The Multisided Threat to Free Trade: Protectionism and Fair Trade During Increasing Populism

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ehrlich, Sean D.
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Gahagan, Christopher
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i1.6082
Resumo: The standard embedded liberalism argument for increasing free trade after World War II is that countries have compensated those hurt by trade and, therefore, have reduced opposition to free trade policies. This argument relies on opposition to trade being motivated by personal economic effects of trade; however, recent work has increasingly found other motivations for protectionism, calling into question the sustainability of embedded liberalism. This article argues that this threat to embedded liberalism will grow worse as populism increases, which leads to both more nationalistic and more economic opposition to trade, which is only partially offset by other non-economic opposition (most notably, fair trade) decreasing. This article offers a conceptual framework for the different types of opposition to trade and how increasing populism influences its composition. The framework is supported by descriptive statistics of public opinion on trade policy in the US over the past two decades, encompassing trade opinions before and during the global financial crisis, as well as during the rise of global populist movements starting around 2016. We conclude the article with policy implications regarding the multi-sided threat to free trade and how policymakers can confront the evolving challenges to embedded liberalism.
id RCAP_76ed184d9f1aa0e7d5d5e7e6926f9ea8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6082
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The Multisided Threat to Free Trade: Protectionism and Fair Trade During Increasing Populismembedded liberalism; fair trade; free trade; populism; protectionism; trade policy preferencesThe standard embedded liberalism argument for increasing free trade after World War II is that countries have compensated those hurt by trade and, therefore, have reduced opposition to free trade policies. This argument relies on opposition to trade being motivated by personal economic effects of trade; however, recent work has increasingly found other motivations for protectionism, calling into question the sustainability of embedded liberalism. This article argues that this threat to embedded liberalism will grow worse as populism increases, which leads to both more nationalistic and more economic opposition to trade, which is only partially offset by other non-economic opposition (most notably, fair trade) decreasing. This article offers a conceptual framework for the different types of opposition to trade and how increasing populism influences its composition. The framework is supported by descriptive statistics of public opinion on trade policy in the US over the past two decades, encompassing trade opinions before and during the global financial crisis, as well as during the rise of global populist movements starting around 2016. We conclude the article with policy implications regarding the multi-sided threat to free trade and how policymakers can confront the evolving challenges to embedded liberalism.Cogitatio Press2023-03-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i1.6082https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i1.6082Politics and Governance; Vol 11, No 1 (2023): Re-Embedding Trade in the Shadow of Populism; 223-2362183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6082https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6082/6082Copyright (c) 2023 Sean Ehrlich, Christopher Gahaganinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEhrlich, Sean D.Gahagan, Christopher2023-06-29T15:15:15Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6082Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:48:07.653313Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Multisided Threat to Free Trade: Protectionism and Fair Trade During Increasing Populism
title The Multisided Threat to Free Trade: Protectionism and Fair Trade During Increasing Populism
spellingShingle The Multisided Threat to Free Trade: Protectionism and Fair Trade During Increasing Populism
Ehrlich, Sean D.
embedded liberalism; fair trade; free trade; populism; protectionism; trade policy preferences
title_short The Multisided Threat to Free Trade: Protectionism and Fair Trade During Increasing Populism
title_full The Multisided Threat to Free Trade: Protectionism and Fair Trade During Increasing Populism
title_fullStr The Multisided Threat to Free Trade: Protectionism and Fair Trade During Increasing Populism
title_full_unstemmed The Multisided Threat to Free Trade: Protectionism and Fair Trade During Increasing Populism
title_sort The Multisided Threat to Free Trade: Protectionism and Fair Trade During Increasing Populism
author Ehrlich, Sean D.
author_facet Ehrlich, Sean D.
Gahagan, Christopher
author_role author
author2 Gahagan, Christopher
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ehrlich, Sean D.
Gahagan, Christopher
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv embedded liberalism; fair trade; free trade; populism; protectionism; trade policy preferences
topic embedded liberalism; fair trade; free trade; populism; protectionism; trade policy preferences
description The standard embedded liberalism argument for increasing free trade after World War II is that countries have compensated those hurt by trade and, therefore, have reduced opposition to free trade policies. This argument relies on opposition to trade being motivated by personal economic effects of trade; however, recent work has increasingly found other motivations for protectionism, calling into question the sustainability of embedded liberalism. This article argues that this threat to embedded liberalism will grow worse as populism increases, which leads to both more nationalistic and more economic opposition to trade, which is only partially offset by other non-economic opposition (most notably, fair trade) decreasing. This article offers a conceptual framework for the different types of opposition to trade and how increasing populism influences its composition. The framework is supported by descriptive statistics of public opinion on trade policy in the US over the past two decades, encompassing trade opinions before and during the global financial crisis, as well as during the rise of global populist movements starting around 2016. We conclude the article with policy implications regarding the multi-sided threat to free trade and how policymakers can confront the evolving challenges to embedded liberalism.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-29
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i1.6082
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i1.6082
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i1.6082
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6082
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6082/6082
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Sean Ehrlich, Christopher Gahagan
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Sean Ehrlich, Christopher Gahagan
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 11, No 1 (2023): Re-Embedding Trade in the Shadow of Populism; 223-236
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131564156649472