What's So Democratic in " democratic constitutionalism " ?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira Junior, José Alcebíades de
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Moreira, Pedro da Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Conpedi Law Review
Texto Completo: https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3519
Resumo: The main idea of this paper is to raise questions on the democratic character of “con- temporary constitutionalism”. In this sense, we present the ideas of four renowned scholars and the core of their theses, whose influence – especially in the “Latin world” – is undenia- ble. They are Manuel Atienza, Luigi Ferrajoli, Luis Prieto Sanchís and Gustavo Zagrebel- sky. Among the many differences that characterize them, their accounts have at least one thing in common: enthusiasm for the constitutional project. To that extent, they stress the normativity of the Constitution and the “civilizing feature” of constitutional values. We address several objections to this understanding, taking into consideration the fundamen- tal right to participate on political affairs, including issues related to substantive rights, which require political and moral developments. To do so, we must take seriously the fact of disagreement and the fact of pluralism as elements of the process of protection and realization of fundamental rights. These rights are also subject to a decision-making process.
id CONPEDI-4_d54ff05e56da97591dae5be570d32896
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3519
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-4
network_name_str Conpedi Law Review
repository_id_str
spelling What's So Democratic in " democratic constitutionalism " ?O Que Há de Tão Democrático no “Constitucionalismo Democrático”?ConstitutionalismDemocracyFundamental rightsLegislationDisagreement.ConstitucionalismoDemocraciaDireitos FundamentaisLegislaçãoDesacordo.The main idea of this paper is to raise questions on the democratic character of “con- temporary constitutionalism”. In this sense, we present the ideas of four renowned scholars and the core of their theses, whose influence – especially in the “Latin world” – is undenia- ble. They are Manuel Atienza, Luigi Ferrajoli, Luis Prieto Sanchís and Gustavo Zagrebel- sky. Among the many differences that characterize them, their accounts have at least one thing in common: enthusiasm for the constitutional project. To that extent, they stress the normativity of the Constitution and the “civilizing feature” of constitutional values. We address several objections to this understanding, taking into consideration the fundamen- tal right to participate on political affairs, including issues related to substantive rights, which require political and moral developments. To do so, we must take seriously the fact of disagreement and the fact of pluralism as elements of the process of protection and realization of fundamental rights. These rights are also subject to a decision-making process.A principal ideia deste artigo é questionar o caráter democrático do “constitucionalismo contemporâneo”. Para tanto, apresentamos teses de quatro renomados autores, cuja influência – sobretudo no mundo latino – é inegável. Trata-se de Manuel Atienza, Luigi Ferrajoli, Luis Prieto Sanchís e Gustavo Zagrebelsky. Entre as muitas diferenças que os caracterizam, suas ideias têm um ponto em comum: o entusiasmo pelo projeto constitucional, pela normatividade da Constituição e pelo caráter civilizatório dessa empresa. Nossa pretensão é suscitar uma série de perguntas de matriz democrática – essencialmente sobre a participação política dos membros da comunidade no desenvolvimento do conteúdo moral e político dos direitos fundamentais. Para fazê-lo, é preciso reconhecer o fato do pluralismo e o fato do desacordo como elementos indissociáveis do processo de proteção e efetivação dos direitos fundamentais, que – apenas de modo aparente – restariam subtraídos de um processo decisório.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI2016-06-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/351910.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i14.3519Conpedi Law Review; v. 1 n. 14 (2015): Teoria, Filosofia e História do Direito; 100-1202448-39312448-3931reponame:Conpedi Law Reviewinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3519/3029Copyright (c) 2016 José Alcebíades de Oliveira Junior, Pedro da Silva Moreirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira Junior, José Alcebíades deMoreira, Pedro da Silva2021-08-20T02:09:34Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3519Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireviewONGhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2448-39312448-3931opendoar:2021-08-20T02:09:34Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What's So Democratic in " democratic constitutionalism " ?
O Que Há de Tão Democrático no “Constitucionalismo Democrático”?
title What's So Democratic in " democratic constitutionalism " ?
spellingShingle What's So Democratic in " democratic constitutionalism " ?
Oliveira Junior, José Alcebíades de
Constitutionalism
Democracy
Fundamental rights
Legislation
Disagreement.
Constitucionalismo
Democracia
Direitos Fundamentais
Legislação
Desacordo.
title_short What's So Democratic in " democratic constitutionalism " ?
title_full What's So Democratic in " democratic constitutionalism " ?
title_fullStr What's So Democratic in " democratic constitutionalism " ?
title_full_unstemmed What's So Democratic in " democratic constitutionalism " ?
title_sort What's So Democratic in " democratic constitutionalism " ?
author Oliveira Junior, José Alcebíades de
author_facet Oliveira Junior, José Alcebíades de
Moreira, Pedro da Silva
author_role author
author2 Moreira, Pedro da Silva
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira Junior, José Alcebíades de
Moreira, Pedro da Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Constitutionalism
Democracy
Fundamental rights
Legislation
Disagreement.
Constitucionalismo
Democracia
Direitos Fundamentais
Legislação
Desacordo.
topic Constitutionalism
Democracy
Fundamental rights
Legislation
Disagreement.
Constitucionalismo
Democracia
Direitos Fundamentais
Legislação
Desacordo.
description The main idea of this paper is to raise questions on the democratic character of “con- temporary constitutionalism”. In this sense, we present the ideas of four renowned scholars and the core of their theses, whose influence – especially in the “Latin world” – is undenia- ble. They are Manuel Atienza, Luigi Ferrajoli, Luis Prieto Sanchís and Gustavo Zagrebel- sky. Among the many differences that characterize them, their accounts have at least one thing in common: enthusiasm for the constitutional project. To that extent, they stress the normativity of the Constitution and the “civilizing feature” of constitutional values. We address several objections to this understanding, taking into consideration the fundamen- tal right to participate on political affairs, including issues related to substantive rights, which require political and moral developments. To do so, we must take seriously the fact of disagreement and the fact of pluralism as elements of the process of protection and realization of fundamental rights. These rights are also subject to a decision-making process.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3519
10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i14.3519
url https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3519
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i14.3519
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3519/3029
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 José Alcebíades de Oliveira Junior, Pedro da Silva Moreira
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 José Alcebíades de Oliveira Junior, Pedro da Silva Moreira
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Conpedi Law Review; v. 1 n. 14 (2015): Teoria, Filosofia e História do Direito; 100-120
2448-3931
2448-3931
reponame:Conpedi Law Review
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Conpedi Law Review
collection Conpedi Law Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com
_version_ 1809730144979386368