Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographs

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Flores-Mir,Carlos
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Rosenblatt,Mark R, Major,Paul W., Carey,Jason P., Heo,Giseon
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512014000500045
Resumo: INTRODUCTION: This in vivo study assessed accuracy and reliability of tooth length measurements obtained from conventional panoramic radiographs and CBCT panoramic reconstructions to that of a digital caliper (gold standard). METHODS: The sample consisted of subjects who had CBCT and conventional panoramic radiographic imaging and who required maxillary premolar extraction for routine orthodontic treatment. A total of 48 teeth extracted from 26 subjects were measured directly with digital calipers. Radiographic images were scanned and digitally measured in Dolphin 3D software. Accuracy of tooth length measurements made by CBCT panoramic reconstructions, conventional panoramic radiographs and digital caliper (gold standard) were compared to each other by repeated measures one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction and by single measures intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Repeated root length measures with digital calipers, panoramic radiographs and CBCT constructed panoramic-like images were all individually highly reliable. Compared to the caliper (gold standard), tooth measurements obtained from conventional panoramic radiographs were on average 6.3 mm (SD = 2.0 mm) longer, while tooth measurements from CBCT panoramic reconstructions were an average of 1.7 mm (SD = 1.2 mm) shorter. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to actual tooth lengths, conventional panoramic radiographs were relatively inaccurate, overestimating the lengths by 29%, while CBCT panoramic reconstructions underestimated the lengths by 4%.
id DPI-1_9127065b4f5203ea64c8bcfd547819d2
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2176-94512014000500045
network_acronym_str DPI-1
network_name_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository_id_str
spelling Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographsReproducibility of resultsRadiographyTooth root INTRODUCTION: This in vivo study assessed accuracy and reliability of tooth length measurements obtained from conventional panoramic radiographs and CBCT panoramic reconstructions to that of a digital caliper (gold standard). METHODS: The sample consisted of subjects who had CBCT and conventional panoramic radiographic imaging and who required maxillary premolar extraction for routine orthodontic treatment. A total of 48 teeth extracted from 26 subjects were measured directly with digital calipers. Radiographic images were scanned and digitally measured in Dolphin 3D software. Accuracy of tooth length measurements made by CBCT panoramic reconstructions, conventional panoramic radiographs and digital caliper (gold standard) were compared to each other by repeated measures one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction and by single measures intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Repeated root length measures with digital calipers, panoramic radiographs and CBCT constructed panoramic-like images were all individually highly reliable. Compared to the caliper (gold standard), tooth measurements obtained from conventional panoramic radiographs were on average 6.3 mm (SD = 2.0 mm) longer, while tooth measurements from CBCT panoramic reconstructions were an average of 1.7 mm (SD = 1.2 mm) shorter. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to actual tooth lengths, conventional panoramic radiographs were relatively inaccurate, overestimating the lengths by 29%, while CBCT panoramic reconstructions underestimated the lengths by 4%. Dental Press International2014-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512014000500045Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.19 n.5 2014reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/2176-9451.19.5.045-053.oarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFlores-Mir,CarlosRosenblatt,Mark RMajor,Paul W.Carey,Jason P.Heo,Giseoneng2015-08-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512014000500045Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2015-08-24T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographs
title Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographs
spellingShingle Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographs
Flores-Mir,Carlos
Reproducibility of results
Radiography
Tooth root
title_short Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographs
title_full Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographs
title_fullStr Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographs
title_full_unstemmed Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographs
title_sort Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographs
author Flores-Mir,Carlos
author_facet Flores-Mir,Carlos
Rosenblatt,Mark R
Major,Paul W.
Carey,Jason P.
Heo,Giseon
author_role author
author2 Rosenblatt,Mark R
Major,Paul W.
Carey,Jason P.
Heo,Giseon
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Flores-Mir,Carlos
Rosenblatt,Mark R
Major,Paul W.
Carey,Jason P.
Heo,Giseon
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Reproducibility of results
Radiography
Tooth root
topic Reproducibility of results
Radiography
Tooth root
description INTRODUCTION: This in vivo study assessed accuracy and reliability of tooth length measurements obtained from conventional panoramic radiographs and CBCT panoramic reconstructions to that of a digital caliper (gold standard). METHODS: The sample consisted of subjects who had CBCT and conventional panoramic radiographic imaging and who required maxillary premolar extraction for routine orthodontic treatment. A total of 48 teeth extracted from 26 subjects were measured directly with digital calipers. Radiographic images were scanned and digitally measured in Dolphin 3D software. Accuracy of tooth length measurements made by CBCT panoramic reconstructions, conventional panoramic radiographs and digital caliper (gold standard) were compared to each other by repeated measures one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction and by single measures intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Repeated root length measures with digital calipers, panoramic radiographs and CBCT constructed panoramic-like images were all individually highly reliable. Compared to the caliper (gold standard), tooth measurements obtained from conventional panoramic radiographs were on average 6.3 mm (SD = 2.0 mm) longer, while tooth measurements from CBCT panoramic reconstructions were an average of 1.7 mm (SD = 1.2 mm) shorter. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to actual tooth lengths, conventional panoramic radiographs were relatively inaccurate, overestimating the lengths by 29%, while CBCT panoramic reconstructions underestimated the lengths by 4%.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512014000500045
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512014000500045
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2176-9451.19.5.045-053.oar
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.19 n.5 2014
reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
instname:Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron:DPI
instname_str Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron_str DPI
institution DPI
reponame_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
collection Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com
_version_ 1754122397165813760