The manauara’s “rental aid” (municipal law n. 1.666/2012) and it’s relation with the collective unocupied
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/272 |
Resumo: | The Municipal Law n. 1.666/2012 established the rental aid for those families affected by the following natural events: (i) floods (ii) landslides and (iii) other risk situations - or for public works. Recently, this law has been the subject of an unconstitutionality, in view of its very limited scope of protection, which is supposed to violate the principle of proportionality, in its modality of insufficient protection, since it does not cover persons who, although were in a situation of vulnerability, were subject to reintegration of collective possession. The interpretation given by the Amazon Court of Justice was that its scope of protection does not include people who have been removed from environmental protection areas, as it is not for the Judiciary to expand a role stipulated by the Legislative Branch. The methodology used in the work was the interpretation of the judicial decision rendered in the records of Internal Appeal no. 0000463-27.2018.8.04.0000 judged by the First Civil Chamber of the Court of Justice of Amazonas, taking into consideration the principles of the dignity of the human person , minimum existential, proportionality, legality, the rule of law, etc., all of them listed by the Public Defender's Office and the State Attorney General's Office. After analyzing the favorable and contrary positions, he concluded that the Court of Justice of the State of Amazonas ruled in its decision not to declare unconstitutional Municipal Law n. 1,666 / 2012. |
id |
DPU_e23c99eb30ef59f2e6b1aa1c1253e1a9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.172.28.97.76:article/272 |
network_acronym_str |
DPU |
network_name_str |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The manauara’s “rental aid” (municipal law n. 1.666/2012) and it’s relation with the collective unocupiedO “auxílio aluguel” manauara (lei municipal n. 1.666/2012) e a sua relação com as desocupações coletivasRental Assistance. Municipal Law 1.666/2012. Principle of the Dignity of the Human Person. Court of Justice of the Amazon.Auxílio Aluguel. Lei Municipal 1.666/2012. Princípio da Dignidade da Pessoa Humana. Tribunal de Justiça do Amazonas.The Municipal Law n. 1.666/2012 established the rental aid for those families affected by the following natural events: (i) floods (ii) landslides and (iii) other risk situations - or for public works. Recently, this law has been the subject of an unconstitutionality, in view of its very limited scope of protection, which is supposed to violate the principle of proportionality, in its modality of insufficient protection, since it does not cover persons who, although were in a situation of vulnerability, were subject to reintegration of collective possession. The interpretation given by the Amazon Court of Justice was that its scope of protection does not include people who have been removed from environmental protection areas, as it is not for the Judiciary to expand a role stipulated by the Legislative Branch. The methodology used in the work was the interpretation of the judicial decision rendered in the records of Internal Appeal no. 0000463-27.2018.8.04.0000 judged by the First Civil Chamber of the Court of Justice of Amazonas, taking into consideration the principles of the dignity of the human person , minimum existential, proportionality, legality, the rule of law, etc., all of them listed by the Public Defender's Office and the State Attorney General's Office. After analyzing the favorable and contrary positions, he concluded that the Court of Justice of the State of Amazonas ruled in its decision not to declare unconstitutional Municipal Law n. 1,666 / 2012.A Lei Municipal n. 1.666/2012 instituiu o auxílio aluguel destinado àquelas famílias atingidas pelos seguintes eventos naturais - (i) enchentes (ii) desmoronamentos e (iii) outras situações de risco – ou para realização de obras públicas. Recentemente, essa lei foi alvo de arguição incidental de inconstitucionalidade, tendo em vista o seu âmbito de proteção ser muito restrito, o que supostamente estaria violando o princípio da proporcionalidade, na sua modalidade de proteção insuficiente, já que não abarcavam as pessoas que, embora estivessem em situação de vulnerabilidade, foram objeto de reintegração de posse coletiva. A interpretação conferida pelo Tribunal de Justiça do Amazonas foi a de que o seu âmbito de proteção não engloba as pessoas que foram retirados de áreas de proteção ambiental, pois não compete ao Poder Judiciário ampliar um rol estipulado pelo Poder Legislativo. A metodologia utilizada no trabalho foi a de interpretação da decisão judicial proferida nos autos do Agravo Interno n.º 0000463-27.2018.8.04.0000 julgado pela Primeira Câmara Cível do Tribunal de Justiça do Amazonas, levando em consideração os princípios da dignidade da pessoa humana, do mínimo existencial, da proporcionalidade, da legalidade, do Estado de Direito etc., todos eles elencados pela Defensoria Pública e pela Procuradoria Geral do Estado. Após analisar as posições favoráveis e contrárias, concluiu que o Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Amazonas acertou na sua decisão de não declarar inconstitucional a Lei Municipal n. 1.666/2012.Escola Nacional da Defensoria Pública da União2020-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/27210.46901/revistadadpu.i13.p233-255Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; Núm. 13 (2020): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 233-255Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; n. 13 (2020): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 233-255Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; No. 13 (2020): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 