Temporal and spatial effects on maize-bean row intercropping
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2002 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/6308 |
Resumo: | Maize (Zea mays L.) planting dates and spatial arrangements between maize (cv. Pioneer 6872) and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Rio Tibagi) in a row intercropping system was conducted in Chapecó, SC, Brazil, to determine the best agronomic combinations and the economically most efficient intercropping system. Five experiments were carried out annually and consisted of five maize planting dates in relation to bean, with four spatial arrangements for each planting date. The experimental design was randomized complete blocks with four replications of each treatment. Maize was planted 15 days before bean, simultaneously to bean, and 15, 30 and 45 days after bean planting. The spatial arrangements were 1M:1B (one maize row alternated with one bean row), 2M:2B, 2M:3B and 1M:2B. Planting dates and spatial arrangements influenced the yields of maize and common bean. The most efficient spatial arrangements for maize were 1M:1B and 2M:2B and for common bean were 1M:2B and 2M:3B. Early planting of common bean by 15 days over maize increased its yield by 35% while the maize yield was reduced by 7.5%. Agronomic and economic efficiency of row intercropping over sole cropping increased with common bean early planting. |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_1371f5c9db69784533421dffc8c1748f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/6308 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Temporal and spatial effects on maize-bean row intercroppingEfeitos temporais e espaciais no consórcio intercalar de milho e feijãoZea mays; Phaseolus vulgaris; spatial arrangement; sowing date; yieldsZea mays; Phaseolus vulgaris; arranjo espacial; época de semeadura; rendimentoMaize (Zea mays L.) planting dates and spatial arrangements between maize (cv. Pioneer 6872) and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Rio Tibagi) in a row intercropping system was conducted in Chapecó, SC, Brazil, to determine the best agronomic combinations and the economically most efficient intercropping system. Five experiments were carried out annually and consisted of five maize planting dates in relation to bean, with four spatial arrangements for each planting date. The experimental design was randomized complete blocks with four replications of each treatment. Maize was planted 15 days before bean, simultaneously to bean, and 15, 30 and 45 days after bean planting. The spatial arrangements were 1M:1B (one maize row alternated with one bean row), 2M:2B, 2M:3B and 1M:2B. Planting dates and spatial arrangements influenced the yields of maize and common bean. The most efficient spatial arrangements for maize were 1M:1B and 2M:2B and for common bean were 1M:2B and 2M:3B. Early planting of common bean by 15 days over maize increased its yield by 35% while the maize yield was reduced by 7.5%. Agronomic and economic efficiency of row intercropping over sole cropping increased with common bean early planting.Épocas de semeadura de milho (Zea mays L.) e arranjos espaciais foram estudados em consórcio intercalar entre milho (cv. Pioneer 6872) e feijão (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Rio Tibagi), em Chapecó, SC, com o objetivo de determinar as combinações agronômica e economicamente mais eficientes dos sistemas consorciados. Cinco experimentos foram conduzidos anualmente e consistiram de cinco épocas de semeadura do milho em relação ao feijão, com quatro arranjos espaciais para cada época de semeadura. O delineamento experimental foi o de blocos casualizados, com quatro repetições. O milho foi semeado 15 dias antes do feijão, simultaneamente ao feijão e 15, 30 e 45 dias depois do feijão. Os arranjos espaciais foram 1M:1F (uma fileira de milho alternada com uma fileira de feijão), 2M:2F, 2M:3F e 1M:2F. A época de semeadura e o arranjo espacial influenciaram o rendimento de grãos do milho e do feijão. Os arranjos mais eficientes para o milho foram 1M:1F e 2M:2F e para o feijão foram 1M:2F e 2M:3F. A semeadura antecipada de 15 dias do feijão em relação ao milho aumentou em 35% a produção do feijão enquanto reduziu a do milho em 7,5%. A eficiência agronômica e econômica dos sistemas consorciados aumentaram com a antecipação da semeadura do feijão.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraFlesch, Roger Delmar2002-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/6308Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.37, n.1, jan. 2002; 51-56Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.37, n.1, jan. 2002; 51-561678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/6308/3365info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-07-21T17:41:20Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/6308Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-07-21T17:41:20Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Temporal and spatial effects on maize-bean row intercropping Efeitos temporais e espaciais no consórcio intercalar de milho e feijão |
title |
Temporal and spatial effects on maize-bean row intercropping |
spellingShingle |
Temporal and spatial effects on maize-bean row intercropping Flesch, Roger Delmar Zea mays; Phaseolus vulgaris; spatial arrangement; sowing date; yields Zea mays; Phaseolus vulgaris; arranjo espacial; época de semeadura; rendimento |
title_short |
Temporal and spatial effects on maize-bean row intercropping |
title_full |
Temporal and spatial effects on maize-bean row intercropping |
title_fullStr |
Temporal and spatial effects on maize-bean row intercropping |
title_full_unstemmed |
Temporal and spatial effects on maize-bean row intercropping |
title_sort |
Temporal and spatial effects on maize-bean row intercropping |
author |
Flesch, Roger Delmar |
author_facet |
Flesch, Roger Delmar |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Flesch, Roger Delmar |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Zea mays; Phaseolus vulgaris; spatial arrangement; sowing date; yields Zea mays; Phaseolus vulgaris; arranjo espacial; época de semeadura; rendimento |
topic |
Zea mays; Phaseolus vulgaris; spatial arrangement; sowing date; yields Zea mays; Phaseolus vulgaris; arranjo espacial; época de semeadura; rendimento |
description |
Maize (Zea mays L.) planting dates and spatial arrangements between maize (cv. Pioneer 6872) and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Rio Tibagi) in a row intercropping system was conducted in Chapecó, SC, Brazil, to determine the best agronomic combinations and the economically most efficient intercropping system. Five experiments were carried out annually and consisted of five maize planting dates in relation to bean, with four spatial arrangements for each planting date. The experimental design was randomized complete blocks with four replications of each treatment. Maize was planted 15 days before bean, simultaneously to bean, and 15, 30 and 45 days after bean planting. The spatial arrangements were 1M:1B (one maize row alternated with one bean row), 2M:2B, 2M:3B and 1M:2B. Planting dates and spatial arrangements influenced the yields of maize and common bean. The most efficient spatial arrangements for maize were 1M:1B and 2M:2B and for common bean were 1M:2B and 2M:3B. Early planting of common bean by 15 days over maize increased its yield by 35% while the maize yield was reduced by 7.5%. Agronomic and economic efficiency of row intercropping over sole cropping increased with common bean early planting. |
publishDate |
2002 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2002-01-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/6308 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/6308 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/6308/3365 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.37, n.1, jan. 2002; 51-56 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.37, n.1, jan. 2002; 51-56 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416661405007872 |