States and Economic Development

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kohli,Atul
Data de Publicação: 2009
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Economia Política
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572009000200003
Resumo: Today the Washington Consensus on development lies in tatters. The recent history of the developing world has been unkind to the core claim that a nation that opens its economy and keeps government's role to a minimum invariably experiences rapid economic growth. The evidence against this claim is strong: the developing world as a whole grew faster during the era of state intervention and import substitution (1950-1980) than in the more recent era of structural adjustment (1990-2005); and the recent economic performance of both Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africaregions that truly embraced neoliberalismhas lagged well behind that of many Asian economies, which have instead pursued judicial and unorthodox combinations of state intervention and economic openness. As scholars and policy makers reconstruct alternatives to the Washington Consensus on development, it is important to underline that prudent and effective state intervention and selective integration with the global economy have been responsible for development success in the past; they are also likely to remain the recipes for upward mobility in the global economy in the future."
id EDITORA_34-1_299fba2d6d969c9be51dd795eaaf4745
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0101-31572009000200003
network_acronym_str EDITORA_34-1
network_name_str Revista de Economia Política
repository_id_str
spelling States and Economic Developmentstates and industrializationgrowth in developing countriesSouth KoreaIndiaNigeria and Brazilstate types and state capacityToday the Washington Consensus on development lies in tatters. The recent history of the developing world has been unkind to the core claim that a nation that opens its economy and keeps government's role to a minimum invariably experiences rapid economic growth. The evidence against this claim is strong: the developing world as a whole grew faster during the era of state intervention and import substitution (1950-1980) than in the more recent era of structural adjustment (1990-2005); and the recent economic performance of both Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africaregions that truly embraced neoliberalismhas lagged well behind that of many Asian economies, which have instead pursued judicial and unorthodox combinations of state intervention and economic openness. As scholars and policy makers reconstruct alternatives to the Washington Consensus on development, it is important to underline that prudent and effective state intervention and selective integration with the global economy have been responsible for development success in the past; they are also likely to remain the recipes for upward mobility in the global economy in the future."Centro de Economia Política2009-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572009000200003Brazilian Journal of Political Economy v.29 n.2 2009reponame:Revista de Economia Políticainstname:EDITORA 34instacron:EDITORA_3410.1590/S0101-31572009000200003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKohli,Atuleng2009-04-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-31572009000200003Revistahttps://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journalONGhttps://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/oai||cecilia.heise@bjpe.org.br1809-45380101-3157opendoar:2009-04-24T00:00Revista de Economia Política - EDITORA 34false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv States and Economic Development
title States and Economic Development
spellingShingle States and Economic Development
Kohli,Atul
states and industrialization
growth in developing countries
South Korea
India
Nigeria and Brazil
state types and state capacity
title_short States and Economic Development
title_full States and Economic Development
title_fullStr States and Economic Development
title_full_unstemmed States and Economic Development
title_sort States and Economic Development
author Kohli,Atul
author_facet Kohli,Atul
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kohli,Atul
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv states and industrialization
growth in developing countries
South Korea
India
Nigeria and Brazil
state types and state capacity
topic states and industrialization
growth in developing countries
South Korea
India
Nigeria and Brazil
state types and state capacity
description Today the Washington Consensus on development lies in tatters. The recent history of the developing world has been unkind to the core claim that a nation that opens its economy and keeps government's role to a minimum invariably experiences rapid economic growth. The evidence against this claim is strong: the developing world as a whole grew faster during the era of state intervention and import substitution (1950-1980) than in the more recent era of structural adjustment (1990-2005); and the recent economic performance of both Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africaregions that truly embraced neoliberalismhas lagged well behind that of many Asian economies, which have instead pursued judicial and unorthodox combinations of state intervention and economic openness. As scholars and policy makers reconstruct alternatives to the Washington Consensus on development, it is important to underline that prudent and effective state intervention and selective integration with the global economy have been responsible for development success in the past; they are also likely to remain the recipes for upward mobility in the global economy in the future."
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572009000200003
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572009000200003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0101-31572009000200003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Economia Política
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Economia Política
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Political Economy v.29 n.2 2009
reponame:Revista de Economia Política
instname:EDITORA 34
instacron:EDITORA_34
instname_str EDITORA 34
instacron_str EDITORA_34
institution EDITORA_34
reponame_str Revista de Economia Política
collection Revista de Economia Política
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Economia Política - EDITORA 34
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cecilia.heise@bjpe.org.br
_version_ 1754122480701669376