Avaliação das dimensões transversais e análise da resistência à fratura de mini-implantes ortodônticos fabricados no Brasil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gadêlha, Flávio Paiva
Data de Publicação: 2007
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubas
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/1301
Resumo: This work aims at to clarify referring points to the mechanics resistance of these devices and its relation with some transversal measures of the auto-armor-piercing mini-implants of some diameters of three national manufacturers: Conexão, Neodent and Sin. A sample of 36 mini-implants divided for diameter in 6 groups had been evaluated. The evaluated diameters had been 1,3 mm, 1.4 mm, 1.5 mm, 1.6 mm and 1.8 mm. The mini-implants had been measured in its diameters in three points in the height of its neck: D1- neck or trans-gingival portion; D2- nucleus of the thread soon after the neck; D3- external portion of the first thread step soon after the neck. The results were compared to the diameter supplied for the manufacturer. Later, all the mini-implants had been tested the breaking resistance through torsion assay, getting as resulted the Torque of Rupture (TR) and the Angular Deflection of Rupture (ADR). The results showed that only the Neodent mini-implants 1,3 and 1,6 mm had presented measures coincident with the values supplied for the manufacturer. The mini-implants had presented a TR and a ADR medium in each group of, 20 N.cm and 174,23 ° for the Neodent 1,3 mm; 33,9 N.cm and 85° for the Sin 1,4 mm; 26,4 N.cm and 57,47 ° for the Conexão 1,5 mm; 37,5 N.cm and 187,73 ° for the Neodent 1,6 mm ; 48,2 N.cm and 151 ° for the Sin 1,6 mm; e 67,8 N.cm and 143,67 ° for the Sin 1,8 mm. Spearman and Pearson tests showed positive correlation between the TR for the mini-implants of Neodent and Sin, but the correlation was weak. The statistical evaluation between the DAR and the diameters measured accused a low correlation for all manufacturers and diameters studied. It follows that factors such as, design of the mini-implants, and others can be related to the resistance to fracture the mini-implants.
id CUB_2e8e489fa5f3c65ac82740539e5e39e6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br:123456789/1301
network_acronym_str CUB
network_name_str Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubas
repository_id_str
spelling Avaliação das dimensões transversais e análise da resistência à fratura de mini-implantes ortodônticos fabricados no BrasilImplantesTorqueResistência de materiaisOrtodontiaODONTOLOGIAThis work aims at to clarify referring points to the mechanics resistance of these devices and its relation with some transversal measures of the auto-armor-piercing mini-implants of some diameters of three national manufacturers: Conexão, Neodent and Sin. A sample of 36 mini-implants divided for diameter in 6 groups had been evaluated. The evaluated diameters had been 1,3 mm, 1.4 mm, 1.5 mm, 1.6 mm and 1.8 mm. The mini-implants had been measured in its diameters in three points in the height of its neck: D1- neck or trans-gingival portion; D2- nucleus of the thread soon after the neck; D3- external portion of the first thread step soon after the neck. The results were compared to the diameter supplied for the manufacturer. Later, all the mini-implants had been tested the breaking resistance through torsion assay, getting as resulted the Torque of Rupture (TR) and the Angular Deflection of Rupture (ADR). The results showed that only the Neodent mini-implants 1,3 and 1,6 mm had presented measures coincident with the values supplied for the manufacturer. The mini-implants had presented a TR and a ADR medium in each group of, 20 N.cm and 174,23 ° for the Neodent 1,3 mm; 33,9 N.cm and 85° for the Sin 1,4 mm; 26,4 N.cm and 57,47 ° for the Conexão 1,5 mm; 37,5 N.cm and 187,73 ° for the Neodent 1,6 mm ; 48,2 N.cm and 151 ° for the Sin 1,6 mm; e 67,8 N.cm and 143,67 ° for the Sin 1,8 mm. Spearman and Pearson tests showed positive correlation between the TR for the mini-implants of Neodent and Sin, but the correlation was weak. The statistical evaluation between the DAR and the diameters measured accused a low correlation for all manufacturers and diameters studied. It follows that factors such as, design of the mini-implants, and others can be related to the resistance to fracture the mini-implants.Este trabalho visou esclarecer pontos referentes à resistência mecânica destes dispositivos e sua relação com algumas medidas transversais dos mini-implantes auto-perfurantes de diversos diâmetros