233-2552448-45551984-032210.46901/revistadadpu.i13reponame:Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online)instname:Defensoria Pública da União (DPU)instacron:DPUporhttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/272/214Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Defensoria Pública da Uniãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Joao Paulo Marques dos2020-11-09T13:33:59Zoai:ojs2.172.28.97.76:article/272Revistahttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/PUBhttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/oaipublicacoes.esdpu@dpu.def.br2448-45551984-0322opendoar:2023-01-12T16:09:35.093962Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) - Defensoria Pública da União (DPU)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The manauara’s “rental aid” (municipal law n. 1.666/2012) and it’s relation with the collective unocupied O “auxílio aluguel” manauara (lei municipal n. 1.666/2012) e a sua relação com as desocupações coletivas |
title |
The manauara’s “rental aid” (municipal law n. 1.666/2012) and it’s relation with the collective unocupied |
spellingShingle |
The manauara’s “rental aid” (municipal law n. 1.666/2012) and it’s relation with the collective unocupied Santos, Joao Paulo Marques dos Rental Assistance. Municipal Law 1.666/2012. Principle of the Dignity of the Human Person. Court of Justice of the Amazon. Auxílio Aluguel. Lei Municipal 1.666/2012. Princípio da Dignidade da Pessoa Humana. Tribunal de Justiça do Amazonas. |
title_short |
The manauara’s “rental aid” (municipal law n. 1.666/2012) and it’s relation with the collective unocupied |
title_full |
The manauara’s “rental aid” (municipal law n. 1.666/2012) and it’s relation with the collective unocupied |
title_fullStr |
The manauara’s “rental aid” (municipal law n. 1.666/2012) and it’s relation with the collective unocupied |
title_full_unstemmed |
The manauara’s “rental aid” (municipal law n. 1.666/2012) and it’s relation with the collective unocupied |
title_sort |
The manauara’s “rental aid” (municipal law n. 1.666/2012) and it’s relation with the collective unocupied |
author |
Santos, Joao Paulo Marques dos |
author_facet |
Santos, Joao Paulo Marques dos |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Joao Paulo Marques dos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Rental Assistance. Municipal Law 1.666/2012. Principle of the Dignity of the Human Person. Court of Justice of the Amazon. Auxílio Aluguel. Lei Municipal 1.666/2012. Princípio da Dignidade da Pessoa Humana. Tribunal de Justiça do Amazonas. |
topic |
Rental Assistance. Municipal Law 1.666/2012. Principle of the Dignity of the Human Person. Court of Justice of the Amazon. Auxílio Aluguel. Lei Municipal 1.666/2012. Princípio da Dignidade da Pessoa Humana. Tribunal de Justiça do Amazonas. |
description |
The Municipal Law n. 1.666/2012 established the rental aid for those families affected by the following natural events: (i) floods (ii) landslides and (iii) other risk situations - or for public works. Recently, this law has been the subject of an unconstitutionality, in view of its very limited scope of protection, which is supposed to violate the principle of proportionality, in its modality of insufficient protection, since it does not cover persons who, although were in a situation of vulnerability, were subject to reintegration of collective possession. The interpretation given by the Amazon Court of Justice was that its scope of protection does not include people who have been removed from environmental protection areas, as it is not for the Judiciary to expand a role stipulated by the Legislative Branch. The methodology used in the work was the interpretation of the judicial decision rendered in the records of Internal Appeal no. 0000463-27.2018.8.04.0000 judged by the First Civil Chamber of the Court of Justice of Amazonas, taking into consideration the principles of the dignity of the human person , minimum existential, proportionality, legality, the rule of law, etc., all of them listed by the Public Defender's Office and the State Attorney General's Office. After analyzing the favorable and contrary positions, he concluded that the Court of Justice of the State of Amazonas ruled in its decision not to declare unconstitutional Municipal Law n. 1,666 / 2012. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/272 10.46901/revistadadpu.i13.p233-255 |
url |
https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/272 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.46901/revistadadpu.i13.p233-255 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/272/214 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Defensoria Pública da União info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Defensoria Pública da União |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Nacional da Defensoria Pública da União |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Nacional da Defensoria Pública da União |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; Núm. 13 (2020): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 233-255 Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; n. 13 (2020): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 233-255 Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; No. 13 (2020): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 233-255 2448-4555 1984-0322 10.46901/revistadadpu.i13 reponame:Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) instname:Defensoria Pública da União (DPU) instacron:DPU |
instname_str |
Defensoria Pública da União (DPU) |
instacron_str |
DPU |
institution |
DPU |
reponame_str |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) - Defensoria Pública da União (DPU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicacoes.esdpu@dpu.def.br |
_version_ |
1797054103010934784 |