Rethinking the economics of capital mobility and capital controls

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Palley,Thomas I.
Data de Publicação: 2009
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Economia Política
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572009000300002
Resumo: This paper reexamines the issue of international financial capital mobility, which is today's economic orthodoxy. Discussion is often framed in terms of the impossible trinity. That framing distorts discussion by representing capital mobility as having equal significance with sovereign monetary policy and control over exchange rates. It also distorts discussion by ignoring possibilities for coordinated monetary policy and exchange rates, and for managed capital flows. The case for capital mobility rests on neo-classical economic efficiency arguments and neo-liberal political arguments. The case against capital mobility is based on Keynesian macroeconomic inefficiency arguments, neo-Walrasian market failure arguments, and neo-Marxian arguments regarding distortion of the social structure of accumulation. Close examination shows the case for capital mobility to be extremely flimsy, pointing to the ideological dimension behind today's policy orthodoxy.
id EDITORA_34-1_f095959c0287279e4b320864725b7267
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0101-31572009000300002
network_acronym_str EDITORA_34-1
network_name_str Revista de Economia Política
repository_id_str
spelling Rethinking the economics of capital mobility and capital controlscapital mobilitycapital controlsimpossible trinityThis paper reexamines the issue of international financial capital mobility, which is today's economic orthodoxy. Discussion is often framed in terms of the impossible trinity. That framing distorts discussion by representing capital mobility as having equal significance with sovereign monetary policy and control over exchange rates. It also distorts discussion by ignoring possibilities for coordinated monetary policy and exchange rates, and for managed capital flows. The case for capital mobility rests on neo-classical economic efficiency arguments and neo-liberal political arguments. The case against capital mobility is based on Keynesian macroeconomic inefficiency arguments, neo-Walrasian market failure arguments, and neo-Marxian arguments regarding distortion of the social structure of accumulation. Close examination shows the case for capital mobility to be extremely flimsy, pointing to the ideological dimension behind today's policy orthodoxy.Centro de Economia Política2009-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572009000300002Brazilian Journal of Political Economy v.29 n.3 2009reponame:Revista de Economia Políticainstname:EDITORA 34instacron:EDITORA_3410.1590/S0101-31572009000300002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPalley,Thomas I.eng2009-09-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-31572009000300002Revistahttps://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journalONGhttps://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/oai||cecilia.heise@bjpe.org.br1809-45380101-3157opendoar:2009-09-21T00:00Revista de Economia Política - EDITORA 34false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Rethinking the economics of capital mobility and capital controls
title Rethinking the economics of capital mobility and capital controls
spellingShingle Rethinking the economics of capital mobility and capital controls
Palley,Thomas I.
capital mobility
capital controls
impossible trinity
title_short Rethinking the economics of capital mobility and capital controls
title_full Rethinking the economics of capital mobility and capital controls
title_fullStr Rethinking the economics of capital mobility and capital controls
title_full_unstemmed Rethinking the economics of capital mobility and capital controls
title_sort Rethinking the economics of capital mobility and capital controls
author Palley,Thomas I.
author_facet Palley,Thomas I.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Palley,Thomas I.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv capital mobility
capital controls
impossible trinity
topic capital mobility
capital controls
impossible trinity
description This paper reexamines the issue of international financial capital mobility, which is today's economic orthodoxy. Discussion is often framed in terms of the impossible trinity. That framing distorts discussion by representing capital mobility as having equal significance with sovereign monetary policy and control over exchange rates. It also distorts discussion by ignoring possibilities for coordinated monetary policy and exchange rates, and for managed capital flows. The case for capital mobility rests on neo-classical economic efficiency arguments and neo-liberal political arguments. The case against capital mobility is based on Keynesian macroeconomic inefficiency arguments, neo-Walrasian market failure arguments, and neo-Marxian arguments regarding distortion of the social structure of accumulation. Close examination shows the case for capital mobility to be extremely flimsy, pointing to the ideological dimension behind today's policy orthodoxy.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572009000300002
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572009000300002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0101-31572009000300002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Economia Política
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Economia Política
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Political Economy v.29 n.3 2009
reponame:Revista de Economia Política
instname:EDITORA 34
instacron:EDITORA_34
instname_str EDITORA 34
instacron_str EDITORA_34
institution EDITORA_34
reponame_str Revista de Economia Política
collection Revista de Economia Política
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Economia Política - EDITORA 34
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cecilia.heise@bjpe.org.br
_version_ 1754122480709009408