de três fabricantes nacionais: Conexão, Neodent e Sin. Foram avaliados 36 mini-implantes divididos por diâmetro em 6 grupos. Os diâmetros avaliados foram 1,3 mm, 1,4 mm, 1,5 mm, 1,6 mm e 1,8 mm. Os mini-implantes foram mensurados em seus diâmetros em três pontos na altura do seu pescoço. D1- pescoço ou porção trans-mucosa; D2- núcleo da rosca logo após o pescoço; D3- porção externa do primeiro passo de rosca após o pescoço. Os resultados foram comparados aos diâmetros fornecidos pelos fabricantes. Posteriormente, os mini-implantes foram testados quanto a sua resistência à fratura através de ensaio de torção obtendo como resultado o torque de ruptura (TR) e a deflexão angular de ruptura (DAR). Os resultados demonstraram que somente os mini-implantes 1,3 e 1,6 mm da Neodent apresentaram medidas estatisticamente coincidentes com os valores fornecidos pelo fabricante. Os mini-implantes apresentaram um TR e uma DAR médio em cada grupo, de 20 N.cm e 174,23 ° para o 1,3 mm da Neodent; 33,9 N.cm e 85° para o 1,4 mm da Sin; 26,4 N.cm e 57,47 ° para o 1,5 mm da Conexão; 37,5 N.cm e 187,73 ° para o 1,6 mm da Neodent; 48,2 N.cm e 151 ° para o 1,6 mm da Sin; e 67,8 N.cm e 143,67 ° para o 1,8 mm da Sin. Os testes de Spearman e Pearson demonstraram correlação positiva entre o TR para os mini-implantes da Neodent e da Sin, porêm esta correlação foi fraca. A avaliação estatística entre a DAR e os diâmetros medidos acusaram uma baixa correlação para todos os fabricantes e diâmetros estudados. Conclui-se que fatores como, desenho dos mini-implantes, e outros podem estar relacionados à resistência à fratura dos mini-implantes.Universidade Cidade de São PauloBrasilPós-GraduaçãoPrograma de Pós-Graduação Mestrado em OrtodontiaUNICIDCotrim-Ferreira, Flávio Augustohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4302143887867441Gadêlha, Flávio Paiva2021-01-21T12:25:39Z20072021-01-21T12:25:39Z2007info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfGADÊLHA, Flávio Paiva. Avaliação das dimensões transversais e análise da resistência à fratura de mini-implantes ortodônticos fabricados no brasil. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Flávio Augusto Cotrim-Ferreira. 2007.94 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ortodontia) - Universidade Cidade de São Paulo. 2007https://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/1301porBae S, Park H, Kyung H, Kwon O, Sung J. Clinical application of micro-implant anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 2002 May; 36 (5): 298-302. Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intraosseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1969; 3(2): 81-100. Carano A, Velo S, Incorvati C, Poggio P. Clinical applications of the Mini-Screw-Anchorage-System (M.A.S.) in the maxillary alveolar bone. Prog Orthod 2004; 5(2): 212-230. Carano A, Lonardo P, Velo S, Incorvati C. Mechanical properties of three different commercially available skeletal anchorage. Prog Orthod 2005 May; 6 (1):82-93. Cope JB. Temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: a paradigm shift. Semin Orthod 2005; 11: 3-9. Costa A, Raffaini M, Melsen B. Mini screws as orthodontic anchorage: a preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg.1998; 13(3): 201-9. Creekmore TD, Eklund MK. Possibility of skeletal anchorage. J Clin Orthod.1983 April; 17(4): 266-9. Enacar A, Giray B, Pehlivanoglu M, Iplikcioglu H. Facemask therapy with rigid anchorage in a patient with maxillary hypoplasia and severe oligodontia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 May; 123 (5): 571-7. Favero L, Brollo P, Bressan E. Orthodontic anchorage with specific fixtures:related study analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Jul; 122 (1): 84-94. Gainsforth BL, Higley LB. A study of orthodontic anchorage possibilities in basal bone. Am J Orthod Oral Surg. 1945; 31(1):.406-17. Gray JB, Smith R. Transitional implants for orthodontic anchorage.J Clin Orthod. 2000 Nov; 34(11): 659-66. Huang L, Shortwell JL, Wang H. Dental implants for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127(6):713-22. Huja S, Litsky AS, Beck FM, Johnson KA, Larsen PE. Pull-out strength of monocortical screws placed in the maxillae and mandibles of dogs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Mar; 127 (3): 307-13. Kanony R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod.1997 Nov; 31(11): 763-7. Kuroda S, Katayama A, Takama-Yamamoto T. Severe anterior open-bite case treated using Titanium screw anchorage. Angle Orthod 2004 Aug; 74(4): 558-67. Kyung H, Park H, Bae S, Sung J, Kim I. Development of orthodontic micro-implants for intraoral anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 2003 Jun; 37 (6): 321-9. Liou EJW, Pai BCJ, Lin JCY. Do miniscrew remain stationary under orthodontic forces? