The Superior Court of Justice and the protection of the family asset: judicial activism or preservation of minimum heritage?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Maria Fernanda César Las Casas de
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Toledo, Renata Maria Silveira, Santos, Joao Paulo Marques dos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/260
Resumo: The purpose of this article is to discuss the modalities of Family Good, admitted in the Brazilian legal system, either through the legal or jurisprudential way. The investigation starts from a historical bias, starting from the premises that the principles of the dignity of the human person and the minimum patrimony, recognized, above all by Luiz Edson Fachin, are recognized in the organization itself. The article presents a brief analysis of the position of the STJ Judges, in order to know if, in cases of decisions related to the Family Welfare, this court had an activist stance or preservation of the minimum patrimony. The research adopted the methodology of bibliographic review to raise the state of the art, as well as the jurisprudential review to evaluate how the courts decide, concluding about the existence or not of judicial activism.
id DPU_1866def9ad55785a74d422c7559ce0f2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.172.28.97.76:article/260
network_acronym_str DPU
network_name_str Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The Superior Court of Justice and the protection of the family asset: judicial activism or preservation of minimum heritage?El Superior Tribunal de Justicia y la protección del bien de familia: ¿activismo judicial o preservación del patrimonio mínimo?O Superior Tribunal de Justiça e a proteção do bem de família: ativismo judicial ou preservação do patrimônio mínimo?Bien de familia. Activismo judicial. Patrimonio mínimo.Bem de família. Ativismo judicial. Patrimônio mínimo.HomesteadJudicial ActivismMinimum AssetsThe purpose of this article is to discuss the modalities of Family Good, admitted in the Brazilian legal system, either through the legal or jurisprudential way. The investigation starts from a historical bias, starting from the premises that the principles of the dignity of the human person and the minimum patrimony, recognized, above all by Luiz Edson Fachin, are recognized in the organization itself. The article presents a brief analysis of the position of the STJ Judges, in order to know if, in cases of decisions related to the Family Welfare, this court had an activist stance or preservation of the minimum patrimony. The research adopted the methodology of bibliographic review to raise the state of the art, as well as the jurisprudential review to evaluate how the courts decide, concluding about the existence or not of judicial activism.El objetivo de este artículo es discutir las modalidades de Bien de Familia, admitidas en el ordenamiento jurídico brasileño, ya sea por vía legal o jurisprudencial. La investigación se inicia a partir de un sendero histórico, partiendo de las premisas de que se reconocen en el propio ordenamiento los principios de la dignidad de la persona humana y del patrimonio mínimo preconizado, sobre todo por Luiz Edson Fachin. El artículo ofrece un breve análisis de la posición de los juzgados del STJ con el fin de conocer si, en los casos de decisiones relacionadas con el Bien de Familia, este tribunal ha adoptado una postura activista o de preservación del patrimonio mínimo. La investigación adoptó la metodología de la revisión bibliográfica para levantar el estado del arte, así como la revisión jurisprudencial para evaluar cómo deciden los Tribunales, concluyendo sobre la existencia o no del activismo judicial.O objetivo deste artigo é discutir as modalidades de Bem de Família, admitidas no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro, sejam pela via legal ou jurisprudencial. A investigação é iniciada a partir de um viés histórico, partindo das premissas de que é reconhecido no próprio ordenamento os princípios da dignidade da pessoa humana e do patrimônio mínimo, preconizado, sobretudo por Luiz Edson Fachin. O artigo apresenta breve análise sobre o posicionamento de julgados do STJ, a fim de conhecer se, nos casos de decisões relacionadas ao Bem de Família, esse tribunal teve postura ativista ou de preservação do patrimônio mínimo. A pesquisa adotou a metodologia da revisão bibliográfica para levantar o estado da arte, bem como a revisão jurisprudencial para avaliar como decidem os Tribunais, concluindo acerca da existência ou não o ativismo judicial.Escola Nacional da Defensoria Pública da União2019-11-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/26010.46901/revistadadpu.i12.p247-271Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; Núm. 12 (2019): Revista de la Defensoria Publica General de la Unión; 247-271Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; n. 12 (2019): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 247-271Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; No. 12 (2019): Federal Public Defender´´'s Office Journal; 247-2712448-45551984-032210.46901/revistadadpu.i12reponame:Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online)instname:Defensoria Pública da União (DPU)instacron:DPUporhttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/260/193Copyright (c) 2019 Revista da Defensoria Pública da União<!-- Global site tag (gtag.js) - Google Analytics --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=UA-102951275-6"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'UA-102951275-6'); </script>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Maria Fernanda César Las Casas deToledo, Renata Maria SilveiraSantos, Joao Paulo Marques dos2020-10-15T21:32:29Zoai:ojs2.172.28.97.76:article/260Revistahttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/PUBhttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/oaipublicacoes.esdpu@dpu.def.br2448-45551984-0322opendoar:2023-01-12T16:09:34.996578Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) - Defensoria Pública da União (DPU)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Superior Court of Justice and the protection of the family asset: judicial activism or preservation of minimum heritage?
