What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512022000400302 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the influence of anteroposterior position of the soft tissue on facial attractiveness in black people, and compare the perception of aesthetics and satisfaction between orthodontists and black laypersons. Methods: The sample was composed of 69 orthodontists and 69 laypersons of black ethnicity (n=138). Facial profile photographs of two black volunteers, a man and a woman, were digitally manipulated to change the position of the lips and chin, by making gradual changes of 4mm in relation to the true vertical line, simulating advance or retrusion of the soft tissues by -2, -6, -10, +2, +6, +10mm, totalling six images per sex. The photographs were classified by the research participants using a visual analogue scale (VAS), from 0 (unpleasant) to 100 (pleasant). The results were analyzed by generalized linear model and by the Fisher’s exact test, considering the level of significance of 5%. Results: The orthodontists and black laypersons considered straight profiles the most pleasant. The two groups classified the male profile as being more unpleasant in comparison with the female facial profile, which was concave. When evaluating all the images together, the image most indicated as being the most pleasant, once again, was the one with the straight profile, for both sexes. Conclusion: The influence of orthodontists’ and laypersons’ aesthetic perception on evaluating the facial profile of blacks was similar. The straight profile was classified as the most pleasant and the concave, as the most unpleasant. |
id |
DPI-1_6fbea174ad5e03365861c9192de5d71d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2176-94512022000400302 |
network_acronym_str |
DPI-1 |
network_name_str |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersonsPerceptionFaceLipChinABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the influence of anteroposterior position of the soft tissue on facial attractiveness in black people, and compare the perception of aesthetics and satisfaction between orthodontists and black laypersons. Methods: The sample was composed of 69 orthodontists and 69 laypersons of black ethnicity (n=138). Facial profile photographs of two black volunteers, a man and a woman, were digitally manipulated to change the position of the lips and chin, by making gradual changes of 4mm in relation to the true vertical line, simulating advance or retrusion of the soft tissues by -2, -6, -10, +2, +6, +10mm, totalling six images per sex. The photographs were classified by the research participants using a visual analogue scale (VAS), from 0 (unpleasant) to 100 (pleasant). The results were analyzed by generalized linear model and by the Fisher’s exact test, considering the level of significance of 5%. Results: The orthodontists and black laypersons considered straight profiles the most pleasant. The two groups classified the male profile as being more unpleasant in comparison with the female facial profile, which was concave. When evaluating all the images together, the image most indicated as being the most pleasant, once again, was the one with the straight profile, for both sexes. Conclusion: The influence of orthodontists’ and laypersons’ aesthetic perception on evaluating the facial profile of blacks was similar. The straight profile was classified as the most pleasant and the concave, as the most unpleasant.Dental Press International2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512022000400302Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.27 n.4 2022reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/2177-6709.27.4.e2220519.oarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSOUZA,Denise Bitencourt deOLIVEIRA,Adriana IsmerimGOUVÊA,Giovana RenataSANTAMARIA-JR,Miltoneng2022-08-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512022000400302Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2022-08-30T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons |
title |
What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons |
spellingShingle |
What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons SOUZA,Denise Bitencourt de Perception Face Lip Chin |
title_short |
What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons |
title_full |
What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons |
title_fullStr |
What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons |
title_full_unstemmed |
What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons |
title_sort |
What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons |
author |
SOUZA,Denise Bitencourt de |
author_facet |
SOUZA,Denise Bitencourt de OLIVEIRA,Adriana Ismerim GOUVÊA,Giovana Renata SANTAMARIA-JR,Milton |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
OLIVEIRA,Adriana Ismerim GOUVÊA,Giovana Renata SANTAMARIA-JR,Milton |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
SOUZA,Denise Bitencourt de OLIVEIRA,Adriana Ismerim GOUVÊA,Giovana Renata SANTAMARIA-JR,Milton |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Perception Face Lip Chin |
topic |
Perception Face Lip Chin |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the influence of anteroposterior position of the soft tissue on facial attractiveness in black people, and compare the perception of aesthetics and satisfaction between orthodontists and black laypersons. Methods: The sample was composed of 69 orthodontists and 69 laypersons of black ethnicity (n=138). Facial profile photographs of two black volunteers, a man and a woman, were digitally manipulated to change the position of the lips and chin, by making gradual changes of 4mm in relation to the true vertical line, simulating advance or retrusion of the soft tissues by -2, -6, -10, +2, +6, +10mm, totalling six images per sex. The photographs were classified by the research participants using a visual analogue scale (VAS), from 0 (unpleasant) to 100 (pleasant). The results were analyzed by generalized linear model and by the Fisher’s exact test, considering the level of significance of 5%. Results: The orthodontists and black laypersons considered straight profiles the most pleasant. The two groups classified the male profile as being more unpleasant in comparison with the female facial profile, which was concave. When evaluating all the images together, the image most indicated as being the most pleasant, once again, was the one with the straight profile, for both sexes. Conclusion: The influence of orthodontists’ and laypersons’ aesthetic perception on evaluating the facial profile of blacks was similar. The straight profile was classified as the most pleasant and the concave, as the most unpleasant. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512022000400302 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512022000400302 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/2177-6709.27.4.e2220519.oar |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press International |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press International |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.27 n.4 2022 reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics instname:Dental Press International (DPI) instacron:DPI |
instname_str |
Dental Press International (DPI) |
instacron_str |
DPI |
institution |
DPI |
reponame_str |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
collection |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com |
_version_ |
1754122399147622400 |