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004 Jul; 126(1): 42-7 Mah J, Bergstrang, F, Graham, JW. Temporary anchorage device: a status report. J. Clin. Orthod. 2005 Mar; 39 (3):132-6. Marassi C, Leal A, Herdy JL, Chianelli O, Sobreira D. O uso de miniimplantes como auxiliares do tratamento ortodôntico. Ortodontia SPO. 2005 Jul-Set; 38 (3): 256-65. Melsen B, Lang NP. Biological reactions of alveolar bone to orthodontic loading of oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 2(2):144-52. Melsen B. Mini-implants: Where are we? J Clin Orthod 2005 Sep; 39(9): 539-47. Melsen B, Verna C. Miniscrew implant: The Aarhus Anchorage System. Semin Orthod 2005; 11: 24-31. Miyawaki S, Koyama S, Inoue M, Mishima K, Sugahara T, Takano-Yamamoto T. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Oct; 124(4):373-8. Motoyoshi M, Hirabayashi M, Uemura M, Shimizu N. Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant. Clin Oral Impl Res 2006 Feb; 17(1): 109-114. Ohmae M, Saito S, Morohashi T, Seki K, Qu H, Kanomi R, et al. A clinical and histological evaluation of titanium mini-implants as anchors for orthodontic intrusion in the beagle dog. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 May; 119 (5): 489-97. Park H, Kyung H, Sung J. A simple method of molar uprighting with micro-implant anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 2002 Oct; 36 (10): 592-6. Park HS, Kwon OW, Sung JH. Uprighting second molars with micro-implant anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 2004 Feb;38(2):100-3 Park HS, Kwon OW, Sung JH. Micro-implant anchorage for forced eruption of impacted canines. .J Clin Orthod. 2004 May; 38(5):297-302. Park HS, Kwon TG, Kwon OW. Treatment of open bite with microscrew implant anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004Nov; 126(5):627-36. Roberts WE, Smith RK, Zilberman Y, Mozsary PG, Smiths RS. Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. Am J Orthod. 1984 Aug; 86(2): 95-111. Soares MS, Tortamano A. O uso dos mini-implantes como auxiliar na ancoragem ortodôntica. Livro do 23° Congresso de São Paulo 2005; cap 12 p 265-79. Suzuki EY, Buranastidporn B. An adjustable surgical guide for miniscrew placement. J Clin Orthod. 2005 Oct; 39(10):588-90. Teixeira PAL, Escossia Jr J. Uso de microimplantes como recurso de ancoragem ortodôntica: relato de caso. J Bras Ortod Ortop Facial 2004; 9(54): 570-3. Villela H, Bezerra F, Laboissiere Jr M. Microparafuso ortodôntico de titânio auto-perfurante (MPO): Novo protocolo cirúrgico e atuais perspectivas clínicas. Innovation implant Journal 2006 Maio; 1(1): 46-53.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubasinstname:Centro Universitário Braz Cubas (CUB)instacron:CUB2021-01-21T14:33:47Zoai:repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br:123456789/1301Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.brazcubas.edu.br/oai/requestbibli@brazcubas.edu.bropendoar:2021-01-21T14:33:47Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubas - Centro Universitário Braz Cubas (CUB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Avaliação das dimensões transversais e análise da resistência à fratura de mini-implantes ortodônticos fabricados no Brasil
title Avaliação das dimensões transversais e análise da resistência à fratura de mini-implantes ortodônticos fabricados no Brasil
spellingShingle Avaliação das dimensões transversais e análise da resistência à fratura de mini-implantes ortodônticos fabricados no Brasil
Gadêlha, Flávio Paiva
Implantes
Torque
Resistência de materiais
Ortodontia
ODONTOLOGIA
title_short Avaliação das dimensões transversais e análise da resistência à fratura de mini-implantes ortodônticos fabricados no Brasil
title_full Avaliação das dimensões transversais e análise da resistência à fratura de mini-implantes ortodônticos fabricados no Brasil
title_fullStr Avaliação das dimensões transversais e análise da resistência à fratura de mini-implantes ortodônticos fabricados no Brasil
title_full_unstemmed Avaliação das dimensões transversais e análise da resistência à fratura de mini-implantes ortodônticos fabricados no Brasil
title_sort Avaliação das dimensões transversais e análise da resistência à fratura de mini-implantes ortodônticos fabricados no Brasil
author Gadêlha, Flávio Paiva
author_facet Gadêlha, Flávio Paiva
