Halogen light versus LED for bracket bonding: shear bond strength

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho,Paulo Eduardo Guedes
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Santos,Valdemir Muzulon dos, Isber,Hassan, Cotrim-Ferreira,Flávio Augusto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512013000100007
Resumo: INTRODUCTION: LED light-curing devices seek to provide a cold light activator which allows protocols of material polymerization with shorter duration. OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength of bracket bonding using three types of light-curing devices: One with halogen light (Optilight Plus - Gnatus) and two with LEDs (Optilight CL - Gnatus and Elipar Freelight - 3M/ESPE). RESULTS: Comparing the results by analysis of variance, the Gnatus LED device showed an inferior statistical behavior in relation to other light sources, when activated by a short time. But, when it was used for 40 seconds, the polymerization results were consistent with the other evaluated sources. The device with the best average performance was the halogen light, followed by the 3M/ESPE LED. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the LEDs may be indicated in orthodontic practice, as long as a protocol is used for the application of light with the activation time of 40 seconds.
id DPI-1_2f16d814394977a58f9a8724395bbdc2
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2176-94512013000100007
network_acronym_str DPI-1
network_name_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository_id_str
spelling Halogen light versus LED for bracket bonding: shear bond strengthOrthodonticsShear bond strengthOrthodontic bracketsDental bondingINTRODUCTION: LED light-curing devices seek to provide a cold light activator which allows protocols of material polymerization with shorter duration. OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength of bracket bonding using three types of light-curing devices: One with halogen light (Optilight Plus - Gnatus) and two with LEDs (Optilight CL - Gnatus and Elipar Freelight - 3M/ESPE). RESULTS: Comparing the results by analysis of variance, the Gnatus LED device showed an inferior statistical behavior in relation to other light sources, when activated by a short time. But, when it was used for 40 seconds, the polymerization results were consistent with the other evaluated sources. The device with the best average performance was the halogen light, followed by the 3M/ESPE LED. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the LEDs may be indicated in orthodontic practice, as long as a protocol is used for the application of light with the activation time of 40 seconds.Dental Press International2013-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512013000100007Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.18 n.1 2013reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/S2176-94512013000100007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho,Paulo Eduardo GuedesSantos,Valdemir Muzulon dosIsber,HassanCotrim-Ferreira,Flávio Augustoeng2013-05-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512013000100007Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2013-05-15T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Halogen light versus LED for bracket bonding: shear bond strength
title Halogen light versus LED for bracket bonding: shear bond strength
spellingShingle Halogen light versus LED for bracket bonding: shear bond strength
Carvalho,Paulo Eduardo Guedes
Orthodontics
Shear bond strength
Orthodontic brackets
Dental bonding
title_short Halogen light versus LED for bracket bonding: shear bond strength
title_full Halogen light versus LED for bracket bonding: shear bond strength
title_fullStr Halogen light versus LED for bracket bonding: shear bond strength
title_full_unstemmed Halogen light versus LED for bracket bonding: shear bond strength
title_sort Halogen light versus LED for bracket bonding: shear bond strength
author Carvalho,Paulo Eduardo Guedes
author_facet Carvalho,Paulo Eduardo Guedes
Santos,Valdemir Muzulon dos
Isber,Hassan
Cotrim-Ferreira,Flávio Augusto
author_role author
author2 Santos,Valdemir Muzulon dos
Isber,Hassan
Cotrim-Ferreira,Flávio Augusto
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho,Paulo Eduardo Guedes
Santos,Valdemir Muzulon dos
Isber,Hassan
Cotrim-Ferreira,Flávio Augusto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Orthodontics
Shear bond strength
Orthodontic brackets
Dental bonding
topic Orthodontics
Shear bond strength
Orthodontic brackets
Dental bonding
description INTRODUCTION: LED light-curing devices seek to provide a cold light activator which allows protocols of material polymerization with shorter duration. OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength of bracket bonding using three types of light-curing devices: One with halogen light (Optilight Plus - Gnatus) and two with LEDs (Optilight CL - Gnatus and Elipar Freelight - 3M/ESPE). RESULTS: Comparing the results by analysis of variance, the Gnatus LED device showed an inferior statistical behavior in relation to other light sources, when activated by a short time. But, when it was used for 40 seconds, the polymerization results were consistent with the other evaluated sources. The device with the best average performance was the halogen light, followed by the 3M/ESPE LED. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the LEDs may be indicated in orthodontic practice, as long as a protocol is used for the application of light with the activation time of 40 seconds.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512013000100007
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512013000100007
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S2176-94512013000100007
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.18 n.1 2013
reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
instname:Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron:DPI
instname_str Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron_str DPI
institution DPI
reponame_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
collection Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com
_version_ 1754122396361555968