The lack of equality in granting house arrest in the pandemic setting

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Ana Carolina Barbosa
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (Online)
Texto Completo: http://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/113
Resumo: The impacts of COVID-19 pandemic are particularly noticed by the most vulnerable groups. People deprived of their liberty, who already live with the precariousness of the state punitive system and the overcrowding of prisons, now suffer from an invisible, easily transmissible threat that has made them even more invisible. This current paper has as main reference the Recommendation 62/2020 of the National Council of Justice of Brazil, which guided the Judiciary across the country to adopt measures to contain the virus, but unfortunately, has not been fulfilled, under the allegation that it is not binding. Based on the jurisprudence of the higher courts and the legislation in force, the possibilities of replacing preventive prisons with house prisons are presented, in comparison with the new regulation brought by the National Council of Justice of Brazil. It also focuses on the interpretation given by some courts to Resolution 62/2020, establishing the contradiction of decisions in similar cases, to the damage of the principle of equality and legal certainty. Legislative reactions to the Recommendation (backlash effect) are also analyzed based on international human rights jurisprudence.
id DPDF_2f67150c00934dc27fec8545e00def92
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.localhost:article/113
network_acronym_str DPDF
network_name_str Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The lack of equality in granting house arrest in the pandemic settingA falta de isonomia na concessão de prisões domiciliares no contexto da pandemiaThe impacts of COVID-19 pandemic are particularly noticed by the most vulnerable groups. People deprived of their liberty, who already live with the precariousness of the state punitive system and the overcrowding of prisons, now suffer from an invisible, easily transmissible threat that has made them even more invisible. This current paper has as main reference the Recommendation 62/2020 of the National Council of Justice of Brazil, which guided the Judiciary across the country to adopt measures to contain the virus, but unfortunately, has not been fulfilled, under the allegation that it is not binding. Based on the jurisprudence of the higher courts and the legislation in force, the possibilities of replacing preventive prisons with house prisons are presented, in comparison with the new regulation brought by the National Council of Justice of Brazil. It also focuses on the interpretation given by some courts to Resolution 62/2020, establishing the contradiction of decisions in similar cases, to the damage of the principle of equality and legal certainty. Legislative reactions to the Recommendation (backlash effect) are also analyzed based on international human rights jurisprudence.Os impactos da pandemia de COVID-19 são especialmente percebidos pelos grupos mais vulneráveis. Pessoas privadas de liberdade, que já convivem com a precarização do sistema punitivo estatal e a superlotação dos estabelecimentos prisionais, agora sofrem com uma ameaça facilmente transmissível e que as tornou ainda mais invisibilizadas. O presente trabalho tem como principal referência a Recomendação 62/2020 do Conselho Nacional de Justiça, que orientou o Poder Judiciário de todo o país a adotar medidas de contenção do vírus. A partir da jurisprudência dos tribunais superiores e da legislação em vigor, são apresentadas as possibilidades de substituição das prisões preventivas por prisões domiciliares, em cotejo com o novo regramento trazido pelo Conselho Nacional de Justiça. Enfoca-se, ainda, a interpretação conferida à Resolução 62/2020, demonstrando-se a contrariedade das decisões em casos análogos, em prejuízo ao princípio da igualdade e da segurança jurídica. As reações legislativas à Recomendação (efeito backlash) são igualmente abordadas e analisadas à luz da jurisprudência internacional dos direitos humanos.Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal2021-04-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionDouble blind peer reviewAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/11310.29327/2193997.3.1-3Journal of Brazilian Federal District Public Defensorship; Vol 3 No 1 (2021): Law, security and liberties: legal mechanisms to individual and collective guarantees; 45-71Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal; v. 3 n. 1 (2021): Dossiê temático: "Direito, Segurança e Tutela das Liberdades: mecanismos jurídicos para garantias individuais e coletivas"; 45-712674-57552674-5739reponame:Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (Online)instname:Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (DPDF)instacron:DPDFporhttp://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/113/76http://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/113/229http://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/113/230Brazil, 2021Brasil, 2021Copyright (c) 2021 Ana Carolina Barbosa Pereirahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPereira, Ana Carolina Barbosa2023-03-30T17:15:42Zoai:ojs2.localhost:article/113Revistahttp://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/PUBhttp://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/oairevista@defensoria.df.gov.br||2674-57552674-5739opendoar:2023-03-30T17:15:42Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (Online) - Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (DPDF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The lack of equality in granting house arrest in the pandemic setting
A falta de isonomia na concessão de prisões domiciliares no contexto da pandemia
title The lack of equality in granting house arrest in the pandemic setting
spellingShingle The lack of equality in granting house arrest in the pandemic setting
Pereira, Ana Carolina Barbosa
title_short The lack of equality in granting house arrest in the pandemic setting
title_full The lack of equality in granting house arrest in the pandemic setting
title_fullStr The lack of equality in granting house arrest in the pandemic setting
title_full_unstemmed The lack of equality in granting house arrest in the pandemic setting
title_sort The lack of equality in granting house arrest in the pandemic setting
author Pereira, Ana Carolina Barbosa
author_facet Pereira, Ana Carolina Barbosa
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Ana Carolina Barbosa
description The impacts of COVID-19 pandemic are particularly noticed by the most vulnerable groups. People deprived of their liberty, who already live with the precariousness of the state punitive system and the overcrowding of prisons, now suffer from an invisible, easily transmissible threat that has made them even more invisible. This current paper has as main reference the Recommendation 62/2020 of the National Council of Justice of Brazil, which guided the Judiciary across the country to adopt measures to contain the virus, but unfortunately, has not been fulfilled, under the allegation that it is not binding. Based on the jurisprudence of the higher courts and the legislation in force, the possibilities of replacing preventive prisons with house prisons are presented, in comparison with the new regulation brought by the National Council of Justice of Brazil. It also focuses on the interpretation given by some courts to Resolution 62/2020, establishing the contradiction of decisions in similar cases, to the damage of the principle of equality and legal certainty. Legislative reactions to the Recommendation (backlash effect) are also analyzed based on international human rights jurisprudence.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Double blind peer review
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/113
10.29327/2193997.3.1-3
url http://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/113
identifier_str_mv 10.29327/2193997.3.1-3
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/113/76
http://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/113/229
http://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/113/230
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Ana Carolina Barbosa Pereira
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Ana Carolina Barbosa Pereira
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil, 2021
Brasil, 2021
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Brazilian Federal District Public Defensorship; Vol 3 No 1 (2021): Law, security and liberties: legal mechanisms to individual and collective guarantees; 45-71
Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal; v. 3 n. 1 (2021): Dossiê temático: "Direito, Segurança e Tutela das Liberdades: mecanismos jurídicos para garantias individuais e coletivas"; 45-71
2674-5755
2674-5739
reponame:Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (Online)
instname:Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (DPDF)
instacron:DPDF
instname_str Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (DPDF)
instacron_str DPDF
institution DPDF
reponame_str Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (Online)
collection Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (Online) - Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (DPDF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@defensoria.df.gov.br||
_version_ 1797068834718351360