O controle de escolhas administrativas no Brasil: nova perspectiva para a prossecução do interesse público
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/552 |
Resumo: | This article deals with the expansion of control over Brazilian Public Administration. The highlighted event is a premise to ensure management effectiveness, considering that, in a complex and globalized world, the guarantee of public interest underlying state-owned interests depends on legitimacy, sustainability, humanity and commitment in administrative discretion exercise. During the research, it is denoted doctrinal and institutional effort to introduce these values into Brazilian public agente daily work, emphasizing that administrative choices are now submitted, in Brazil, to four kinds of control, namely: social, technical (“risk management”), judicial and performance (“people management”). The main goal is to structure the understanding each of these control programs, identifying its theoretical assumptions, institutional consequences and practical limitations. Reading the work allows identifying that there are theoretical subsidies – and even consolidated normative reference – in order to supervise and correct arbitrariness in the field of administrative choices. However, due to a timid investment in "positive quality control" (lack of incentive for qualification and engagement) in people management segment, it is argued that is still not possible to talk about a favorable environment for the construction of more responsive administrative decisions in the country. From the methodological angle, there is an applied nature research, descriptive objectives, based on bibliographic and documental survey, quantitative data analysis and deductive approach method. |
id |
DPU_d0f365ce5a0875b9302b3090a3b46d28 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.172.28.97.76:article/552 |
network_acronym_str |
DPU |
network_name_str |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
O controle de escolhas administrativas no Brasil: nova perspectiva para a prossecução do interesse públicoGestão PúblicaDiscricionariedadeControleSociedade GlobalizadaThis article deals with the expansion of control over Brazilian Public Administration. The highlighted event is a premise to ensure management effectiveness, considering that, in a complex and globalized world, the guarantee of public interest underlying state-owned interests depends on legitimacy, sustainability, humanity and commitment in administrative discretion exercise. During the research, it is denoted doctrinal and institutional effort to introduce these values into Brazilian public agente daily work, emphasizing that administrative choices are now submitted, in Brazil, to four kinds of control, namely: social, technical (“risk management”), judicial and performance (“people management”). The main goal is to structure the understanding each of these control programs, identifying its theoretical assumptions, institutional consequences and practical limitations. Reading the work allows identifying that there are theoretical subsidies – and even consolidated normative reference – in order to supervise and correct arbitrariness in the field of administrative choices. However, due to a timid investment in "positive quality control" (lack of incentive for qualification and engagement) in people management segment, it is argued that is still not possible to talk about a favorable environment for the construction of more responsive administrative decisions in the country. From the methodological angle, there is an applied nature research, descriptive objectives, based on bibliographic and documental survey, quantitative data analysis and deductive approach method.O presente artigo versa sobre a ampliação do controle da discricionariedade administrativa na gestão pública brasileira, abordando o tema sob o pressuposto da globalização, do pluralismo e da necessidade de institucionalização de mecanismos para racionalizar o atendimento do interesse público subjacente aos fins estatais. No curso da pesquisa, registra-se o esforço doutrinário e institucional dedicado ao atendimento da referida demanda, a partir de um programa de gestão pública baseado em três pilares fundamentais, a saber: controle social, gestão de riscos e administração com ênfase em resultados práticos (“consequencialismo”). De maneira central, a pesquisa dedica-se ao estabelecimento de uma compreensão sistematizada sobre cada um dos citados pilares, caracterizando suas premissas teóricas elementares, os seus contornos dentro do ordenamento jurídico, assim como o acervo de métodos, ferramentas e perspectivas disponibilizado para efetuar o controle da discricionariedade administrativa. Sob o ângulo metodológico, a pesquisa é de natureza aplicada, assumindo objetivos descritivos, com suporte em levantamento bibliográfico e documental, análise quantitativa de dados e método de abordagem dedutivo. Escola Nacional da Defensoria Pública da União2023-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/55210.46901/revistadadpu.i20.p189-215Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; Vol. 20 Núm. 20 (2023): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 189-215Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; v. 20 n. 20 (2023): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 189-215Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; Vol. 20 No. 20 (2023): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 189-2152448-45551984-032210.46901/revistadadpu.i20reponame:Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online)instname:Defensoria Pública da União (DPU)instacron:DPUporhttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/552/375Copyright (c) 2023 Revista da Defensoria Pública da Uniãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessThompsen Niemczewski, Gabriel2023-12-20T12:01:41Zoai:ojs2.172.28.97.76:article/552Revistahttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/PUBhttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/oaipublicacoes.esdpu@dpu.def.br2448-45551984-0322opendoar:2023-12-20T12:01:41Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) - Defensoria Pública da União (DPU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
O controle de escolhas administrativas no Brasil: nova perspectiva para a prossecução do interesse público |
title |
O controle de escolhas administrativas no Brasil: nova perspectiva para a prossecução do interesse público |
spellingShingle |
O controle de escolhas administrativas no Brasil: nova perspectiva para a prossecução do interesse público Thompsen Niemczewski, Gabriel Gestão Pública Discricionariedade Controle Sociedade Globalizada |
title_short |
O controle de escolhas administrativas no Brasil: nova perspectiva para a prossecução do interesse público |
title_full |
O controle de escolhas administrativas no Brasil: nova perspectiva para a prossecução do interesse público |
title_fullStr |
O controle de escolhas administrativas no Brasil: nova perspectiva para a prossecução do interesse público |
title_full_unstemmed |
O controle de escolhas administrativas no Brasil: nova perspectiva para a prossecução do interesse público |
title_sort |
O controle de escolhas administrativas no Brasil: nova perspectiva para a prossecução do interesse público |
author |
Thompsen Niemczewski, Gabriel |
author_facet |
Thompsen Niemczewski, Gabriel |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Thompsen Niemczewski, Gabriel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Gestão Pública Discricionariedade Controle Sociedade Globalizada |
topic |
Gestão Pública Discricionariedade Controle Sociedade Globalizada |
description |
This article deals with the expansion of control over Brazilian Public Administration. The highlighted event is a premise to ensure management effectiveness, considering that, in a complex and globalized world, the guarantee of public interest underlying state-owned interests depends on legitimacy, sustainability, humanity and commitment in administrative discretion exercise. During the research, it is denoted doctrinal and institutional effort to introduce these values into Brazilian public agente daily work, emphasizing that administrative choices are now submitted, in Brazil, to four kinds of control, namely: social, technical (“risk management”), judicial and performance (“people management”). The main goal is to structure the understanding each of these control programs, identifying its theoretical assumptions, institutional consequences and practical limitations. Reading the work allows identifying that there are theoretical subsidies – and even consolidated normative reference – in order to supervise and correct arbitrariness in the field of administrative choices. However, due to a timid investment in "positive quality control" (lack of incentive for qualification and engagement) in people management segment, it is argued that is still not possible to talk about a favorable environment for the construction of more responsive administrative decisions in the country. From the methodological angle, there is an applied nature research, descriptive objectives, based on bibliographic and documental survey, quantitative data analysis and deductive approach method. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/552 10.46901/revistadadpu.i20.p189-215 |
url |
https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/552 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.46901/revistadadpu.i20.p189-215 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/552/375 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista da Defensoria Pública da União http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista da Defensoria Pública da União http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Nacional da Defensoria Pública da União |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Nacional da Defensoria Pública da União |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; Vol. 20 Núm. 20 (2023): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 189-215 Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; v. 20 n. 20 (2023): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 189-215 Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; Vol. 20 No. 20 (2023): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 189-215 2448-4555 1984-0322 10.46901/revistadadpu.i20 reponame:Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) instname:Defensoria Pública da União (DPU) instacron:DPU |
instname_str |
Defensoria Pública da União (DPU) |
instacron_str |
DPU |
institution |
DPU |
reponame_str |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) - Defensoria Pública da União (DPU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicacoes.esdpu@dpu.def.br |
_version_ |
1797054101908881408 |