Rethinking the economics of capital mobility and capital controls
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Economia Política |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572009000300002 |
Resumo: | This paper reexamines the issue of international financial capital mobility, which is today's economic orthodoxy. Discussion is often framed in terms of the impossible trinity. That framing distorts discussion by representing capital mobility as having equal significance with sovereign monetary policy and control over exchange rates. It also distorts discussion by ignoring possibilities for coordinated monetary policy and exchange rates, and for managed capital flows. The case for capital mobility rests on neo-classical economic efficiency arguments and neo-liberal political arguments. The case against capital mobility is based on Keynesian macroeconomic inefficiency arguments, neo-Walrasian market failure arguments, and neo-Marxian arguments regarding distortion of the social structure of accumulation. Close examination shows the case for capital mobility to be extremely flimsy, pointing to the ideological dimension behind today's policy orthodoxy. |
id |
EDITORA_34-1_f095959c0287279e4b320864725b7267 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0101-31572009000300002 |
network_acronym_str |
EDITORA_34-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Economia Política |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Rethinking the economics of capital mobility and capital controlscapital mobilitycapital controlsimpossible trinityThis paper reexamines the issue of international financial capital mobility, which is today's economic orthodoxy. Discussion is often framed in terms of the impossible trinity. That framing distorts discussion by representing capital mobility as having equal significance with sovereign monetary policy and control over exchange rates. It also distorts discussion by ignoring possibilities for coordinated monetary policy and exchange rates, and for managed capital flows. The case for capital mobility rests on neo-classical economic efficiency arguments and neo-liberal political arguments. The case against capital mobility is based on Keynesian macroeconomic inefficiency arguments, neo-Walrasian market failure arguments, and neo-Marxian arguments regarding distortion of the social structure of accumulation. Close examination shows the case for capital mobility to be extremely flimsy, pointing to the ideological dimension behind today's policy orthodoxy.Centro de Economia Política2009-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572009000300002Brazilian Journal of Political Economy v.29 n.3 2009reponame:Revista de Economia Políticainstname:EDITORA 34instacron:EDITORA_3410.1590/S0101-31572009000300002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPalley,Thomas I.eng2009-09-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-31572009000300002Revistahttps://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journalONGhttps://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/oai||cecilia.heise@bjpe.org.br1809-45380101-3157opendoar:2009-09-21T00:00Revista de Economia Política - EDITORA 34false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Rethinking the economics of capital mobility and capital controls |
title |
Rethinking the economics of capital mobility and capital controls |
spellingShingle |
Rethinking the economics of capital mobility and capital controls Palley,Thomas I. capital mobility capital controls impossible trinity |
title_short |
Rethinking the economics of capital mobility and capital controls |
title_full |
Rethinking the economics of capital mobility and capital controls |
title_fullStr |
Rethinking the economics of capital mobility and capital controls |
title_full_unstemmed |
Rethinking the economics of capital mobility and capital controls |
title_sort |
Rethinking the economics of capital mobility and capital controls |
author |
Palley,Thomas I. |
author_facet |
Palley,Thomas I. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Palley,Thomas I. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
capital mobility capital controls impossible trinity |
topic |
capital mobility capital controls impossible trinity |
description |
This paper reexamines the issue of international financial capital mobility, which is today's economic orthodoxy. Discussion is often framed in terms of the impossible trinity. That framing distorts discussion by representing capital mobility as having equal significance with sovereign monetary policy and control over exchange rates. It also distorts discussion by ignoring possibilities for coordinated monetary policy and exchange rates, and for managed capital flows. The case for capital mobility rests on neo-classical economic efficiency arguments and neo-liberal political arguments. The case against capital mobility is based on Keynesian macroeconomic inefficiency arguments, neo-Walrasian market failure arguments, and neo-Marxian arguments regarding distortion of the social structure of accumulation. Close examination shows the case for capital mobility to be extremely flimsy, pointing to the ideological dimension behind today's policy orthodoxy. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572009000300002 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572009000300002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0101-31572009000300002 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Economia Política |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Economia Política |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Political Economy v.29 n.3 2009 reponame:Revista de Economia Política instname:EDITORA 34 instacron:EDITORA_34 |
instname_str |
EDITORA 34 |
instacron_str |
EDITORA_34 |
institution |
EDITORA_34 |
reponame_str |
Revista de Economia Política |
collection |
Revista de Economia Política |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Economia Política - EDITORA 34 |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||cecilia.heise@bjpe.org.br |
_version_ |
1754122480709009408 |