The results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for Federal Judiciary held between 2016 and 2019
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/491 |
Resumo: | This paper is dedicated to investigating the results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for federal judiciary held between 2016 and 2019. In order to reveal whether there were effective results, that is, if the quotas included black people in the position of federal judge. The research dedicated itself to understanding the decisions and strategies adopted in its interpretation and regulation made by the CNJ, as well as in its implementation by the federal regional courts when executing contests. However, in the preliminary phase of the empirical investigation, it was noticed that no black person was approved by the vacancy reservation in the federal regional court that had already applied for the quotas. Thus, the analysis proceeds to characterize and compare the operationalization of the competitions to identify institutional mechanisms, as well as decisions of institutions responding to the implementation and behaviors of the bureaucracy, which may be related to the low effectiveness of the vacancy reserve. Given the ineffectiveness shown by the results, the interpretation addresses the handling of public action instruments, the repertoire and available possibilities put into dialogue with the practices adopted by the courts. The contribution of the work are a diagnosis of the results in the Federal Courts also the presentation of recommendations for the improvement of the implementation (policy brief), elaborated in the light of the current regulations, since, the formulator himself points out antidotes to circumvent a possible low effectiveness. |
id |
DPU_9eb512442c00d02c489ad5ce59f650f8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.172.28.97.76:article/491 |
network_acronym_str |
DPU |
network_name_str |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for Federal Judiciary held between 2016 and 2019A política de cotas para negros nos concursos a magistratura: resultados na Justiça Federal 2016-2019Políticas públicasAções afirmativasCotasPoder judiciárioMagistraturaPublic policyAffirmative actionsQuotasJudiciaryFederal judgeThis paper is dedicated to investigating the results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for federal judiciary held between 2016 and 2019. In order to reveal whether there were effective results, that is, if the quotas included black people in the position of federal judge. The research dedicated itself to understanding the decisions and strategies adopted in its interpretation and regulation made by the CNJ, as well as in its implementation by the federal regional courts when executing contests. However, in the preliminary phase of the empirical investigation, it was noticed that no black person was approved by the vacancy reservation in the federal regional court that had already applied for the quotas. Thus, the analysis proceeds to characterize and compare the operationalization of the competitions to identify institutional mechanisms, as well as decisions of institutions responding to the implementation and behaviors of the bureaucracy, which may be related to the low effectiveness of the vacancy reserve. Given the ineffectiveness shown by the results, the interpretation addresses the handling of public action instruments, the repertoire and available possibilities put into dialogue with the practices adopted by the courts. The contribution of the work are a diagnosis of the results in the Federal Courts also the presentation of recommendations for the improvement of the implementation (policy brief), elaborated in the light of the current regulations, since, the formulator himself points out antidotes to circumvent a possible low effectiveness.Este artigo apresenta os achados da investigação dos resultados da implementação da Resolução nº 203/2015 do Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ), que determina a reserva de 20% das vagas para pessoas negras em todos os concursos do Poder Judiciário. Com foco nos concursos para a magistratura federal, realizados entre 2016 e 2019, o estudo tem o objetivo de revelar se houve resultados efetivos, ou seja, se as cotas incluíram pessoas negras no cargo de juiz federal. A pesquisa, de caráter qualitativo e quantitativo, dedica-se a compreender as decisões e as estratégias adotadas na interpretação e na regulação pelo CNJ, bem como a implementação da resolução pelos tribunais regionais federais (TRF), quando na execução dos certames. O trabalho de descortinar a implementação de tal resolução é necessário para que se revele de que forma a sua operacionalização contribui para que a segregação racial pré-existente no cargo de juiz federal ainda permaneça estável. Assim, diante da inefetividade demonstrada pelos resultados, a interpretação aborda o manejo dos instrumentos da ação pública em diálogo com as práticas adotadas pelos tribunais e a análise prossegue no sentido de caracterizar e comparar a operacionalização dos certames para identificar mecanismos institucionais, decisões e comportamentos da burocracia que possam estar relacionados à baixa efetividade da reserva de vagas. As contribuições deste trabalho são para um diagnóstico dos resultados, apresentando recomendações para o aperfeiçoamento da implementação (policy brief) elaboradas à luz dos normativos vigentes, uma vez que o próprio formulador aponta antídotos para contornar uma possível baixa efetividade.Escola Nacional da Defensoria Pública da União2022-07-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/49110.46901/revistadadpu.i17.p171-186Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; Núm. 17 (2022): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 171-186Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; n. 