ADI 6595
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/198 |
Resumo: | This article aims to indicate the edition of Law 13.967/2013 as an expression of populism in Brazil and the role of the Constitutional Text as a tool available to the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court in its containment. It will establish a common premise according to which the political and social phenomenon called populism has commons characteristics in its expressions in the different countries where it emerged. This paper also intends to indicate that, although there are a lot in common in the populist experiences around the world, there are peculiarities in the brazilian case, as said about the Law 13.697/2019, that can be considered as an expression of the practice of abusive constitutionalism. The paper will identify how the form and content of the Constitutional Text may be managed by the Brazilian Supreme Court against populist advances. |
id |
DPDF_868461306b0232ac7f8b5231fd732636 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.localhost:article/198 |
network_acronym_str |
DPDF |
network_name_str |
Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ADI 6595ADI 6595This article aims to indicate the edition of Law 13.967/2013 as an expression of populism in Brazil and the role of the Constitutional Text as a tool available to the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court in its containment. It will establish a common premise according to which the political and social phenomenon called populism has commons characteristics in its expressions in the different countries where it emerged. This paper also intends to indicate that, although there are a lot in common in the populist experiences around the world, there are peculiarities in the brazilian case, as said about the Law 13.697/2019, that can be considered as an expression of the practice of abusive constitutionalism. The paper will identify how the form and content of the Constitutional Text may be managed by the Brazilian Supreme Court against populist advances.O presente artigo visa indicar a edição da Lei 13.967/2013 como expressão do populismo no Brasil e o papel do Texto Constitucional como ferramenta disponível ao Supremo Tribunal Federal na sua contenção. Estabelecerá a premissa segundo a qual o populismo é fenômeno político e social de relevância global com características comuns em suas expressões nos diferentes países em que surgiu. Pretende o presente trabalho, ainda, indicar que, embora haja traços comuns às experiências populistas pelo mundo, há peculiaridades do caso brasileiro, em que se enquadra a citada Lei 13.697/2019, podendo ser considerada como expressão também da prática de constitucionalismo abusivo. O trabalho abordará a relevância da forma e do conteúdo do Texto Constitucional no manejo pela Suprema Corte brasileira como barreira contra os avanços populistas no país.Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal2023-07-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionDouble blind peer reviewAvaliação cega pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/19810.29327/2193997.5.1-7Journal of Brazilian Federal District Public Defensorship; Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Edição regular; 121-134Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal; v. 5 n. 1 (2023): Edição regular; 121-1342674-57552674-573910.29327/2193997.5.1reponame:Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (Online)instname:Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (DPDF)instacron:DPDFporhttp://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/198/303Brazil, 2023Brasil, 2023Copyright (c) 2023 Fabio Ribeiro Soares da Silvahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Fabio Ribeiro Soares da2023-07-27T05:18:15Zoai:ojs2.localhost:article/198Revistahttp://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/PUBhttp://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/oairevista@defensoria.df.gov.br||2674-57552674-5739opendoar:2023-07-27T05:18:15Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (Online) - Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (DPDF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ADI 6595 ADI 6595 |
title |
ADI 6595 |
spellingShingle |
ADI 6595 Silva, Fabio Ribeiro Soares da |
title_short |
ADI 6595 |
title_full |
ADI 6595 |
title_fullStr |
ADI 6595 |
title_full_unstemmed |
ADI 6595 |
title_sort |
ADI 6595 |
author |
Silva, Fabio Ribeiro Soares da |
author_facet |
Silva, Fabio Ribeiro Soares da |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Fabio Ribeiro Soares da |
description |
This article aims to indicate the edition of Law 13.967/2013 as an expression of populism in Brazil and the role of the Constitutional Text as a tool available to the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court in its containment. It will establish a common premise according to which the political and social phenomenon called populism has commons characteristics in its expressions in the different countries where it emerged. This paper also intends to indicate that, although there are a lot in common in the populist experiences around the world, there are peculiarities in the brazilian case, as said about the Law 13.697/2019, that can be considered as an expression of the practice of abusive constitutionalism. The paper will identify how the form and content of the Constitutional Text may be managed by the Brazilian Supreme Court against populist advances. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-07-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Double blind peer review Avaliação cega pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/198 10.29327/2193997.5.1-7 |
url |
http://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/198 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.29327/2193997.5.1-7 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/198/303 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Fabio Ribeiro Soares da Silva http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Fabio Ribeiro Soares da Silva http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil, 2023 Brasil, 2023 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Brazilian Federal District Public Defensorship; Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Edição regular; 121-134 Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal; v. 5 n. 1 (2023): Edição regular; 121-134 2674-5755 2674-5739 10.29327/2193997.5.1 reponame:Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (Online) instname:Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (DPDF) instacron:DPDF |
instname_str |
Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (DPDF) |
instacron_str |
DPDF |
institution |
DPDF |
reponame_str |
Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (Online) - Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (DPDF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@defensoria.df.gov.br|| |
_version_ |
1797068834929115136 |