Evaluation of palatal arches made from low-nickel stainless steel wire

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Rogério Lacerda dos
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Pithon, Matheus Melo, Souza, Margareth Maria Gomes de, Bolognese, Ana Maria, Araújo, Mônica Tirre de Souza
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8642141
Resumo: Aim: To test the hypothesis that there is no difference between stainless steel wires and low-nickel stainless steel ones regarding their mechanical behavior. Force, resilience and elasticity modulus produced by Coffin, “W” arch, and Quad-helix appliances made of 0.032-inch and 0.036-inch wires were evaluated. Methods: Fifteen appliances of each type (Coffin, “W” arch, and Quad-helix) were made according to metal alloy and wire thickness. All arches (12 groups of 15 appliances each) were submitted to mechanical compression test by using an EMIC DL-10000 machine simulating activations of 5, 8, 10, and 12 mm. Analysis of variance with multiple comparisons and Tukey’s test were used (P < 0.05) for analyzing statistically force and resilience data. Results: The results showed that mechanical properties depended on shape of the appliance, diameter of the wire, amount of activation, and metal alloy. Conclusions: Appliances made from lownickel stainless steel alloy had higher release of force, resilience and elasticity modulus compared to those made of stainless steel alloy.
id UNICAMP-8_a923f680b8934132df92e73c08c4cb09
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8642141
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of palatal arches made from low-nickel stainless steel wireOrthodonticsMalocclusionNickelHypersensitivityOdontologyAim: To test the hypothesis that there is no difference between stainless steel wires and low-nickel stainless steel ones regarding their mechanical behavior. Force, resilience and elasticity modulus produced by Coffin, “W” arch, and Quad-helix appliances made of 0.032-inch and 0.036-inch wires were evaluated. Methods: Fifteen appliances of each type (Coffin, “W” arch, and Quad-helix) were made according to metal alloy and wire thickness. All arches (12 groups of 15 appliances each) were submitted to mechanical compression test by using an EMIC DL-10000 machine simulating activations of 5, 8, 10, and 12 mm. Analysis of variance with multiple comparisons and Tukey’s test were used (P < 0.05) for analyzing statistically force and resilience data. Results: The results showed that mechanical properties depended on shape of the appliance, diameter of the wire, amount of activation, and metal alloy. Conclusions: Appliances made from lownickel stainless steel alloy had higher release of force, resilience and elasticity modulus compared to those made of stainless steel alloy.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2015-12-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/864214110.20396/bjos.v8i3.8642141Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 8 n. 3 (2009): Jul./Sep.; 149-153Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 8 No. 3 (2009): Jul./Sep.; 149-1531677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8642141/9634Santos, Rogério Lacerda dosPithon, Matheus MeloSouza, Margareth Maria Gomes deBolognese, Ana MariaAraújo, Mônica Tirre de Souzainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-02-25T09:18:23Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8642141Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2016-02-25T09:18:23Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of palatal arches made from low-nickel stainless steel wire
title Evaluation of palatal arches made from low-nickel stainless steel wire
spellingShingle Evaluation of palatal arches made from low-nickel stainless steel wire
Santos, Rogério Lacerda dos
Orthodontics
Malocclusion
Nickel
Hypersensitivity
Odontology
title_short Evaluation of palatal arches made from low-nickel stainless steel wire
title_full Evaluation of palatal arches made from low-nickel stainless steel wire
title_fullStr Evaluation of palatal arches made from low-nickel stainless steel wire
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of palatal arches made from low-nickel stainless steel wire
title_sort Evaluation of palatal arches made from low-nickel stainless steel wire
author Santos, Rogério Lacerda dos
author_facet Santos, Rogério Lacerda dos
Pithon, Matheus Melo
Souza, Margareth Maria Gomes de
Bolognese, Ana Maria
Araújo, Mônica Tirre de Souza
author_role author
author2 Pithon, Matheus Melo
Souza, Margareth Maria Gomes de
Bolognese, Ana Maria
Araújo, Mônica Tirre de Souza
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Rogério Lacerda dos
Pithon, Matheus Melo
Souza, Margareth Maria Gomes de
Bolognese, Ana Maria
Araújo, Mônica Tirre de Souza
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Orthodontics
Malocclusion
Nickel
Hypersensitivity
Odontology
topic Orthodontics
Malocclusion
Nickel
Hypersensitivity
Odontology
description Aim: To test the hypothesis that there is no difference between stainless steel wires and low-nickel stainless steel ones regarding their mechanical behavior. Force, resilience and elasticity modulus produced by Coffin, “W” arch, and Quad-helix appliances made of 0.032-inch and 0.036-inch wires were evaluated. Methods: Fifteen appliances of each type (Coffin, “W” arch, and Quad-helix) were made according to metal alloy and wire thickness. All arches (12 groups of 15 appliances each) were submitted to mechanical compression test by using an EMIC DL-10000 machine simulating activations of 5, 8, 10, and 12 mm. Analysis of variance with multiple comparisons and Tukey’s test were used (P < 0.05) for analyzing statistically force and resilience data. Results: The results showed that mechanical properties depended on shape of the appliance, diameter of the wire, amount of activation, and metal alloy. Conclusions: Appliances made from lownickel stainless steel alloy had higher release of force, resilience and elasticity modulus compared to those made of stainless steel alloy.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8642141
10.20396/bjos.v8i3.8642141
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8642141
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v8i3.8642141
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8642141/9634
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 8 n. 3 (2009): Jul./Sep.; 149-153
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 8 No. 3 (2009): Jul./Sep.; 149-153
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216400655024128