Judgement capacity evaluation & decision making based on International Accounting Standards

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oro, Ieda Margarete
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Klann, Roberto Carlos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.crcsc.org.br/index.php/CRCSC/article/view/2273
Resumo: The current international standards emphasize the need for judgment and decision making of accounting professionals on issues involving the recognition and measurement of financial facts. The aim of this study is to evaluate the judgment and decision making of accountancy academic professionals in resolving issues involving international standards. Depending on the characteristics of the study we sought to develop the analysis, the association with the classic heuristic decision making, such as representativeness, availability, anchoring and adjustment. The research is characterized as an exploratory study, a Survey with a quantitative approach. The sample consisted of 97 graduating students in Accounting from a University of Santa Catarina. The questionnaire selected 6 issues involving judgment and decision-making and integrate evidence from the Federal Accounting Council. In the analysis of heuristics that involve judgment and decision-making, it was noticed an increasing use of heuristics of availability and anchoring and adjustment in the analyzed issues. The average percentage of correct answers in the six issues was considered low; however, it does not invalidate the results, but it draws attention to the degree of bounded rationality in decision making. Thus, it must be emphasized that the cognitive biases may be caused by the use of heuristics. The survey findings reveal important points that reinforce the importance of judgment and decision making in the academic training as an accountant skill.
id CRCSC-1_314bcd2fd08ae8055cb6c483f787f37a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2273
network_acronym_str CRCSC-1
network_name_str Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Judgement capacity evaluation & decision making based on International Accounting StandardsAvaliação da capacidade de julgamento & tomada de decisão baseado nas Normas Internacionais de ContabilidadeJulgamentoTomada de DecisãoHeurísticasNormas Internacionais de Contabilidade.JudgmentDecision MakingHeuristicsInternational Accounting Standards.The current international standards emphasize the need for judgment and decision making of accounting professionals on issues involving the recognition and measurement of financial facts. The aim of this study is to evaluate the judgment and decision making of accountancy academic professionals in resolving issues involving international standards. Depending on the characteristics of the study we sought to develop the analysis, the association with the classic heuristic decision making, such as representativeness, availability, anchoring and adjustment. The research is characterized as an exploratory study, a Survey with a quantitative approach. The sample consisted of 97 graduating students in Accounting from a University of Santa Catarina. The questionnaire selected 6 issues involving judgment and decision-making and integrate evidence from the Federal Accounting Council. In the analysis of heuristics that involve judgment and decision-making, it was noticed an increasing use of heuristics of availability and anchoring and adjustment in the analyzed issues. The average percentage of correct answers in the six issues was considered low; however, it does not invalidate the results, but it draws attention to the degree of bounded rationality in decision making. Thus, it must be emphasized that the cognitive biases may be caused by the use of heuristics. The survey findings reveal important points that reinforce the importance of judgment and decision making in the academic training as an accountant skill.As normas internacionais vigentes evidenciam a necessidade do julgamento e tomada de decisão dos profissionais da contabilidade nas questões que envolvem o reconhecimento e a mensuração dos fatos contábeis. O objetivo deste estudo é avaliar a capacidade de julgamento e tomada de decisão de acadêmicos de ciências contábeis na resolução de questões que envolvem as normas internacionais. Em função das características do estudo, buscou-se, no desenvolvimento da análise, a associação com as heurísticas clássicas da tomada de decisão: representatividade, disponibilidade, ancoragem e ajuste. A pesquisa caracteriza-se como um estudo exploratório, survey com abordagem quantitativa. A amostra consistiu de 97 alunos do curso de graduação em Ciências Contábeis de uma universidade de Santa Catarina. O questionário selecionou 6 questões que envolvem julgamento e tomada de decisão e integram provas do Conselho Federal de Contabilidade. Na análise das heurísticas, que envolvem o julgamento e a tomada de decisão, constatou-se maior uso das heurísticas da disponibilidade e ancoragem e ajuste nas questões analisadas. A média percentual de acertos nas seis questões foi considerada baixa, contudo, não invalida os resultados, mas chama a atenção para o grau de racionalidade limitada nas decisões. É preciso ressaltar que os vieses cognitivos podem ser provocados pelo uso das heurísticas. Os achados da pesquisa revelam pontos significativos e que reforçam a importância do julgamento e tomada de decisão na formação acadêmica, como habilidade do Contador.Conselho Regional de Contabilidade de Santa Catarina2017-04-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revista.crcsc.org.br/index.php/CRCSC/article/view/227310.16930/2237-7662/rccc.v16n47p51-68Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil; v. 16 n. 47 (2017): Janeiro-Abril2237-76621808-378110.16930/2237-7662/rccc.v16n47reponame:Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil (Online)instname:Conselho Regional de Contabilidade de Santa Catarina (CRCSC)instacron:CRCSCporenghttps://revista.crcsc.org.br/index.php/CRCSC/article/view/2273/1909https://revista.crcsc.org.br/index.php/CRCSC/article/view/2273/1921Oro, Ieda MargareteKlann, Roberto Carlosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-06-16T04:24:13Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2273Revistahttp://www.atena.org.br/revista/ojs-2.2.3-06/index.php/crcscPRIhttp://revista.crcsc.org.br/revista/ojs-2.2.3-06/index.php/CRCSC/oai||revista@crcsc.org.br2237-76621808-3781opendoar:2021-06-16T04:24:13Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil (Online) - Conselho Regional de Contabilidade de Santa Catarina (CRCSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Judgement capacity evaluation & decision making based on International Accounting Standards
Avaliação da capacidade de julgamento & tomada de decisão baseado nas Normas Internacionais de Contabilidade
title Judgement capacity evaluation & decision making based on International Accounting Standards
spellingShingle Judgement capacity evaluation & decision making based on International Accounting Standards
Oro, Ieda Margarete
Julgamento
Tomada de Decisão
Heurísticas
Normas Internacionais de Contabilidade.
