Systematic Review of the Literature on Electronic Democracy and Electronic Government

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mezzaroba, Mariana Pessini
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Bier, Clerilei Aparecida
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Conpedi Law Review
Texto Completo: https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3379
Resumo: This article aims, through a systematic literature review, answer the following research question: What are the methods used in articles containing the words e-democracy and e-government and which concepts of these issues? To select the articles used the Scopus database with the keywords AND e-democracy e-government and the temporal filter publications from the 2000s until the month of June 2015. Through filters were selected ten articles that compose the sample of this study. After the analysis it can be seen that the concept of e-government is fairly uniform, while the same is not true of the definition of electronic democracy. In addition, it can be said that the articles are mostly based on qualitative methods which are more scarce the approach of applied research. The few references found evidence the space and the need for further research that could strengthen mainly the study of initiatives and experiences of government and electronic democracy. 
id CONPEDI-4_f6f9ae21c96eef9d00202dc22f949886
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3379
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-4
network_name_str Conpedi Law Review
repository_id_str
spelling Systematic Review of the Literature on Electronic Democracy and Electronic GovernmentRevisão Sistemática da Literatura sobre Democracia Eletrônica e Governo EletrônicoEletronic DemocracyE-democracyElectronic GovernmentE-governmentSystematic review.Democracia EletrônicaE-democracyGoverno EletrônicoE-governmentRevisão sistemática.This article aims, through a systematic literature review, answer the following research question: What are the methods used in articles containing the words e-democracy and e-government and which concepts of these issues? To select the articles used the Scopus database with the keywords AND e-democracy e-government and the temporal filter publications from the 2000s until the month of June 2015. Through filters were selected ten articles that compose the sample of this study. After the analysis it can be seen that the concept of e-government is fairly uniform, while the same is not true of the definition of electronic democracy. In addition, it can be said that the articles are mostly based on qualitative methods which are more scarce the approach of applied research. The few references found evidence the space and the need for further research that could strengthen mainly the study of initiatives and experiences of government and electronic democracy. O presente artigo busca, por meio de uma revisão sistemática da literatura, responder a seguinte pergunta de pesquisa: Quais são os métodos utilizados em artigos que contenham as palavras e democracy e e-government e quais os conceitos destes temas? Para a seleção dos artigos utilizou-se a base de dados Scopus, com as palavras-chave e-democracy AND e-government e o filtro temporal de publicações a partir dos anos 2000 até o mês de Junho de 2015. Através de filtros foram selecionados dez artigos que compõe a amostra deste estudo. Após a análise pode-se perceber que o conceito de governo eletrônico é razoavelmente uniformizado, enquanto que o mesmo não acontece com a definição de democracia eletrônica. Além disso, pode-se afirmar que os artigos são principalmente baseados em métodos qualitativos e que são mais escassos a abordagem de pesquisas aplicadas. As poucas referências encontradas evidenciam o espaço e a necessidade de novas pesquisas que possam aprofundar, principalmente, o estudo de iniciativas e experiências de governo e democracia eletrônica.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI2016-06-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/337910.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i9.3379Conpedi Law Review; v. 1 n. 9 (2015): Direito Mercantil, Direito Civil, Direito do Consumidor, Novas Tecnologias Aplicadas ao Direito; 208-2332448-39312448-3931reponame:Conpedi Law Reviewinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3379/2896Copyright (c) 2016 Mariana Pessini Mezzaroba, Clerilei Aparecida Bierinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMezzaroba, Mariana PessiniBier, Clerilei Aparecida2021-08-20T02:09:52Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3379Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireviewONGhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2448-39312448-3931opendoar:2021-08-20T02:09:52Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Systematic Review of the Literature on Electronic Democracy and Electronic Government
Revisão Sistemática da Literatura sobre Democracia Eletrônica e Governo Eletrônico
title Systematic Review of the Literature on Electronic Democracy and Electronic Government
spellingShingle Systematic Review of the Literature on Electronic Democracy and Electronic Government
Mezzaroba, Mariana Pessini
Eletronic Democracy
E-democracy
Electronic Government
E-government
Systematic review.
Democracia Eletrônica
E-democracy
Governo Eletrônico
E-government
Revisão sistemática.
title_short Systematic Review of the Literature on Electronic Democracy and Electronic Government
title_full Systematic Review of the Literature on Electronic Democracy and Electronic Government
title_fullStr Systematic Review of the Literature on Electronic Democracy and Electronic Government
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review of the Literature on Electronic Democracy and Electronic Government
title_sort Systematic Review of the Literature on Electronic Democracy and Electronic Government
author Mezzaroba, Mariana Pessini
author_facet Mezzaroba, Mariana Pessini
Bier, Clerilei Aparecida
author_role author
author2 Bier, Clerilei Aparecida
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mezzaroba, Mariana Pessini
Bier, Clerilei Aparecida
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Eletronic Democracy
E-democracy
Electronic Government
E-government
Systematic review.
Democracia Eletrônica
E-democracy
Governo Eletrônico
E-government
Revisão sistemática.
topic Eletronic Democracy
E-democracy
Electronic Government
E-government
Systematic review.
Democracia Eletrônica
E-democracy
Governo Eletrônico
E-government
Revisão sistemática.
description This article aims, through a systematic literature review, answer the following research question: What are the methods used in articles containing the words e-democracy and e-government and which concepts of these issues? To select the articles used the Scopus database with the keywords AND e-democracy e-government and the temporal filter publications from the 2000s until the month of June 2015. Through filters were selected ten articles that compose the sample of this study. After the analysis it can be seen that the concept of e-government is fairly uniform, while the same is not true of the definition of electronic democracy. In addition, it can be said that the articles are mostly based on qualitative methods which are more scarce the approach of applied research. The few references found evidence the space and the need for further research that could strengthen mainly the study of initiatives and experiences of government and electronic democracy. 
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3379
10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i9.3379
url https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3379
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i9.3379
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3379/2896
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Mariana Pessini Mezzaroba, Clerilei Aparecida Bier
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Mariana Pessini Mezzaroba, Clerilei Aparecida Bier
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Conpedi Law Review; v. 1 n. 9 (2015): Direito Mercantil, Direito Civil, Direito do Consumidor, Novas Tecnologias Aplicadas ao Direito; 208-233
2448-3931
2448-3931
reponame:Conpedi Law Review
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Conpedi Law Review
collection Conpedi Law Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com
_version_ 1809730144397426688