Protectionism in Retrospect: Mihail Manoilescu (1891-1950?)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: BOBULESCU,ROXANA
Data de Publicação: 2003
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Economia Política
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572003000400622
Resumo: ABSTRACT This paper examines Mihail Manoilescu’s Theory of Protectionism. Its main point was the defense of a permanent or general protection of high productivity sectors, contrasting with List’s temporary protection of infant industries. Manoilescu’s reasoning goes into a contradiction. He argued that the productivity of agriculture and the productivity of industry would equalize in the long-term. In that case, protection would no longer be necessary. So, his argument needs an additional assumption, that is variable costs of production. Manoilescu mentioned the presence of increasing returns in industry and decreasing returns in agriculture in an appendix. This assumption renders his theory very similar with Graham’s argument and contemporary main- stream analysis of trade and protection (P. Krugman, I. Magaziner and R. Reich).
id EDITORA_34-1_13ea9ab8b1fb22ee3057f7a9f46cf070
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0101-31572003000400622
network_acronym_str EDITORA_34-1
network_name_str Revista de Economia Política
repository_id_str
spelling Protectionism in Retrospect: Mihail Manoilescu (1891-1950?)Protectionism, trade, productivity, ManoilescuGrahamABSTRACT This paper examines Mihail Manoilescu’s Theory of Protectionism. Its main point was the defense of a permanent or general protection of high productivity sectors, contrasting with List’s temporary protection of infant industries. Manoilescu’s reasoning goes into a contradiction. He argued that the productivity of agriculture and the productivity of industry would equalize in the long-term. In that case, protection would no longer be necessary. So, his argument needs an additional assumption, that is variable costs of production. Manoilescu mentioned the presence of increasing returns in industry and decreasing returns in agriculture in an appendix. This assumption renders his theory very similar with Graham’s argument and contemporary main- stream analysis of trade and protection (P. Krugman, I. Magaziner and R. Reich).Centro de Economia Política2003-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572003000400622Brazilian Journal of Political Economy v.23 n.4 2003reponame:Revista de Economia Políticainstname:EDITORA 34instacron:EDITORA_3410.1590/0101-31572003-0644info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBOBULESCU,ROXANAeng2020-09-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-31572003000400622Revistahttps://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journalONGhttps://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/oai||cecilia.heise@bjpe.org.br1809-45380101-3157opendoar:2020-09-22T00:00Revista de Economia Política - EDITORA 34false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Protectionism in Retrospect: Mihail Manoilescu (1891-1950?)
title Protectionism in Retrospect: Mihail Manoilescu (1891-1950?)
spellingShingle Protectionism in Retrospect: Mihail Manoilescu (1891-1950?)
BOBULESCU,ROXANA
Protectionism, trade, productivity, Manoilescu
Graham
title_short Protectionism in Retrospect: Mihail Manoilescu (1891-1950?)
title_full Protectionism in Retrospect: Mihail Manoilescu (1891-1950?)
title_fullStr Protectionism in Retrospect: Mihail Manoilescu (1891-1950?)
title_full_unstemmed Protectionism in Retrospect: Mihail Manoilescu (1891-1950?)
title_sort Protectionism in Retrospect: Mihail Manoilescu (1891-1950?)
author BOBULESCU,ROXANA
author_facet BOBULESCU,ROXANA
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv BOBULESCU,ROXANA
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Protectionism, trade, productivity, Manoilescu
Graham
topic Protectionism, trade, productivity, Manoilescu
Graham
description ABSTRACT This paper examines Mihail Manoilescu’s Theory of Protectionism. Its main point was the defense of a permanent or general protection of high productivity sectors, contrasting with List’s temporary protection of infant industries. Manoilescu’s reasoning goes into a contradiction. He argued that the productivity of agriculture and the productivity of industry would equalize in the long-term. In that case, protection would no longer be necessary. So, his argument needs an additional assumption, that is variable costs of production. Manoilescu mentioned the presence of increasing returns in industry and decreasing returns in agriculture in an appendix. This assumption renders his theory very similar with Graham’s argument and contemporary main- stream analysis of trade and protection (P. Krugman, I. Magaziner and R. Reich).
publishDate 2003
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2003-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572003000400622
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572003000400622
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0101-31572003-0644
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Economia Política
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Economia Política
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Political Economy v.23 n.4 2003
reponame:Revista de Economia Política
instname:EDITORA 34
instacron:EDITORA_34
instname_str EDITORA 34
instacron_str EDITORA_34
institution EDITORA_34
reponame_str Revista de Economia Política
collection Revista de Economia Política
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Economia Política - EDITORA 34
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cecilia.heise@bjpe.org.br
_version_ 1754122480019046400