Judgment
Decision Making
Heuristics
International Accounting Standards.
title_short Judgement capacity evaluation & decision making based on International Accounting Standards
title_full Judgement capacity evaluation & decision making based on International Accounting Standards
title_fullStr Judgement capacity evaluation & decision making based on International Accounting Standards
title_full_unstemmed Judgement capacity evaluation & decision making based on International Accounting Standards
title_sort Judgement capacity evaluation & decision making based on International Accounting Standards
author Oro, Ieda Margarete
author_facet Oro, Ieda Margarete
Klann, Roberto Carlos
author_role author
author2 Klann, Roberto Carlos
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oro, Ieda Margarete
Klann, Roberto Carlos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Julgamento
Tomada de Decisão
Heurísticas
Normas Internacionais de Contabilidade.
Judgment
Decision Making
Heuristics
International Accounting Standards.
topic Julgamento
Tomada de Decisão
Heurísticas
Normas Internacionais de Contabilidade.
Judgment
Decision Making
Heuristics
International Accounting Standards.
description The current international standards emphasize the need for judgment and decision making of accounting professionals on issues involving the recognition and measurement of financial facts. The aim of this study is to evaluate the judgment and decision making of accountancy academic professionals in resolving issues involving international standards. Depending on the characteristics of the study we sought to develop the analysis, the association with the classic heuristic decision making, such as representativeness, availability, anchoring and adjustment. The research is characterized as an exploratory study, a Survey with a quantitative approach. The sample consisted of 97 graduating students in Accounting from a University of Santa Catarina. The questionnaire selected 6 issues involving judgment and decision-making and integrate evidence from the Federal Accounting Council. In the analysis of heuristics that involve judgment and decision-making, it was noticed an increasing use of heuristics of availability and anchoring and adjustment in the analyzed issues. The average percentage of correct answers in the six issues was considered low; however, it does not invalidate the results, but it draws attention to the degree of bounded rationality in decision making. Thus, it must be emphasized that the cognitive biases may be caused by the use of heuristics. The survey findings reveal important points that reinforce the importance of judgment and decision making in the academic training as an accountant skill.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-04-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.crcsc.org.br/index.php/CRCSC/article/view/2273
10.16930/2237-7662/rccc.v16n47p51-68
url https://revista.crcsc.org.br/index.php/CRCSC/article/view/2273
identifier_str_mv 10.16930/2237-7662/rccc.v16n47p51-68
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.crcsc.org.br/index.php/CRCSC/article/view/2273/1909
https://revista.crcsc.org.br/index.php/CRCSC/article/view/2273/1921
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Regional de Contabilidade de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Regional de Contabilidade de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil; v. 16 n. 47 (2017): Janeiro-Abril
2237-7662
1808-3781
10.16930/2237-7662/rccc.v16n47
reponame:Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil (Online)
instname:Conselho Regional de Contabilidade de Santa Catarina (CRCSC)
instacron:CRCSC
instname_str Conselho Regional de Contabilidade de Santa Catarina (CRCSC)
instacron_str CRCSC
institution CRCSC
reponame_str Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil (Online)
collection Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil (Online) - Conselho Regional de Contabilidade de Santa Catarina (CRCSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista@crcsc.org.br
_version_ 1809731682761179136