What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: SOUZA,Denise Bitencourt de
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: OLIVEIRA,Adriana Ismerim, GOUVÊA,Giovana Renata, SANTAMARIA-JR,Milton
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512022000400302
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the influence of anteroposterior position of the soft tissue on facial attractiveness in black people, and compare the perception of aesthetics and satisfaction between orthodontists and black laypersons. Methods: The sample was composed of 69 orthodontists and 69 laypersons of black ethnicity (n=138). Facial profile photographs of two black volunteers, a man and a woman, were digitally manipulated to change the position of the lips and chin, by making gradual changes of 4mm in relation to the true vertical line, simulating advance or retrusion of the soft tissues by -2, -6, -10, +2, +6, +10mm, totalling six images per sex. The photographs were classified by the research participants using a visual analogue scale (VAS), from 0 (unpleasant) to 100 (pleasant). The results were analyzed by generalized linear model and by the Fisher’s exact test, considering the level of significance of 5%. Results: The orthodontists and black laypersons considered straight profiles the most pleasant. The two groups classified the male profile as being more unpleasant in comparison with the female facial profile, which was concave. When evaluating all the images together, the image most indicated as being the most pleasant, once again, was the one with the straight profile, for both sexes. Conclusion: The influence of orthodontists’ and laypersons’ aesthetic perception on evaluating the facial profile of blacks was similar. The straight profile was classified as the most pleasant and the concave, as the most unpleasant.
id DPI-1_6fbea174ad5e03365861c9192de5d71d
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2176-94512022000400302
network_acronym_str DPI-1
network_name_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository_id_str
spelling What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersonsPerceptionFaceLipChinABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the influence of anteroposterior position of the soft tissue on facial attractiveness in black people, and compare the perception of aesthetics and satisfaction between orthodontists and black laypersons. Methods: The sample was composed of 69 orthodontists and 69 laypersons of black ethnicity (n=138). Facial profile photographs of two black volunteers, a man and a woman, were digitally manipulated to change the position of the lips and chin, by making gradual changes of 4mm in relation to the true vertical line, simulating advance or retrusion of the soft tissues by -2, -6, -10, +2, +6, +10mm, totalling six images per sex. The photographs were classified by the research participants using a visual analogue scale (VAS), from 0 (unpleasant) to 100 (pleasant). The results were analyzed by generalized linear model and by the Fisher’s exact test, considering the level of significance of 5%. Results: The orthodontists and black laypersons considered straight profiles the most pleasant. The two groups classified the male profile as being more unpleasant in comparison with the female facial profile, which was concave. When evaluating all the images together, the image most indicated as being the most pleasant, once again, was the one with the straight profile, for both sexes. Conclusion: The influence of orthodontists’ and laypersons’ aesthetic perception on evaluating the facial profile of blacks was similar. The straight profile was classified as the most pleasant and the concave, as the most unpleasant.Dental Press International2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512022000400302Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.27 n.4 2022reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/2177-6709.27.4.e2220519.oarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSOUZA,Denise Bitencourt deOLIVEIRA,Adriana IsmerimGOUVÊA,Giovana RenataSANTAMARIA-JR,Miltoneng2022-08-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512022000400302Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2022-08-30T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons
title What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons
spellingShingle What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons
SOUZA,Denise Bitencourt de
Perception
Face
Lip
Chin
title_short What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons
title_full What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons
title_fullStr What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons
title_full_unstemmed What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons
title_sort What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons
author SOUZA,Denise Bitencourt de
author_facet SOUZA,Denise Bitencourt de
OLIVEIRA,Adriana Ismerim
GOUVÊA,Giovana Renata
SANTAMARIA-JR,Milton
author_role author
author2 OLIVEIRA,Adriana Ismerim
GOUVÊA,Giovana Renata
SANTAMARIA-JR,Milton
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv SOUZA,Denise Bitencourt de
OLIVEIRA,Adriana Ismerim
GOUVÊA,Giovana Renata
SANTAMARIA-JR,Milton
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Perception
Face
Lip
Chin
topic Perception
Face
Lip
Chin
description ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the influence of anteroposterior position of the soft tissue on facial attractiveness in black people, and compare the perception of aesthetics and satisfaction between orthodontists and black laypersons. Methods: The sample was composed of 69 orthodontists and 69 laypersons of black ethnicity (n=138). Facial profile photographs of two black volunteers, a man and a woman, were digitally manipulated to change the position of the lips and chin, by making gradual changes of 4mm in relation to the true vertical line, simulating advance or retrusion of the soft tissues by -2, -6, -10, +2, +6, +10mm, totalling six images per sex. The photographs were classified by the research participants using a visual analogue scale (VAS), from 0 (unpleasant) to 100 (pleasant). The results were analyzed by generalized linear model and by the Fisher’s exact test, considering the level of significance of 5%. Results: The orthodontists and black laypersons considered straight profiles the most pleasant. The two groups classified the male profile as being more unpleasant in comparison with the female facial profile, which was concave. When evaluating all the images together, the image most indicated as being the most pleasant, once again, was the one with the straight profile, for both sexes. Conclusion: The influence of orthodontists’ and laypersons’ aesthetic perception on evaluating the facial profile of blacks was similar. The straight profile was classified as the most pleasant and the concave, as the most unpleasant.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512022000400302
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512022000400302
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2177-6709.27.4.e2220519.oar
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.27 n.4 2022
reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
instname:Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron:DPI
instname_str Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron_str DPI
institution DPI
reponame_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
collection Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com
_version_ 1754122399147622400