ACCESS TO JUSTICE: AN APPROACH ON THE OPTICS OF DINAMARCO, CAPELETTI AND DIDIER

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nunes dos Santos, Ana Caroline
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Isagoge (Niterói)
Texto Completo: https://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/isa/article/view/107
Resumo: “The process is not an end in itself” (DIDIER). The process is an instrument for the satisfaction of rights and must be accessible to anyone, thus promoting justice and social peace expected by all who take their demands to the Judiciary. The analysis made about access to justice led to the conclusion that often excessive formalism, disinformation and disbelief keep those legitimated from submitting demands to the State for consideration, with the need to strengthen the institution for a lesser discredit and also to use of the social scope by the Judge in the application of the law to concrete cases.
id INDEP-4_f5bc3d71bf0984a7040fd82804cca8c3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.www.telosjournals.com.br:article/107
network_acronym_str INDEP-4
network_name_str Isagoge (Niterói)
repository_id_str
spelling ACCESS TO JUSTICE: AN APPROACH ON THE OPTICS OF DINAMARCO, CAPELETTI AND DIDIERACESSO À JUSTIÇA: UMA ABORDAGEM SOBRE AS ÓTICAS DE DINAMARCO, CAPELETTI E DIDIERJurisdictional effectivenessinstrumentality of processprocedural utilityexcessive formalismefetividade jurisdicicionalinstrumentalidade do processoutilidade processualformalismo excessivo“The process is not an end in itself” (DIDIER). The process is an instrument for the satisfaction of rights and must be accessible to anyone, thus promoting justice and social peace expected by all who take their demands to the Judiciary. The analysis made about access to justice led to the conclusion that often excessive formalism, disinformation and disbelief keep those legitimated from submitting demands to the State for consideration, with the need to strengthen the institution for a lesser discredit and also to use of the social scope by the Judge in the application of the law to concrete cases.“O processo não é um fim em si mesmo” (DIDIER). O processo é um instrumento de satisfação dos direitos e deve ser acessível à qualquer pessoa, promovendo deste modo a justiça e a paz social esperada por todos que levam suas demandas até a apreciação do Poder Judiciário.  A análise feita acerca do acesso à justiça levou a conclusão de que muitas vezes o formalismo excessivo, a desinformação e a descrença afastam os legitimados da submissão das demandas a apreciação do Estado, havendo a necessidade de fortalecimento da instituição para um menor descrédito e também a utilização do escopo social pelo Juiz na aplicação da lei aos casos concretos.Sergio Salles2022-09-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/isa/article/view/107Isagoge - Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences; Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022); 1-6Isagoge - Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences; Vol. 2 Núm. 3 (2022); 1-6Isagoge - Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences; v. 2 n. 3 (2022); 1-62763-7123reponame:Isagoge (Niterói)instname:Publicação independenteinstacron:INDEPporhttps://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/isa/article/view/107/73Copyright (c) 2022 Isagoge - Journal of Humanities and Social Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNunes dos Santos, Ana Caroline2022-12-21T15:04:21Zoai:ojs2.www.telosjournals.com.br:article/107Revistahttps://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/isaPRIhttps://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/isa/oaitelos@telosjournals.com2763-71232763-7123opendoar:2022-12-21T15:04:21Isagoge (Niterói) - Publicação independentefalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ACCESS TO JUSTICE: AN APPROACH ON THE OPTICS OF DINAMARCO, CAPELETTI AND DIDIER
ACESSO À JUSTIÇA: UMA ABORDAGEM SOBRE AS ÓTICAS DE DINAMARCO, CAPELETTI E DIDIER
title ACCESS TO JUSTICE: AN APPROACH ON THE OPTICS OF DINAMARCO, CAPELETTI AND DIDIER
spellingShingle ACCESS TO JUSTICE: AN APPROACH ON THE OPTICS OF DINAMARCO, CAPELETTI AND DIDIER
Nunes dos Santos, Ana Caroline
Jurisdictional effectiveness
instrumentality of process
procedural utility
excessive formalism
efetividade jurisdicicional
instrumentalidade do processo
utilidade processual
formalismo excessivo
title_short ACCESS TO JUSTICE: AN APPROACH ON THE OPTICS OF DINAMARCO, CAPELETTI AND DIDIER
title_full ACCESS TO JUSTICE: AN APPROACH ON THE OPTICS OF DINAMARCO, CAPELETTI AND DIDIER
title_fullStr ACCESS TO JUSTICE: AN APPROACH ON THE OPTICS OF DINAMARCO, CAPELETTI AND DIDIER
title_full_unstemmed ACCESS TO JUSTICE: AN APPROACH ON THE OPTICS OF DINAMARCO, CAPELETTI AND DIDIER
title_sort ACCESS TO JUSTICE: AN APPROACH ON THE OPTICS OF DINAMARCO, CAPELETTI AND DIDIER
author Nunes dos Santos, Ana Caroline
author_facet Nunes dos Santos, Ana Caroline
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nunes dos Santos, Ana Caroline
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Jurisdictional effectiveness
instrumentality of process
procedural utility
excessive formalism
efetividade jurisdicicional
instrumentalidade do processo
utilidade processual
formalismo excessivo
topic Jurisdictional effectiveness
instrumentality of process
procedural utility
excessive formalism
efetividade jurisdicicional
instrumentalidade do processo
utilidade processual
formalismo excessivo
description “The process is not an end in itself” (DIDIER). The process is an instrument for the satisfaction of rights and must be accessible to anyone, thus promoting justice and social peace expected by all who take their demands to the Judiciary. The analysis made about access to justice led to the conclusion that often excessive formalism, disinformation and disbelief keep those legitimated from submitting demands to the State for consideration, with the need to strengthen the institution for a lesser discredit and also to use of the social scope by the Judge in the application of the law to concrete cases.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-09-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/isa/article/view/107
url https://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/isa/article/view/107
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.telosjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/isa/article/view/107/73
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Isagoge - Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Isagoge - Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sergio Salles
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sergio Salles
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Isagoge - Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences; Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022); 1-6
Isagoge - Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences; Vol. 2 Núm. 3 (2022); 1-6
Isagoge - Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences; v. 2 n. 3 (2022); 1-6
2763-7123
reponame:Isagoge (Niterói)
instname:Publicação independente
instacron:INDEP
instname_str Publicação independente
instacron_str INDEP
institution INDEP
reponame_str Isagoge (Niterói)
collection Isagoge (Niterói)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Isagoge (Niterói) - Publicação independente
repository.mail.fl_str_mv telos@telosjournals.com
_version_ 1797042138109706240

Registros relacionados