Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Almeida,Marcio Rodrigues de
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Futagami,Cristina, Conti,Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira, Oltramari-Navarro,Paula Vanessa Pedron, Navarro,Ricardo de Lima
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512015000300050
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare dentoalveolar changes in mandibular arch, regarding transversal measures and buccal bone thickness, in patients undergoing the initial phase of orthodontic treatment with self-ligating or conventional bracket systems. METHODS: A sample of 25 patients requiring orthodontic treatment was assessed based on the bracket type. Group 1 comprised 13 patients bonded with 0.022-in self-ligating brackets (SLB). Group 2 included 12 patients bonded with 0.022-in conventional brackets (CLB). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and a 3D program (Dolphin) assessed changes in transversal width of buccal bone (TWBB) and buccal bone thickness (BBT) before (T1) and 7 months after treatment onset (T2). Measurements on dental casts were performed using a digital caliper. Differences between and within groups were analyzed by Student's t-test; Pearson correlation coefficient was also calculated. RESULTS: Significant mandibular expansion was observed for both groups; however, no significant differences were found between groups. There was significant decrease in mandibular buccal bone thickness and transversal width of buccal bone in both groups. There was no significant correlation between buccal bone thickness and dental arch expansion. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets systems regarding mandibular arch expansion and changes in buccal bone thickness or transversal width of buccal bone.
id DPI-1_0a69aa76b71a5ec5ad0a48f1834cdf3a
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2176-94512015000300050
network_acronym_str DPI-1
network_name_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository_id_str
spelling Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast studyOrthodontic appliancesCorrective orthodonticsOrthodontic brackets OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare dentoalveolar changes in mandibular arch, regarding transversal measures and buccal bone thickness, in patients undergoing the initial phase of orthodontic treatment with self-ligating or conventional bracket systems. METHODS: A sample of 25 patients requiring orthodontic treatment was assessed based on the bracket type. Group 1 comprised 13 patients bonded with 0.022-in self-ligating brackets (SLB). Group 2 included 12 patients bonded with 0.022-in conventional brackets (CLB). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and a 3D program (Dolphin) assessed changes in transversal width of buccal bone (TWBB) and buccal bone thickness (BBT) before (T1) and 7 months after treatment onset (T2). Measurements on dental casts were performed using a digital caliper. Differences between and within groups were analyzed by Student's t-test; Pearson correlation coefficient was also calculated. RESULTS: Significant mandibular expansion was observed for both groups; however, no significant differences were found between groups. There was significant decrease in mandibular buccal bone thickness and transversal width of buccal bone in both groups. There was no significant correlation between buccal bone thickness and dental arch expansion. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets systems regarding mandibular arch expansion and changes in buccal bone thickness or transversal width of buccal bone. Dental Press International2015-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512015000300050Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.20 n.3 2015reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/2176-9451.20.3.050-057.oarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlmeida,Marcio Rodrigues deFutagami,CristinaConti,Ana Cláudia de Castro FerreiraOltramari-Navarro,Paula Vanessa PedronNavarro,Ricardo de Limaeng2015-07-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512015000300050Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2015-07-03T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study
title Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study
spellingShingle Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study
Almeida,Marcio Rodrigues de
Orthodontic appliances
Corrective orthodontics
Orthodontic brackets
title_short Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study
title_full Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study
title_fullStr Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study
title_full_unstemmed Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study
title_sort Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study
author Almeida,Marcio Rodrigues de
author_facet Almeida,Marcio Rodrigues de
Futagami,Cristina
Conti,Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira
Oltramari-Navarro,Paula Vanessa Pedron
Navarro,Ricardo de Lima
author_role author
author2 Futagami,Cristina
Conti,Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira
Oltramari-Navarro,Paula Vanessa Pedron
Navarro,Ricardo de Lima
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Almeida,Marcio Rodrigues de
Futagami,Cristina
Conti,Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira
Oltramari-Navarro,Paula Vanessa Pedron
Navarro,Ricardo de Lima
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Orthodontic appliances
Corrective orthodontics
Orthodontic brackets
topic Orthodontic appliances
Corrective orthodontics
Orthodontic brackets
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare dentoalveolar changes in mandibular arch, regarding transversal measures and buccal bone thickness, in patients undergoing the initial phase of orthodontic treatment with self-ligating or conventional bracket systems. METHODS: A sample of 25 patients requiring orthodontic treatment was assessed based on the bracket type. Group 1 comprised 13 patients bonded with 0.022-in self-ligating brackets (SLB). Group 2 included 12 patients bonded with 0.022-in conventional brackets (CLB). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and a 3D program (Dolphin) assessed changes in transversal width of buccal bone (TWBB) and buccal bone thickness (BBT) before (T1) and 7 months after treatment onset (T2). Measurements on dental casts were performed using a digital caliper. Differences between and within groups were analyzed by Student's t-test; Pearson correlation coefficient was also calculated. RESULTS: Significant mandibular expansion was observed for both groups; however, no significant differences were found between groups. There was significant decrease in mandibular buccal bone thickness and transversal width of buccal bone in both groups. There was no significant correlation between buccal bone thickness and dental arch expansion. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences between self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets systems regarding mandibular arch expansion and changes in buccal bone thickness or transversal width of buccal bone.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512015000300050
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512015000300050
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2176-9451.20.3.050-057.oar
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.20 n.3 2015
reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
instname:Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron:DPI
instname_str Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron_str DPI
institution DPI
reponame_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
collection Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com
_version_ 1754122397255991296