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Cotrim-Ferreira, Flávio Augusto
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4302143887867441
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gadêlha, Flávio Paiva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Implantes
Torque
Resistência de materiais
Ortodontia
ODONTOLOGIA
topic Implantes
Torque
Resistência de materiais
Ortodontia
ODONTOLOGIA
description This work aims at to clarify referring points to the mechanics resistance of these devices and its relation with some transversal measures of the auto-armor-piercing mini-implants of some diameters of three national manufacturers: Conexão, Neodent and Sin. A sample of 36 mini-implants divided for diameter in 6 groups had been evaluated. The evaluated diameters had been 1,3 mm, 1.4 mm, 1.5 mm, 1.6 mm and 1.8 mm. The mini-implants had been measured in its diameters in three points in the height of its neck: D1- neck or trans-gingival portion; D2- nucleus of the thread soon after the neck; D3- external portion of the first thread step soon after the neck. The results were compared to the diameter supplied for the manufacturer. Later, all the mini-implants had been tested the breaking resistance through torsion assay, getting as resulted the Torque of Rupture (TR) and the Angular Deflection of Rupture (ADR). The results showed that only the Neodent mini-implants 1,3 and 1,6 mm had presented measures coincident with the values supplied for the manufacturer. The mini-implants had presented a TR and a ADR medium in each group of, 20 N.cm and 174,23 ° for the Neodent 1,3 mm; 33,9 N.cm and 85° for the Sin 1,4 mm; 26,4 N.cm and 57,47 ° for the Conexão 1,5 mm; 37,5 N.cm and 187,73 ° for the Neodent 1,6 mm ; 48,2 N.cm and 151 ° for the Sin 1,6 mm; e 67,8 N.cm and 143,67 ° for the Sin 1,8 mm. Spearman and Pearson tests showed positive correlation between the TR for the mini-implants of Neodent and Sin, but the correlation was weak. The statistical evaluation between the DAR and the diameters measured accused a low correlation for all manufacturers and diameters studied. It follows that factors such as, design of the mini-implants, and others can be related to the resistance to fracture the mini-implants.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007
2007
2021-01-21T12:25:39Z
2021-01-21T12:25:39Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv GADÊLHA, Flávio Paiva. Avaliação das dimensões transversais e análise da resistência à fratura de mini-implantes ortodônticos fabricados no brasil. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Flávio Augusto Cotrim-Ferreira. 2007.94 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ortodontia) - Universidade Cidade de São Paulo. 2007
https://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/1301
identifier_str_mv GADÊLHA, Flávio Paiva. Avaliação das dimensões transversais e análise da resistência à fratura de mini-implantes ortodônticos fabricados no brasil. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Flávio Augusto Cotrim-Ferreira. 2007.94 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ortodontia) - Universidade Cidade de São Paulo. 2007
url https://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/1301
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Bae S, Park H, Kyung H, Kwon O, Sung J. Clinical application of micro-implant anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 2002 May; 36 (5): 298-302. Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intraosseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1969; 3(2): 81-100. Carano A, Velo S, Incorvati C, Poggio P. Clinical applications of the Mini-Screw-Anchorage-System (M.A.S.) in the maxillary alveolar bone. Prog Orthod 2004; 5(2): 212-230. Carano A, Lonardo P, Velo S, Incorvati C. Mechanical properties of three different commercially available skeletal anchorage. Prog Orthod 2005 May; 6 (1):82-93. Cope JB. Temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: a paradigm shift. Semin Orthod 2005; 11: 3-9. Costa A, Raffaini M, Melsen B. Mini screws as orthodontic anchorage: a preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg.1998; 13(3): 201-9. Creekmore TD, Eklund MK. Possibility of skeletal anchorage. J Clin Orthod.1983 April; 17(4): 266-9. Enacar A, Giray B, Pehlivanoglu M, Iplikcioglu H. Facemask therapy with rigid anchorage in a patient with maxillary hypoplasia and severe oligodontia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 May; 123 (5): 571-7. Favero L, Brollo P, Bressan E. Orthodontic anchorage with specific fixtures:related study analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Jul; 122 (1): 84-94. Gainsforth BL, Higley LB. A study of orthodontic anchorage possibilities in basal bone. Am J Orthod Oral Surg. 1945; 31(1):.406-17. Gray JB, Smith R. Transitional implants for orthodontic anchorage.J Clin Orthod. 