Temporal and spatial effects on maize-bean row intercropping

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Flesch, Roger Delmar
Data de Publicação: 2002
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/6308
Resumo: Maize (Zea mays L.) planting dates and spatial arrangements between maize (cv. Pioneer 6872) and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Rio Tibagi) in a row intercropping system was conducted in Chapecó, SC, Brazil, to determine the best agronomic combinations and the economically most efficient intercropping system. Five experiments were carried out annually and consisted of five maize planting dates in relation to bean, with four spatial arrangements for each planting date. The experimental design was randomized complete blocks with four replications of each treatment. Maize was planted 15 days before bean, simultaneously to bean, and 15, 30 and 45 days after bean planting. The spatial arrangements were 1M:1B (one maize row alternated with one bean row), 2M:2B, 2M:3B and 1M:2B. Planting dates and spatial arrangements influenced the yields of maize and common bean. The most efficient spatial arrangements for maize were 1M:1B and 2M:2B and for common bean were 1M:2B and 2M:3B. Early planting of common bean by 15 days over maize increased its yield by 35% while the maize yield was reduced by 7.5%. Agronomic and economic efficiency of row intercropping over sole cropping increased with common bean early planting.
id EMBRAPA-4_1371f5c9db69784533421dffc8c1748f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/6308
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Temporal and spatial effects on maize-bean row intercroppingEfeitos temporais e espaciais no consórcio intercalar de milho e feijãoZea mays; Phaseolus vulgaris; spatial arrangement; sowing date; yieldsZea mays; Phaseolus vulgaris; arranjo espacial; época de semeadura; rendimentoMaize (Zea mays L.) planting dates and spatial arrangements between maize (cv. Pioneer 6872) and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Rio Tibagi) in a row intercropping system was conducted in Chapecó, SC, Brazil, to determine the best agronomic combinations and the economically most efficient intercropping system. Five experiments were carried out annually and consisted of five maize planting dates in relation to bean, with four spatial arrangements for each planting date. The experimental design was randomized complete blocks with four replications of each treatment. Maize was planted 15 days before bean, simultaneously to bean, and 15, 30 and 45 days after bean planting. The spatial arrangements were 1M:1B (one maize row alternated with one bean row), 2M:2B, 2M:3B and 1M:2B. Planting dates and spatial arrangements influenced the yields of maize and common bean. The most efficient spatial arrangements for maize were 1M:1B and 2M:2B and for common bean were 1M:2B and 2M:3B. Early planting of common bean by 15 days over maize increased its yield by 35% while the maize yield was reduced by 7.5%. Agronomic and economic efficiency of row intercropping over sole cropping increased with common bean early planting.Épocas de semeadura de milho (Zea mays L.) e arranjos espaciais foram estudados em consórcio intercalar entre milho (cv. Pioneer 6872) e feijão (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Rio Tibagi), em Chapecó, SC, com o objetivo de determinar as combinações agronômica e economicamente mais eficientes dos sistemas consorciados. Cinco experimentos foram conduzidos anualmente e consistiram de cinco épocas de semeadura do milho em relação ao feijão, com quatro arranjos espaciais para cada época de semeadura. O delineamento experimental foi o de blocos casualizados, com quatro repetições. O milho foi semeado 15 dias antes do feijão, simultaneamente ao feijão e 15, 30 e 45 dias depois do feijão. Os arranjos espaciais foram 1M:1F (uma fileira de milho alternada com uma fileira de feijão), 2M:2F, 2M:3F e 1M:2F. A época de semeadura e o arranjo espacial influenciaram o rendimento de grãos do milho e do feijão. Os arranjos mais eficientes para o milho foram 1M:1F e 2M:2F e para o feijão foram 1M:2F e 2M:3F. A semeadura antecipada de 15 dias do feijão em relação ao milho aumentou em 35% a produção do feijão enquanto reduziu a do milho em 7,5%. A eficiência agronômica e econômica dos sistemas consorciados aumentaram com a antecipação da semeadura do feijão.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraFlesch, Roger Delmar2002-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/6308Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.37, n.1, jan. 2002; 51-56Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.37, n.1, jan. 2002; 51-561678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/6308/3365info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-07-21T17:41:20Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/6308Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-07-21T17:41:20Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Temporal and spatial effects on maize-bean row intercropping
Efeitos temporais e espaciais no consórcio intercalar de milho e feijão
title Temporal and spatial effects on maize-bean row intercropping
spellingShingle Temporal and spatial effects on maize-bean row intercropping
Flesch, Roger Delmar
Zea mays; Phaseolus vulgaris; spatial arrangement; sowing date; yields
Zea mays; Phaseolus vulgaris; arranjo espacial; época de semeadura; rendimento
title_short Temporal and spatial effects on maize-bean row intercropping
title_full Temporal and spatial effects on maize-bean row intercropping
title_fullStr Temporal and spatial effects on maize-bean row intercropping
title_full_unstemmed Temporal and spatial effects on maize-bean row intercropping
title_sort Temporal and spatial effects on maize-bean row intercropping
author Flesch, Roger Delmar
author_facet Flesch, Roger Delmar
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Flesch, Roger Delmar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Zea mays; Phaseolus vulgaris; spatial arrangement; sowing date; yields
Zea mays; Phaseolus vulgaris; arranjo espacial; época de semeadura; rendimento
topic Zea mays; Phaseolus vulgaris; spatial arrangement; sowing date; yields
Zea mays; Phaseolus vulgaris; arranjo espacial; época de semeadura; rendimento
description Maize (Zea mays L.) planting dates and spatial arrangements between maize (cv. Pioneer 6872) and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Rio Tibagi) in a row intercropping system was conducted in Chapecó, SC, Brazil, to determine the best agronomic combinations and the economically most efficient intercropping system. Five experiments were carried out annually and consisted of five maize planting dates in relation to bean, with four spatial arrangements for each planting date. The experimental design was randomized complete blocks with four replications of each treatment. Maize was planted 15 days before bean, simultaneously to bean, and 15, 30 and 45 days after bean planting. The spatial arrangements were 1M:1B (one maize row alternated with one bean row), 2M:2B, 2M:3B and 1M:2B. Planting dates and spatial arrangements influenced the yields of maize and common bean. The most efficient spatial arrangements for maize were 1M:1B and 2M:2B and for common bean were 1M:2B and 2M:3B. Early planting of common bean by 15 days over maize increased its yield by 35% while the maize yield was reduced by 7.5%. Agronomic and economic efficiency of row intercropping over sole cropping increased with common bean early planting.
publishDate 2002
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2002-01-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/6308
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/6308
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/6308/3365
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.37, n.1, jan. 2002; 51-56
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.37, n.1, jan. 2002; 51-56
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416661405007872