The Multisided Threat to Free Trade: Protectionism and Fair Trade During Increasing Populism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i1.6082 |
Resumo: | The standard embedded liberalism argument for increasing free trade after World War II is that countries have compensated those hurt by trade and, therefore, have reduced opposition to free trade policies. This argument relies on opposition to trade being motivated by personal economic effects of trade; however, recent work has increasingly found other motivations for protectionism, calling into question the sustainability of embedded liberalism. This article argues that this threat to embedded liberalism will grow worse as populism increases, which leads to both more nationalistic and more economic opposition to trade, which is only partially offset by other non-economic opposition (most notably, fair trade) decreasing. This article offers a conceptual framework for the different types of opposition to trade and how increasing populism influences its composition. The framework is supported by descriptive statistics of public opinion on trade policy in the US over the past two decades, encompassing trade opinions before and during the global financial crisis, as well as during the rise of global populist movements starting around 2016. We conclude the article with policy implications regarding the multi-sided threat to free trade and how policymakers can confront the evolving challenges to embedded liberalism. |
id |
RCAP_76ed184d9f1aa0e7d5d5e7e6926f9ea8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6082 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The Multisided Threat to Free Trade: Protectionism and Fair Trade During Increasing Populismembedded liberalism; fair trade; free trade; populism; protectionism; trade policy preferencesThe standard embedded liberalism argument for increasing free trade after World War II is that countries have compensated those hurt by trade and, therefore, have reduced opposition to free trade policies. This argument relies on opposition to trade being motivated by personal economic effects of trade; however, recent work has increasingly found other motivations for protectionism, calling into question the sustainability of embedded liberalism. This article argues that this threat to embedded liberalism will grow worse as populism increases, which leads to both more nationalistic and more economic opposition to trade, which is only partially offset by other non-economic opposition (most notably, fair trade) decreasing. This article offers a conceptual framework for the different types of opposition to trade and how increasing populism influences its composition. The framework is supported by descriptive statistics of public opinion on trade policy in the US over the past two decades, encompassing trade opinions before and during the global financial crisis, as well as during the rise of global populist movements starting around 2016. We conclude the article with policy implications regarding the multi-sided threat to free trade and how policymakers can confront the evolving challenges to embedded liberalism.Cogitatio Press2023-03-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i1.6082https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i1.6082Politics and Governance; Vol 11, No 1 (2023): Re-Embedding Trade in the Shadow of Populism; 223-2362183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6082https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6082/6082Copyright (c) 2023 Sean Ehrlich, Christopher Gahaganinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEhrlich, Sean D.Gahagan, Christopher2023-06-29T15:15:15Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6082Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:48:07.653313Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Multisided Threat to Free Trade: Protectionism and Fair Trade During Increasing Populism |
title |
The Multisided Threat to Free Trade: Protectionism and Fair Trade During Increasing Populism |
spellingShingle |
The Multisided Threat to Free Trade: Protectionism and Fair Trade During Increasing Populism Ehrlich, Sean D. embedded liberalism; fair trade; free trade; populism; protectionism; trade policy preferences |
title_short |
The Multisided Threat to Free Trade: Protectionism and Fair Trade During Increasing Populism |
title_full |
The Multisided Threat to Free Trade: Protectionism and Fair Trade During Increasing Populism |
title_fullStr |
The Multisided Threat to Free Trade: Protectionism and Fair Trade During Increasing Populism |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Multisided Threat to Free Trade: Protectionism and Fair Trade During Increasing Populism |
title_sort |
The Multisided Threat to Free Trade: Protectionism and Fair Trade During Increasing Populism |
author |
Ehrlich, Sean D. |
author_facet |
Ehrlich, Sean D. Gahagan, Christopher |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gahagan, Christopher |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ehrlich, Sean D. Gahagan, Christopher |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
embedded liberalism; fair trade; free trade; populism; protectionism; trade policy preferences |
topic |
embedded liberalism; fair trade; free trade; populism; protectionism; trade policy preferences |
description |
The standard embedded liberalism argument for increasing free trade after World War II is that countries have compensated those hurt by trade and, therefore, have reduced opposition to free trade policies. This argument relies on opposition to trade being motivated by personal economic effects of trade; however, recent work has increasingly found other motivations for protectionism, calling into question the sustainability of embedded liberalism. This article argues that this threat to embedded liberalism will grow worse as populism increases, which leads to both more nationalistic and more economic opposition to trade, which is only partially offset by other non-economic opposition (most notably, fair trade) decreasing. This article offers a conceptual framework for the different types of opposition to trade and how increasing populism influences its composition. The framework is supported by descriptive statistics of public opinion on trade policy in the US over the past two decades, encompassing trade opinions before and during the global financial crisis, as well as during the rise of global populist movements starting around 2016. We conclude the article with policy implications regarding the multi-sided threat to free trade and how policymakers can confront the evolving challenges to embedded liberalism. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-03-29 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i1.6082 https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i1.6082 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i1.6082 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6082 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6082/6082 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Sean Ehrlich, Christopher Gahagan info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Sean Ehrlich, Christopher Gahagan |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Politics and Governance; Vol 11, No 1 (2023): Re-Embedding Trade in the Shadow of Populism; 223-236 2183-2463 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131564156649472 |