exercise of citizenship through freedom of every individual’s rights, above all, the social and the right to leisure has become a well constitutionally guaranteed. However, capitalist competition entails the unbridled pursuit of material goods arising from high productivity coming from overwork, which not only harms the health and worker’s life, deprived of living with loved ones, their integration into society and the full exercise of leisure, with autonomy to choose how to enjoy their free time in a dignified manner without the worry or the imposition of produce for their livelihood. Thus, the journey of excessive work affront the fundamental right to pleasure, leaving no room for the realization of the same in violation of the exercise of the worker’s citizenship, and entailing the responsibility of the employer regarding the illicit violates a right of fundamental importance of workers. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3454 10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i6.3454 |
url |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3454 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i6.3454 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3454/2968 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Regina Célia Pezzuto Rufino info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Regina Célia Pezzuto Rufino |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Conpedi Law Review; v. 1 n. 6 (2015): DIREITO DO TRABALHO E SEGURIDADE SOCIAL; 61-86 2448-3931 2448-3931 reponame:Conpedi Law Review instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Conpedi Law Review |
collection |
Conpedi Law Review |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1809730144846217216 |