Theoretical-empirical analysis of precautionary prison to guarantee the public order

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chaves Junior, Airto
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Silva, Luciana Bittencourt Gomes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (Online)
Texto Completo: http://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/95
Resumo: The article comprises a theoretical-empirical study of precautionary detention through research of 605 court decisions issued by the TJSC Criminal Chambers between 07/01/2019 to 07/01/2020, that have been analysed the requirement of keeping or decreeing provisional prisons related the narcotic traffic criminal processes. The verdicts where been analyzed to find out the reasons of prisons and if the subject-matter is in accordance with the law. The result concluded that most prisons were been justified by non-precautionary fundamentals, caused by interpretation of the public order exceeding the law and theoretical requirements. Regarding the adopted methodology, it was pointed out that the option was based on the inductive method and the techniques of the referent, the category, the operational concepts, the bibliographic research, and the empirical, due to the analysis of verdicts.
id DPDF_94e15219ba1e7af571212dedc705ae39
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.localhost:article/95
network_acronym_str DPDF
network_name_str Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Theoretical-empirical analysis of precautionary prison to guarantee the public orderAnálise teórico-empírica da prisão cautelar para garantia da ordem públicaThe article comprises a theoretical-empirical study of precautionary detention through research of 605 court decisions issued by the TJSC Criminal Chambers between 07/01/2019 to 07/01/2020, that have been analysed the requirement of keeping or decreeing provisional prisons related the narcotic traffic criminal processes. The verdicts where been analyzed to find out the reasons of prisons and if the subject-matter is in accordance with the law. The result concluded that most prisons were been justified by non-precautionary fundamentals, caused by interpretation of the public order exceeding the law and theoretical requirements. Regarding the adopted methodology, it was pointed out that the option was based on the inductive method and the techniques of the referent, the category, the operational concepts, the bibliographic research, and the empirical, due to the analysis of verdicts.O artigo compreende um estudo teórico-empírico da prisão preventiva, realizado por meio da pesquisa de 605 acórdãos lavrados pelas Câmaras Criminais do TJSC no período de 01/07/2019 a 01/07/2020, que examinaram a necessidade da manutenção ou decretação de prisões preventivas em processos relativos ao tráfico de drogas. Os votos foram analisados com o objetivo de aferir os motivos pelos quais se prende preventivamente e verificar se os fundamentos utilizados alinham-se ao embasamento teórico e legislativo que regula a matéria. Do exame, concluiu-se que, em expressiva proporção, as prisões foram motivadas por justificativas não cautelares, decorrentes de uma abrangente interpretação dada ao conceito de garantia da ordem pública, possibilitando que os limites da lei e seus requisitos teóricos fossem ultrapassados. Quanto à metodologia, na fase de investigação, denota-se a utilização dos métodos indutivo, o qual é subsidiado pela pesquisa bibliográfica, e empírico, tendo em vista a análise crítica dos precedentes jurisprudenciais.Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal2020-12-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionDouble blind peer reviewAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/9510.29327/2193997.2.3-6Journal of Brazilian Federal District Public Defensorship; Vol 2 No 3 (2020): Criminology and law; 53-77Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal; v. 2 n. 3 (2020): Criminologia e direito; 53-772674-57552674-5739reponame:Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (Online)instname:Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (DPDF)instacron:DPDFporhttp://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/95/66http://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/95/209http://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/95/210Brazil, 2020Brasil, 2020Copyright (c) 2020 Airto Chaves Junior, Luciana Bittencourt Gomes Silvahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessChaves Junior, AirtoSilva, Luciana Bittencourt Gomes2023-03-30T17:05:28Zoai:ojs2.localhost:article/95Revistahttp://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/PUBhttp://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/oairevista@defensoria.df.gov.br||2674-57552674-5739opendoar:2023-03-30T17:05:28Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (Online) - Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (DPDF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Theoretical-empirical analysis of precautionary prison to guarantee the public order
Análise teórico-empírica da prisão cautelar para garantia da ordem pública
title Theoretical-empirical analysis of precautionary prison to guarantee the public order
spellingShingle Theoretical-empirical analysis of precautionary prison to guarantee the public order
Chaves Junior, Airto
title_short Theoretical-empirical analysis of precautionary prison to guarantee the public order
title_full Theoretical-empirical analysis of precautionary prison to guarantee the public order
title_fullStr Theoretical-empirical analysis of precautionary prison to guarantee the public order
title_full_unstemmed Theoretical-empirical analysis of precautionary prison to guarantee the public order
title_sort Theoretical-empirical analysis of precautionary prison to guarantee the public order
author Chaves Junior, Airto
author_facet Chaves Junior, Airto
Silva, Luciana Bittencourt Gomes
author_role author
author2 Silva, Luciana Bittencourt Gomes
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chaves Junior, Airto
Silva, Luciana Bittencourt Gomes
description The article comprises a theoretical-empirical study of precautionary detention through research of 605 court decisions issued by the TJSC Criminal Chambers between 07/01/2019 to 07/01/2020, that have been analysed the requirement of keeping or decreeing provisional prisons related the narcotic traffic criminal processes. The verdicts where been analyzed to find out the reasons of prisons and if the subject-matter is in accordance with the law. The result concluded that most prisons were been justified by non-precautionary fundamentals, caused by interpretation of the public order exceeding the law and theoretical requirements. Regarding the adopted methodology, it was pointed out that the option was based on the inductive method and the techniques of the referent, the category, the operational concepts, the bibliographic research, and the empirical, due to the analysis of verdicts.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Double blind peer review
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/95
10.29327/2193997.2.3-6
url http://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/95
identifier_str_mv 10.29327/2193997.2.3-6
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/95/66
http://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/95/209
http://revista.defensoria.df.gov.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/95/210
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Airto Chaves Junior, Luciana Bittencourt Gomes Silva
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Airto Chaves Junior, Luciana Bittencourt Gomes Silva
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil, 2020
Brasil, 2020
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Brazilian Federal District Public Defensorship; Vol 2 No 3 (2020): Criminology and law; 53-77
Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal; v. 2 n. 3 (2020): Criminologia e direito; 53-77
2674-5755
2674-5739
reponame:Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (Online)
instname:Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (DPDF)
instacron:DPDF
instname_str Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (DPDF)
instacron_str DPDF
institution DPDF
reponame_str Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (Online)
collection Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (Online) - Defensoria Pública do Distrito Federal (DPDF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@defensoria.df.gov.br||
_version_ 1797068834694234112

Registros relacionados