17 (2022): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 171-186Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; No. 17 (2022): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 171-1862448-45551984-032210.46901/revistadadpu.i17reponame:Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online)instname:Defensoria Pública da União (DPU)instacron:DPUporhttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/491/326Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da Defensoria Pública da Uniãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDantas, Magali2022-07-12T15:15:20Zoai:ojs2.172.28.97.76:article/491Revistahttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/PUBhttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/oaipublicacoes.esdpu@dpu.def.br2448-45551984-0322opendoar:2023-01-12T16:09:38.117819Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) - Defensoria Pública da União (DPU)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for Federal Judiciary held between 2016 and 2019 A política de cotas para negros nos concursos a magistratura: resultados na Justiça Federal 2016-2019 |
title |
The results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for Federal Judiciary held between 2016 and 2019 |
spellingShingle |
The results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for Federal Judiciary held between 2016 and 2019 Dantas, Magali Políticas públicas Ações afirmativas Cotas Poder judiciário Magistratura Public policy Affirmative actions Quotas Judiciary Federal judge |
title_short |
The results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for Federal Judiciary held between 2016 and 2019 |
title_full |
The results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for Federal Judiciary held between 2016 and 2019 |
title_fullStr |
The results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for Federal Judiciary held between 2016 and 2019 |
title_full_unstemmed |
The results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for Federal Judiciary held between 2016 and 2019 |
title_sort |
The results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for Federal Judiciary held between 2016 and 2019 |
author |
Dantas, Magali |
author_facet |
Dantas, Magali |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dantas, Magali |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Políticas públicas Ações afirmativas Cotas Poder judiciário Magistratura Public policy Affirmative actions Quotas Judiciary Federal judge |
topic |
Políticas públicas Ações afirmativas Cotas Poder judiciário Magistratura Public policy Affirmative actions Quotas Judiciary Federal judge |
description |
This paper is dedicated to investigating the results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for federal judiciary held between 2016 and 2019. In order to reveal whether there were effective results, that is, if the quotas included black people in the position of federal judge. The research dedicated itself to understanding the decisions and strategies adopted in its interpretation and regulation made by the CNJ, as well as in its implementation by the federal regional courts when executing contests. However, in the preliminary phase of the empirical investigation, it was noticed that no black person was approved by the vacancy reservation in the federal regional court that had already applied for the quotas. Thus, the analysis proceeds to characterize and compare the operationalization of the competitions to identify institutional mechanisms, as well as decisions of institutions responding to the implementation and behaviors of the bureaucracy, which may be related to the low effectiveness of the vacancy reserve. Given the ineffectiveness shown by the results, the interpretation addresses the handling of public action instruments, the repertoire and available possibilities put into dialogue with the practices adopted by the courts. The contribution of the work are a diagnosis of the results in the Federal Courts also the presentation of recommendations for the improvement of the implementation (policy brief), elaborated in the light of the current regulations, since, the formulator himself points out antidotes to circumvent a possible low effectiveness. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-07-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/491 10.46901/revistadadpu.i17.p171-186 |
url |
https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/491 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.46901/revistadadpu.i17.p171-186 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/491/326 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da Defensoria Pública da União http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da Defensoria Pública da União http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Nacional da Defensoria Pública da União |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Nacional da Defensoria Pública da União |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; Núm. 17 (2022): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 171-186 Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; n. 17 (2022): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 171-186 Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; No. 17 (2022): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 171-186 2448-4555 1984-0322 10.46901/revistadadpu.i17 reponame:Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) instname:Defensoria Pública da União (DPU) instacron:DPU |
instname_str |
Defensoria Pública da União (DPU) |
instacron_str |
DPU |
institution |
DPU |
reponame_str |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) - Defensoria Pública da União (DPU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicacoes.esdpu@dpu.def.br |
_version_ |
1797054103211212800 |