Analysis of width/height ratio and gingival zenith in patients with bilateral agenesis of maxillary lateral incisor

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pini,Núbia Inocencya Pavesi
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: De-Marchi,Luciana Manzotti, Gribel,Bruno Frazão, Ramos,Adilson Luiz, Furquim,Laurindo Zanco, Pascotto,Renata Corrêa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000500013
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the width/length ratio and the gingival zenith (GZ), by means of dental casts and digital caliper, in patients with missing maxillary lateral incisors after treatment. METHODS: The sample was composed of 52 subjects divided into 3 groups: BRG (n = 18), patients with bilateral agenesis treated with tooth re-contouring; BIG (n = 10) patients with agenesis treated with implants and CG (n = 24), control group. The data were analyzed using Shapiro-Wilk, Spearman correlation, Wilcoxon, Kruskal-Wallis, t test and ANOVA tests (p < 0.05). RESULTS: For the width/length ratio of the lateral incisors, BIG presented the lowest mean values (0.72 right and left), when compared with other groups. However, comparison between groups presented statistically significant differences for the right lateral incisor (BIG x CG) and for the canine (BRG x CG). GZ data evaluation showed the greatest difference for BRG (0.5 right and 0.48 left). BIG (0.95 right and 0.98 left) and CG (0.98 right and 0.8 left) presented more similar values, nevertheless, without statistical difference (p &gt; 0.05). GZ data for the right and left sides of the smile were not considered statistically different. CONCLUSION: Although no statistical difference was found in the comparison between the groups, analysis of the descriptive values showed that group BIG showed the greatest difference in values with regard to width/length ratio. Regarding gingival zenith, BRG showed the greatest difference.
id DPI-1_46a1a9aa21a407de348097d5033c3fe2
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2176-94512012000500013
network_acronym_str DPI-1
network_name_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository_id_str
spelling Analysis of width/height ratio and gingival zenith in patients with bilateral agenesis of maxillary lateral incisorDental agenesisWidth/length ratioGingival zenithOBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the width/length ratio and the gingival zenith (GZ), by means of dental casts and digital caliper, in patients with missing maxillary lateral incisors after treatment. METHODS: The sample was composed of 52 subjects divided into 3 groups: BRG (n = 18), patients with bilateral agenesis treated with tooth re-contouring; BIG (n = 10) patients with agenesis treated with implants and CG (n = 24), control group. The data were analyzed using Shapiro-Wilk, Spearman correlation, Wilcoxon, Kruskal-Wallis, t test and ANOVA tests (p < 0.05). RESULTS: For the width/length ratio of the lateral incisors, BIG presented the lowest mean values (0.72 right and left), when compared with other groups. However, comparison between groups presented statistically significant differences for the right lateral incisor (BIG x CG) and for the canine (BRG x CG). GZ data evaluation showed the greatest difference for BRG (0.5 right and 0.48 left). BIG (0.95 right and 0.98 left) and CG (0.98 right and 0.8 left) presented more similar values, nevertheless, without statistical difference (p &gt; 0.05). GZ data for the right and left sides of the smile were not considered statistically different. CONCLUSION: Although no statistical difference was found in the comparison between the groups, analysis of the descriptive values showed that group BIG showed the greatest difference in values with regard to width/length ratio. Regarding gingival zenith, BRG showed the greatest difference.Dental Press International2012-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000500013Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.17 n.5 2012reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/S2176-94512012000500013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPini,Núbia Inocencya PavesiDe-Marchi,Luciana ManzottiGribel,Bruno FrazãoRamos,Adilson LuizFurquim,Laurindo ZancoPascotto,Renata Corrêaeng2012-11-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512012000500013Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2012-11-27T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of width/height ratio and gingival zenith in patients with bilateral agenesis of maxillary lateral incisor
title Analysis of width/height ratio and gingival zenith in patients with bilateral agenesis of maxillary lateral incisor
spellingShingle Analysis of width/height ratio and gingival zenith in patients with bilateral agenesis of maxillary lateral incisor
Pini,Núbia Inocencya Pavesi
Dental agenesis
Width/length ratio
Gingival zenith
title_short Analysis of width/height ratio and gingival zenith in patients with bilateral agenesis of maxillary lateral incisor
title_full Analysis of width/height ratio and gingival zenith in patients with bilateral agenesis of maxillary lateral incisor
title_fullStr Analysis of width/height ratio and gingival zenith in patients with bilateral agenesis of maxillary lateral incisor
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of width/height ratio and gingival zenith in patients with bilateral agenesis of maxillary lateral incisor
title_sort Analysis of width/height ratio and gingival zenith in patients with bilateral agenesis of maxillary lateral incisor
author Pini,Núbia Inocencya Pavesi
author_facet Pini,Núbia Inocencya Pavesi
De-Marchi,Luciana Manzotti
Gribel,Bruno Frazão
Ramos,Adilson Luiz
Furquim,Laurindo Zanco
Pascotto,Renata Corrêa
author_role author
author2 De-Marchi,Luciana Manzotti
Gribel,Bruno Frazão
Ramos,Adilson Luiz
Furquim,Laurindo Zanco
Pascotto,Renata Corrêa
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pini,Núbia Inocencya Pavesi
De-Marchi,Luciana Manzotti
Gribel,Bruno Frazão
Ramos,Adilson Luiz
Furquim,Laurindo Zanco
Pascotto,Renata Corrêa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dental agenesis
Width/length ratio
Gingival zenith
topic Dental agenesis
Width/length ratio
Gingival zenith
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the width/length ratio and the gingival zenith (GZ), by means of dental casts and digital caliper, in patients with missing maxillary lateral incisors after treatment. METHODS: The sample was composed of 52 subjects divided into 3 groups: BRG (n = 18), patients with bilateral agenesis treated with tooth re-contouring; BIG (n = 10) patients with agenesis treated with implants and CG (n = 24), control group. The data were analyzed using Shapiro-Wilk, Spearman correlation, Wilcoxon, Kruskal-Wallis, t test and ANOVA tests (p < 0.05). RESULTS: For the width/length ratio of the lateral incisors, BIG presented the lowest mean values (0.72 right and left), when compared with other groups. However, comparison between groups presented statistically significant differences for the right lateral incisor (BIG x CG) and for the canine (BRG x CG). GZ data evaluation showed the greatest difference for BRG (0.5 right and 0.48 left). BIG (0.95 right and 0.98 left) and CG (0.98 right and 0.8 left) presented more similar values, nevertheless, without statistical difference (p &gt; 0.05). GZ data for the right and left sides of the smile were not considered statistically different. CONCLUSION: Although no statistical difference was found in the comparison between the groups, analysis of the descriptive values showed that group BIG showed the greatest difference in values with regard to width/length ratio. Regarding gingival zenith, BRG showed the greatest difference.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000500013
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000500013
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S2176-94512012000500013
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.17 n.5 2012
reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
instname:Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron:DPI
instname_str Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron_str DPI
institution DPI
reponame_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
collection Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com
_version_ 1754122396045934592