2000 Nov; 34(11): 659-66. Huang L, Shortwell JL, Wang H. Dental implants for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127(6):713-22. Huja S, Litsky AS, Beck FM, Johnson KA, Larsen PE. Pull-out strength of monocortical screws placed in the maxillae and mandibles of dogs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Mar; 127 (3): 307-13. Kanony R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod.1997 Nov; 31(11): 763-7. Kuroda S, Katayama A, Takama-Yamamoto T. Severe anterior open-bite case treated using Titanium screw anchorage. Angle Orthod 2004 Aug; 74(4): 558-67. Kyung H, Park H, Bae S, Sung J, Kim I. Development of orthodontic micro-implants for intraoral anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 2003 Jun; 37 (6): 321-9. Liou EJW, Pai BCJ, Lin JCY. Do miniscrew remain stationary under orthodontic forces? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004 Jul; 126(1): 42-7 Mah J, Bergstrang, F, Graham, JW. Temporary anchorage device: a status report. J. Clin. Orthod. 2005 Mar; 39 (3):132-6. Marassi C, Leal A, Herdy JL, Chianelli O, Sobreira D. O uso de miniimplantes como auxiliares do tratamento ortodôntico. Ortodontia SPO. 2005 Jul-Set; 38 (3): 256-65. Melsen B, Lang NP. Biological reactions of alveolar bone to orthodontic loading of oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 2(2):144-52. Melsen B. Mini-implants: Where are we? J Clin Orthod 2005 Sep; 39(9): 539-47. Melsen B, Verna C. Miniscrew implant: The Aarhus Anchorage System. Semin Orthod 2005; 11: 24-31. Miyawaki S, Koyama S, Inoue M, Mishima K, Sugahara T, Takano-Yamamoto T. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Oct; 124(4):373-8. Motoyoshi M, Hirabayashi M, Uemura M, Shimizu N. Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant. Clin Oral Impl Res 2006 Feb; 17(1): 109-114. Ohmae M, Saito S, Morohashi T, Seki K, Qu H, Kanomi R, et al. A clinical and histological evaluation of titanium mini-implants as anchors for orthodontic intrusion in the beagle dog. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 May; 119 (5): 489-97. Park H, Kyung H, Sung J. A simple method of molar uprighting with micro-implant anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 2002 Oct; 36 (10): 592-6. Park HS, Kwon OW, Sung JH. Uprighting second molars with micro-implant anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 2004 Feb;38(2):100-3 Park HS, Kwon OW, Sung JH. Micro-implant anchorage for forced eruption of impacted canines. .J Clin Orthod. 2004 May; 38(5):297-302. Park HS, Kwon TG, Kwon OW. Treatment of open bite with microscrew implant anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004Nov; 126(5):627-36. Roberts WE, Smith RK, Zilberman Y, Mozsary PG, Smiths RS. Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. Am J Orthod. 1984 Aug; 86(2): 95-111. Soares MS, Tortamano A. O uso dos mini-implantes como auxiliar na ancoragem ortodôntica. Livro do 23° Congresso de São Paulo 2005; cap 12 p 265-79. Suzuki EY, Buranastidporn B. An adjustable surgical guide for miniscrew placement. J Clin Orthod. 2005 Oct; 39(10):588-90. Teixeira PAL, Escossia Jr J. Uso de microimplantes como recurso de ancoragem ortodôntica: relato de caso. J Bras Ortod Ortop Facial 2004; 9(54): 570-3. Villela H, Bezerra F, Laboissiere Jr M. Microparafuso ortodôntico de titânio auto-perfurante (MPO): Novo protocolo cirúrgico e atuais perspectivas clínicas. Innovation implant Journal 2006 Maio; 1(1): 46-53.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cidade de São Paulo
Brasil
Pós-Graduação
Programa de Pós-Graduação Mestrado em Ortodontia
UNICID
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cidade de São Paulo
Brasil
Pós-Graduação
Programa de Pós-Graduação Mestrado em Ortodontia
UNICID
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubas
instname:Centro Universitário Braz Cubas (CUB)
instacron:CUB
instname_str Centro Universitário Braz Cubas (CUB)
instacron_str CUB
institution CUB
reponame_str Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubas
collection Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubas
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubas - Centro Universitário Braz Cubas (CUB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bibli@brazcubas.edu.br
_version_ 1798311358020714496

Registros relacionados