Mechanical evaluation of quad-helix appliance made of low-nickel stainless steel wire

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos,Rogério Lacerda dos
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Pithon,Matheus Melo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512013000300007
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that there is no difference between stainless steel and low-nickel stainless steel wires as regards mechanical behavior. Force, resilience, and elastic modulus produced by Quad-helix appliances made of 0.032-inch and 0.036-inch wires were evaluated. METHODS: Sixty Quad-helix appliances were made, thirty for each type of alloy, being fifteen for each wire thickness, 0.032-in and 0.036-in. All the archwires were submitted to mechanical compression test using an EMIC DL-10000 machine simulating activations of 4, 6, 9, and 12 mm. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with multiple comparisons and Tukey's test were used (p < 0.05) to assess force, resilience, and elastic modulus. RESULTS: Statistically significant difference in the forces generated, resilience and elastic modulus were found between the 0.032-in 0.036-in thicknesses (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Appliances made of low-nickel stainless steel alloy had force, resilience, and elastic modulus similar to those made of stainless steel alloy.
id DPI-1_d70f95a8c2c0160262522715d4766e4e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2176-94512013000300007
network_acronym_str DPI-1
network_name_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository_id_str
spelling Mechanical evaluation of quad-helix appliance made of low-nickel stainless steel wireOrthodontic appliancesHypersensitivityNickelOBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that there is no difference between stainless steel and low-nickel stainless steel wires as regards mechanical behavior. Force, resilience, and elastic modulus produced by Quad-helix appliances made of 0.032-inch and 0.036-inch wires were evaluated. METHODS: Sixty Quad-helix appliances were made, thirty for each type of alloy, being fifteen for each wire thickness, 0.032-in and 0.036-in. All the archwires were submitted to mechanical compression test using an EMIC DL-10000 machine simulating activations of 4, 6, 9, and 12 mm. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with multiple comparisons and Tukey's test were used (p < 0.05) to assess force, resilience, and elastic modulus. RESULTS: Statistically significant difference in the forces generated, resilience and elastic modulus were found between the 0.032-in 0.036-in thicknesses (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Appliances made of low-nickel stainless steel alloy had force, resilience, and elastic modulus similar to those made of stainless steel alloy.Dental Press International2013-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512013000300007Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.18 n.3 2013reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/S2176-94512013000300007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos,Rogério Lacerda dosPithon,Matheus Meloeng2013-10-31T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512013000300007Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2013-10-31T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mechanical evaluation of quad-helix appliance made of low-nickel stainless steel wire
title Mechanical evaluation of quad-helix appliance made of low-nickel stainless steel wire
spellingShingle Mechanical evaluation of quad-helix appliance made of low-nickel stainless steel wire
Santos,Rogério Lacerda dos
Orthodontic appliances
Hypersensitivity
Nickel
title_short Mechanical evaluation of quad-helix appliance made of low-nickel stainless steel wire
title_full Mechanical evaluation of quad-helix appliance made of low-nickel stainless steel wire
title_fullStr Mechanical evaluation of quad-helix appliance made of low-nickel stainless steel wire
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical evaluation of quad-helix appliance made of low-nickel stainless steel wire
title_sort Mechanical evaluation of quad-helix appliance made of low-nickel stainless steel wire
author Santos,Rogério Lacerda dos
author_facet Santos,Rogério Lacerda dos
Pithon,Matheus Melo
author_role author
author2 Pithon,Matheus Melo
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos,Rogério Lacerda dos
Pithon,Matheus Melo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Orthodontic appliances
Hypersensitivity
Nickel
topic Orthodontic appliances
Hypersensitivity
Nickel
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that there is no difference between stainless steel and low-nickel stainless steel wires as regards mechanical behavior. Force, resilience, and elastic modulus produced by Quad-helix appliances made of 0.032-inch and 0.036-inch wires were evaluated. METHODS: Sixty Quad-helix appliances were made, thirty for each type of alloy, being fifteen for each wire thickness, 0.032-in and 0.036-in. All the archwires were submitted to mechanical compression test using an EMIC DL-10000 machine simulating activations of 4, 6, 9, and 12 mm. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with multiple comparisons and Tukey's test were used (p < 0.05) to assess force, resilience, and elastic modulus. RESULTS: Statistically significant difference in the forces generated, resilience and elastic modulus were found between the 0.032-in 0.036-in thicknesses (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Appliances made of low-nickel stainless steel alloy had force, resilience, and elastic modulus similar to those made of stainless steel alloy.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512013000300007
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512013000300007
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S2176-94512013000300007
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.18 n.3 2013
reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
instname:Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron:DPI
instname_str Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron_str DPI
institution DPI
reponame_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
collection Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com
_version_ 1754122396433907712