El Superior Tribunal de Justicia y la protección del bien de familia: ¿activismo judicial o preservación del patrimonio mínimo?
O Superior Tribunal de Justiça e a proteção do bem de família: ativismo judicial ou preservação do patrimônio mínimo?
title The Superior Court of Justice and the protection of the family asset: judicial activism or preservation of minimum heritage?
spellingShingle The Superior Court of Justice and the protection of the family asset: judicial activism or preservation of minimum heritage?
Oliveira, Maria Fernanda César Las Casas de
Bien de familia. Activismo judicial. Patrimonio mínimo.
Bem de família. Ativismo judicial. Patrimônio mínimo.
Homestead
Judicial Activism
Minimum Assets
title_short The Superior Court of Justice and the protection of the family asset: judicial activism or preservation of minimum heritage?
title_full The Superior Court of Justice and the protection of the family asset: judicial activism or preservation of minimum heritage?
title_fullStr The Superior Court of Justice and the protection of the family asset: judicial activism or preservation of minimum heritage?
title_full_unstemmed The Superior Court of Justice and the protection of the family asset: judicial activism or preservation of minimum heritage?
title_sort The Superior Court of Justice and the protection of the family asset: judicial activism or preservation of minimum heritage?
author Oliveira, Maria Fernanda César Las Casas de
author_facet Oliveira, Maria Fernanda César Las Casas de
Toledo, Renata Maria Silveira
Santos, Joao Paulo Marques dos
author_role author
author2 Toledo, Renata Maria Silveira
Santos, Joao Paulo Marques dos
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Maria Fernanda César Las Casas de
Toledo, Renata Maria Silveira
Santos, Joao Paulo Marques dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bien de familia. Activismo judicial. Patrimonio mínimo.
Bem de família. Ativismo judicial. Patrimônio mínimo.
Homestead
Judicial Activism
Minimum Assets
topic Bien de familia. Activismo judicial. Patrimonio mínimo.
Bem de família. Ativismo judicial. Patrimônio mínimo.
Homestead
Judicial Activism
Minimum Assets
description The purpose of this article is to discuss the modalities of Family Good, admitted in the Brazilian legal system, either through the legal or jurisprudential way. The investigation starts from a historical bias, starting from the premises that the principles of the dignity of the human person and the minimum patrimony, recognized, above all by Luiz Edson Fachin, are recognized in the organization itself. The article presents a brief analysis of the position of the STJ Judges, in order to know if, in cases of decisions related to the Family Welfare, this court had an activist stance or preservation of the minimum patrimony. The research adopted the methodology of bibliographic review to raise the state of the art, as well as the jurisprudential review to evaluate how the courts decide, concluding about the existence or not of judicial activism.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-11-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/260
10.46901/revistadadpu.i12.p247-271
url https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/260
identifier_str_mv 10.46901/revistadadpu.i12.p247-271
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/260/193
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Nacional da Defensoria Pública da União
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Nacional da Defensoria Pública da União
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; Núm. 12 (2019): Revista de la Defensoria Publica General de la Unión; 247-271
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; n. 12 (2019): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 247-271
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; No. 12 (2019): Federal Public Defender´´'s Office Journal; 247-271
2448-4555
1984-0322
10.46901/revistadadpu.i12
reponame:Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online)
instname:Defensoria Pública da União (DPU)
instacron:DPU
instname_str Defensoria Pública da União (DPU)
instacron_str DPU
institution DPU
reponame_str Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online)
collection Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) - Defensoria Pública da União (DPU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicacoes.esdpu@dpu.def.br
_version_ 1797054102991011840

Registros relacionados