Systematic Review of the Literature on Electronic Democracy and Electronic Government
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Conpedi Law Review |
Texto Completo: | https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3379 |
Resumo: | This article aims, through a systematic literature review, answer the following research question: What are the methods used in articles containing the words e-democracy and e-government and which concepts of these issues? To select the articles used the Scopus database with the keywords AND e-democracy e-government and the temporal filter publications from the 2000s until the month of June 2015. Through filters were selected ten articles that compose the sample of this study. After the analysis it can be seen that the concept of e-government is fairly uniform, while the same is not true of the definition of electronic democracy. In addition, it can be said that the articles are mostly based on qualitative methods which are more scarce the approach of applied research. The few references found evidence the space and the need for further research that could strengthen mainly the study of initiatives and experiences of government and electronic democracy. |
id |
CONPEDI-4_f6f9ae21c96eef9d00202dc22f949886 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3379 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-4 |
network_name_str |
Conpedi Law Review |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Systematic Review of the Literature on Electronic Democracy and Electronic GovernmentRevisão Sistemática da Literatura sobre Democracia Eletrônica e Governo EletrônicoEletronic DemocracyE-democracyElectronic GovernmentE-governmentSystematic review.Democracia EletrônicaE-democracyGoverno EletrônicoE-governmentRevisão sistemática.This article aims, through a systematic literature review, answer the following research question: What are the methods used in articles containing the words e-democracy and e-government and which concepts of these issues? To select the articles used the Scopus database with the keywords AND e-democracy e-government and the temporal filter publications from the 2000s until the month of June 2015. Through filters were selected ten articles that compose the sample of this study. After the analysis it can be seen that the concept of e-government is fairly uniform, while the same is not true of the definition of electronic democracy. In addition, it can be said that the articles are mostly based on qualitative methods which are more scarce the approach of applied research. The few references found evidence the space and the need for further research that could strengthen mainly the study of initiatives and experiences of government and electronic democracy. O presente artigo busca, por meio de uma revisão sistemática da literatura, responder a seguinte pergunta de pesquisa: Quais são os métodos utilizados em artigos que contenham as palavras e democracy e e-government e quais os conceitos destes temas? Para a seleção dos artigos utilizou-se a base de dados Scopus, com as palavras-chave e-democracy AND e-government e o filtro temporal de publicações a partir dos anos 2000 até o mês de Junho de 2015. Através de filtros foram selecionados dez artigos que compõe a amostra deste estudo. Após a análise pode-se perceber que o conceito de governo eletrônico é razoavelmente uniformizado, enquanto que o mesmo não acontece com a definição de democracia eletrônica. Além disso, pode-se afirmar que os artigos são principalmente baseados em métodos qualitativos e que são mais escassos a abordagem de pesquisas aplicadas. As poucas referências encontradas evidenciam o espaço e a necessidade de novas pesquisas que possam aprofundar, principalmente, o estudo de iniciativas e experiências de governo e democracia eletrônica.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI2016-06-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/337910.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i9.3379Conpedi Law Review; v. 1 n. 9 (2015): Direito Mercantil, Direito Civil, Direito do Consumidor, Novas Tecnologias Aplicadas ao Direito; 208-2332448-39312448-3931reponame:Conpedi Law Reviewinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3379/2896Copyright (c) 2016 Mariana Pessini Mezzaroba, Clerilei Aparecida Bierinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMezzaroba, Mariana PessiniBier, Clerilei Aparecida2021-08-20T02:09:52Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3379Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireviewONGhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2448-39312448-3931opendoar:2021-08-20T02:09:52Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Systematic Review of the Literature on Electronic Democracy and Electronic Government Revisão Sistemática da Literatura sobre Democracia Eletrônica e Governo Eletrônico |
title |
Systematic Review of the Literature on Electronic Democracy and Electronic Government |
spellingShingle |
Systematic Review of the Literature on Electronic Democracy and Electronic Government Mezzaroba, Mariana Pessini Eletronic Democracy E-democracy Electronic Government E-government Systematic review. Democracia Eletrônica E-democracy Governo Eletrônico E-government Revisão sistemática. |
title_short |
Systematic Review of the Literature on Electronic Democracy and Electronic Government |
title_full |
Systematic Review of the Literature on Electronic Democracy and Electronic Government |
title_fullStr |
Systematic Review of the Literature on Electronic Democracy and Electronic Government |
title_full_unstemmed |
Systematic Review of the Literature on Electronic Democracy and Electronic Government |
title_sort |
Systematic Review of the Literature on Electronic Democracy and Electronic Government |
author |
Mezzaroba, Mariana Pessini |
author_facet |
Mezzaroba, Mariana Pessini Bier, Clerilei Aparecida |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bier, Clerilei Aparecida |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mezzaroba, Mariana Pessini Bier, Clerilei Aparecida |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Eletronic Democracy E-democracy Electronic Government E-government Systematic review. Democracia Eletrônica E-democracy Governo Eletrônico E-government Revisão sistemática. |
topic |
Eletronic Democracy E-democracy Electronic Government E-government Systematic review. Democracia Eletrônica E-democracy Governo Eletrônico E-government Revisão sistemática. |
description |
This article aims, through a systematic literature review, answer the following research question: What are the methods used in articles containing the words e-democracy and e-government and which concepts of these issues? To select the articles used the Scopus database with the keywords AND e-democracy e-government and the temporal filter publications from the 2000s until the month of June 2015. Through filters were selected ten articles that compose the sample of this study. After the analysis it can be seen that the concept of e-government is fairly uniform, while the same is not true of the definition of electronic democracy. In addition, it can be said that the articles are mostly based on qualitative methods which are more scarce the approach of applied research. The few references found evidence the space and the need for further research that could strengthen mainly the study of initiatives and experiences of government and electronic democracy. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3379 10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i9.3379 |
url |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3379 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i9.3379 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3379/2896 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Mariana Pessini Mezzaroba, Clerilei Aparecida Bier info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Mariana Pessini Mezzaroba, Clerilei Aparecida Bier |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Conpedi Law Review; v. 1 n. 9 (2015): Direito Mercantil, Direito Civil, Direito do Consumidor, Novas Tecnologias Aplicadas ao Direito; 208-233 2448-3931 2448-3931 reponame:Conpedi Law Review instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Conpedi Law Review |
collection |
Conpedi Law Review |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1809730144397426688 |