Substantial and Private Autonomy Equality in Civil Code 2002

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Borges, Roxana Cardoso Brasileiro
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Vasconcellos, Emanuel Lins Freire
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Conpedi Law Review
Texto Completo: https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3475
Resumo: Under the influence of doctrinal current that advocates the constitutionalizsation of civil law, expanded the discussion on the promotional role of the Civil Code of 2002 with regard to substantive equality. In this paper, we try to analyze the instruments offered by the novel encoding for the realization of the aforementioned equality, as opposed to the protection of formal equality erected by the nineteenth-century encodings, and in Brazil, the Civil Code of 1916. Located historically in a statement period prestacionais rights and built based on different coding guidelines of the Brazilian 1916, the new Civil Diploma features, even if timid and insufficient, suitable instruments to the achievement of the aforementioned substantive equality, which are forgotten by significant doctrinal contingent because of valuation in excess of the phenomenon called constitutionalization of law.
id CONPEDI-4_52f8ddf47e13548a1ff5d5af545c5beb
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3475
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-4
network_name_str Conpedi Law Review
repository_id_str
spelling Substantial and Private Autonomy Equality in Civil Code 2002Igualdade Substancial e Autonomia Privada no Código Civil Brasileiro de 2002Civil autonomySubstantial equalityConstitutionalization of lawMethodological syncretismLegal addictions.Autonomia privadaIgualdade substancialConstitucionalização do direitoSincretismo metodológicoDefeitos do negócio jurídico.Under the influence of doctrinal current that advocates the constitutionalizsation of civil law, expanded the discussion on the promotional role of the Civil Code of 2002 with regard to substantive equality. In this paper, we try to analyze the instruments offered by the novel encoding for the realization of the aforementioned equality, as opposed to the protection of formal equality erected by the nineteenth-century encodings, and in Brazil, the Civil Code of 1916. Located historically in a statement period prestacionais rights and built based on different coding guidelines of the Brazilian 1916, the new Civil Diploma features, even if timid and insufficient, suitable instruments to the achievement of the aforementioned substantive equality, which are forgotten by significant doctrinal contingent because of valuation in excess of the phenomenon called constitutionalization of law.Sob o influxo da corrente doutrinária que propugna a constitucionalização do Direito Civil, ampliou-se a discussão sobre a função promocional do Código Civil de 2002 no que diz respeito à igualdade substancial. Neste trabalho, busca-se analisar os instrumentos oferecidos pelo novel codificação para a efetivação da aludida igualdade, em contraposição à proteção da igualdade formal erigida pelas codificações oitocentistas e, no Brasil, pelo Código Civil de 1916. Situado historicamente em um período de afirmação de direitos prestacionais e construído com base em diretrizes distintas da codificação brasileira de 1916, o novo Diploma Civil pátrio apresenta, mesmo que de forma tímida e insuficiente, instrumentos idôneos à concretização da aludida igualdade substancial, que se encontram esquecidos por expressivo contingente doutrinário em virtude da valorização em demasia do fenômeno chamado constitucionalização do direito.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI2016-06-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/347510.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i8.3475Conpedi Law Review; v. 1 n. 8 (2015): DIREITO MERCANTIL, DIREITO CIVIL, DIREITO DO CONSUMIDOR, NOVAS TECNOLOGIAS APLICADAS AO DIREITO ; 18-412448-39312448-3931reponame:Conpedi Law Reviewinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3475/2988Copyright (c) 2016 Roxana Cardoso Brasileiro Borges, Emanuel Lins Freire Vasconcellosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBorges, Roxana Cardoso BrasileiroVasconcellos, Emanuel Lins Freire2021-08-20T02:09:56Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3475Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireviewONGhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2448-39312448-3931opendoar:2021-08-20T02:09:56Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Substantial and Private Autonomy Equality in Civil Code 2002
Igualdade Substancial e Autonomia Privada no Código Civil Brasileiro de 2002
title Substantial and Private Autonomy Equality in Civil Code 2002
spellingShingle Substantial and Private Autonomy Equality in Civil Code 2002
Borges, Roxana Cardoso Brasileiro
Civil autonomy
Substantial equality
Constitutionalization of law
Methodological syncretism
Legal addictions.
Autonomia privada
Igualdade substancial
Constitucionalização do direito
Sincretismo metodológico
Defeitos do negócio jurídico.
title_short Substantial and Private Autonomy Equality in Civil Code 2002
title_full Substantial and Private Autonomy Equality in Civil Code 2002
title_fullStr Substantial and Private Autonomy Equality in Civil Code 2002
title_full_unstemmed Substantial and Private Autonomy Equality in Civil Code 2002
title_sort Substantial and Private Autonomy Equality in Civil Code 2002
author Borges, Roxana Cardoso Brasileiro
author_facet Borges, Roxana Cardoso Brasileiro
Vasconcellos, Emanuel Lins Freire
author_role author
author2 Vasconcellos, Emanuel Lins Freire
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Borges, Roxana Cardoso Brasileiro
Vasconcellos, Emanuel Lins Freire
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Civil autonomy
Substantial equality
Constitutionalization of law
Methodological syncretism
Legal addictions.
Autonomia privada
Igualdade substancial
Constitucionalização do direito
Sincretismo metodológico
Defeitos do negócio jurídico.
topic Civil autonomy
Substantial equality
Constitutionalization of law
Methodological syncretism
Legal addictions.
Autonomia privada
Igualdade substancial
Constitucionalização do direito
Sincretismo metodológico
Defeitos do negócio jurídico.
description Under the influence of doctrinal current that advocates the constitutionalizsation of civil law, expanded the discussion on the promotional role of the Civil Code of 2002 with regard to substantive equality. In this paper, we try to analyze the instruments offered by the novel encoding for the realization of the aforementioned equality, as opposed to the protection of formal equality erected by the nineteenth-century encodings, and in Brazil, the Civil Code of 1916. Located historically in a statement period prestacionais rights and built based on different coding guidelines of the Brazilian 1916, the new Civil Diploma features, even if timid and insufficient, suitable instruments to the achievement of the aforementioned substantive equality, which are forgotten by significant doctrinal contingent because of valuation in excess of the phenomenon called constitutionalization of law.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3475
10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i8.3475
url https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3475
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i8.3475
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3475/2988
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Roxana Cardoso Brasileiro Borges, Emanuel Lins Freire Vasconcellos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Roxana Cardoso Brasileiro Borges, Emanuel Lins Freire Vasconcellos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Conpedi Law Review; v. 1 n. 8 (2015): DIREITO MERCANTIL, DIREITO CIVIL, DIREITO DO CONSUMIDOR, NOVAS TECNOLOGIAS APLICADAS AO DIREITO ; 18-41
2448-3931
2448-3931
reponame:Conpedi Law Review
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Conpedi Law Review
collection Conpedi Law Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com
_version_ 1809730144887111680

Registros relacionados