What's So Democratic in " democratic constitutionalism " ?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Conpedi Law Review |
Texto Completo: | https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3519 |
Resumo: | The main idea of this paper is to raise questions on the democratic character of “con- temporary constitutionalism”. In this sense, we present the ideas of four renowned scholars and the core of their theses, whose influence – especially in the “Latin world” – is undenia- ble. They are Manuel Atienza, Luigi Ferrajoli, Luis Prieto Sanchís and Gustavo Zagrebel- sky. Among the many differences that characterize them, their accounts have at least one thing in common: enthusiasm for the constitutional project. To that extent, they stress the normativity of the Constitution and the “civilizing feature” of constitutional values. We address several objections to this understanding, taking into consideration the fundamen- tal right to participate on political affairs, including issues related to substantive rights, which require political and moral developments. To do so, we must take seriously the fact of disagreement and the fact of pluralism as elements of the process of protection and realization of fundamental rights. These rights are also subject to a decision-making process. |
id |
CONPEDI-4_d54ff05e56da97591dae5be570d32896 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3519 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-4 |
network_name_str |
Conpedi Law Review |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
What's So Democratic in " democratic constitutionalism " ?O Que Há de Tão Democrático no “Constitucionalismo Democrático”?ConstitutionalismDemocracyFundamental rightsLegislationDisagreement.ConstitucionalismoDemocraciaDireitos FundamentaisLegislaçãoDesacordo.The main idea of this paper is to raise questions on the democratic character of “con- temporary constitutionalism”. In this sense, we present the ideas of four renowned scholars and the core of their theses, whose influence – especially in the “Latin world” – is undenia- ble. They are Manuel Atienza, Luigi Ferrajoli, Luis Prieto Sanchís and Gustavo Zagrebel- sky. Among the many differences that characterize them, their accounts have at least one thing in common: enthusiasm for the constitutional project. To that extent, they stress the normativity of the Constitution and the “civilizing feature” of constitutional values. We address several objections to this understanding, taking into consideration the fundamen- tal right to participate on political affairs, including issues related to substantive rights, which require political and moral developments. To do so, we must take seriously the fact of disagreement and the fact of pluralism as elements of the process of protection and realization of fundamental rights. These rights are also subject to a decision-making process.A principal ideia deste artigo é questionar o caráter democrático do “constitucionalismo contemporâneo”. Para tanto, apresentamos teses de quatro renomados autores, cuja influência – sobretudo no mundo latino – é inegável. Trata-se de Manuel Atienza, Luigi Ferrajoli, Luis Prieto Sanchís e Gustavo Zagrebelsky. Entre as muitas diferenças que os caracterizam, suas ideias têm um ponto em comum: o entusiasmo pelo projeto constitucional, pela normatividade da Constituição e pelo caráter civilizatório dessa empresa. Nossa pretensão é suscitar uma série de perguntas de matriz democrática – essencialmente sobre a participação política dos membros da comunidade no desenvolvimento do conteúdo moral e político dos direitos fundamentais. Para fazê-lo, é preciso reconhecer o fato do pluralismo e o fato do desacordo como elementos indissociáveis do processo de proteção e efetivação dos direitos fundamentais, que – apenas de modo aparente – restariam subtraídos de um processo decisório.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI2016-06-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/351910.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i14.3519Conpedi Law Review; v. 1 n. 14 (2015): Teoria, Filosofia e História do Direito; 100-1202448-39312448-3931reponame:Conpedi Law Reviewinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3519/3029Copyright (c) 2016 José Alcebíades de Oliveira Junior, Pedro da Silva Moreirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira Junior, José Alcebíades deMoreira, Pedro da Silva2021-08-20T02:09:34Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3519Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireviewONGhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2448-39312448-3931opendoar:2021-08-20T02:09:34Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
What's So Democratic in " democratic constitutionalism " ? O Que Há de Tão Democrático no “Constitucionalismo Democrático”? |
title |
What's So Democratic in " democratic constitutionalism " ? |
spellingShingle |
What's So Democratic in " democratic constitutionalism " ? Oliveira Junior, José Alcebíades de Constitutionalism Democracy Fundamental rights Legislation Disagreement. Constitucionalismo Democracia Direitos Fundamentais Legislação Desacordo. |
title_short |
What's So Democratic in " democratic constitutionalism " ? |
title_full |
What's So Democratic in " democratic constitutionalism " ? |
title_fullStr |
What's So Democratic in " democratic constitutionalism " ? |
title_full_unstemmed |
What's So Democratic in " democratic constitutionalism " ? |
title_sort |
What's So Democratic in " democratic constitutionalism " ? |
author |
Oliveira Junior, José Alcebíades de |
author_facet |
Oliveira Junior, José Alcebíades de Moreira, Pedro da Silva |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Moreira, Pedro da Silva |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira Junior, José Alcebíades de Moreira, Pedro da Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Constitutionalism Democracy Fundamental rights Legislation Disagreement. Constitucionalismo Democracia Direitos Fundamentais Legislação Desacordo. |
topic |
Constitutionalism Democracy Fundamental rights Legislation Disagreement. Constitucionalismo Democracia Direitos Fundamentais Legislação Desacordo. |
description |
The main idea of this paper is to raise questions on the democratic character of “con- temporary constitutionalism”. In this sense, we present the ideas of four renowned scholars and the core of their theses, whose influence – especially in the “Latin world” – is undenia- ble. They are Manuel Atienza, Luigi Ferrajoli, Luis Prieto Sanchís and Gustavo Zagrebel- sky. Among the many differences that characterize them, their accounts have at least one thing in common: enthusiasm for the constitutional project. To that extent, they stress the normativity of the Constitution and the “civilizing feature” of constitutional values. We address several objections to this understanding, taking into consideration the fundamen- tal right to participate on political affairs, including issues related to substantive rights, which require political and moral developments. To do so, we must take seriously the fact of disagreement and the fact of pluralism as elements of the process of protection and realization of fundamental rights. These rights are also subject to a decision-making process. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3519 10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i14.3519 |
url |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3519 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i14.3519 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3519/3029 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 José Alcebíades de Oliveira Junior, Pedro da Silva Moreira info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 José Alcebíades de Oliveira Junior, Pedro da Silva Moreira |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Conpedi Law Review; v. 1 n. 14 (2015): Teoria, Filosofia e História do Direito; 100-120 2448-3931 2448-3931 reponame:Conpedi Law Review instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Conpedi Law Review |
collection |
Conpedi Law Review |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1809730144979386368 |