Stability parameters proposed by Lin and Binns (1988) compared with regression method

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Correia Farias, Francisco José
Data de Publicação: 1997
Outros Autores: Patto Ramalho, Magno Antônio, de Carvalho, Luiz Paulo, Nunes Moreira, José de Alencar, Nunes da Costa, Joaquim
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/4657
Resumo: The stability parameters proposed by Lin & Binns (1988) method for yield of seed cotton were compared with the regression method proposed by Eberhart & Russell (1966). The experiments were composed by nine cultivars tested at randomized complete block design with six replicates carried out by CNPA in sixteen sites on Northeast Brazil in 1991 and 1992. The estimate comparison between the two methods was performed by Spearman rank correlation. The cultivars CNPA 6H and CNPA 85-241 showed high yields, β1 ≥ I, R2 > 95%, low values of Pi and contributed only with 2.1 and 3.5% of total interaction while the CNPA Giorge I was the more instable. The Spearman rank correlation between β1 and Pi in 1992 was -0.96 significative by t test (P ≤ 0,01) indicating that these parameters provided the same results. The advantage of Pi utilization is that there is no restriction on the independence of variables and also it indicates the materials with performance near the maximum value in different environments tested.
id EMBRAPA-4_27e8adb1e32ddf122d6639a788febb9c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/4657
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Stability parameters proposed by Lin and Binns (1988) compared with regression methodParâmetros de estabilidade propostos por Lin e Binns (1988) comparados com o método da regressãocotton adaptability; Gossypium hirsutumadaptabilidade do algodão; Gossypium hirsutumThe stability parameters proposed by Lin & Binns (1988) method for yield of seed cotton were compared with the regression method proposed by Eberhart & Russell (1966). The experiments were composed by nine cultivars tested at randomized complete block design with six replicates carried out by CNPA in sixteen sites on Northeast Brazil in 1991 and 1992. The estimate comparison between the two methods was performed by Spearman rank correlation. The cultivars CNPA 6H and CNPA 85-241 showed high yields, β1 ≥ I, R2 > 95%, low values of Pi and contributed only with 2.1 and 3.5% of total interaction while the CNPA Giorge I was the more instable. The Spearman rank correlation between β1 and Pi in 1992 was -0.96 significative by t test (P ≤ 0,01) indicating that these parameters provided the same results. The advantage of Pi utilization is that there is no restriction on the independence of variables and also it indicates the materials with performance near the maximum value in different environments tested.Os parâmetros de estabilidade propostos por Lin & Binns (1988) para rendimento de algodão em caroço foram comparados com o método de Eberhart & Russell (1966) que utiliza a regressão. Os ensaios foram compostos por nove cultivares em delineamento de blocos ao acaso, com seis repetições, conduzidos pelo Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Algodão (CNPA) em 16 localidades da Região Nordeste, no período de 1991 a 1992. As comparações das estimativas entre os dois métodos foram efetuadas através da correlação classificatória de Spearman. As cultivares CNPA 6H e CNPA 85-241 obtiveram altas produtividades, valores de β1 ≥ I, R2 > 95%, baixos valores de Pi e contribuíram somente com 2,1 e 3,5% do total da interação, enquanto a CNPA Giorge I foi a mais instável. A correlação classificatória de Spearman entre β1 e Pi em 1992 foi de -0,96 significativo pelo teste t (P ≤ 0,01), indicando que esses parâmetros forneceram os mesmos resultados. É vantajosa a utilização do Pi, porque não há restrição sobre a independência das variáveis, além de indicar os materiais com desempenhos próximos do valor máximo nos diferentes ambientes testados.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraCorreia Farias, Francisco JoséPatto Ramalho, Magno Antôniode Carvalho, Luiz PauloNunes Moreira, José de AlencarNunes da Costa, Joaquim1997-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/4657Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.32, n.4, abr. 1997; 407-414Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.32, n.4, abr. 1997; 407-4141678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/4657/7241info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-03-11T20:01:46Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/4657Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2015-03-11T20:01:46Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Stability parameters proposed by Lin and Binns (1988) compared with regression method
Parâmetros de estabilidade propostos por Lin e Binns (1988) comparados com o método da regressão
title Stability parameters proposed by Lin and Binns (1988) compared with regression method
spellingShingle Stability parameters proposed by Lin and Binns (1988) compared with regression method
Correia Farias, Francisco José
cotton adaptability; Gossypium hirsutum
adaptabilidade do algodão; Gossypium hirsutum
title_short Stability parameters proposed by Lin and Binns (1988) compared with regression method
title_full Stability parameters proposed by Lin and Binns (1988) compared with regression method
title_fullStr Stability parameters proposed by Lin and Binns (1988) compared with regression method
title_full_unstemmed Stability parameters proposed by Lin and Binns (1988) compared with regression method
title_sort Stability parameters proposed by Lin and Binns (1988) compared with regression method
author Correia Farias, Francisco José
author_facet Correia Farias, Francisco José
Patto Ramalho, Magno Antônio
de Carvalho, Luiz Paulo
Nunes Moreira, José de Alencar
Nunes da Costa, Joaquim
author_role author
author2 Patto Ramalho, Magno Antônio
de Carvalho, Luiz Paulo
Nunes Moreira, José de Alencar
Nunes da Costa, Joaquim
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Correia Farias, Francisco José
Patto Ramalho, Magno Antônio
de Carvalho, Luiz Paulo
Nunes Moreira, José de Alencar
Nunes da Costa, Joaquim
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv cotton adaptability; Gossypium hirsutum
adaptabilidade do algodão; Gossypium hirsutum
topic cotton adaptability; Gossypium hirsutum
adaptabilidade do algodão; Gossypium hirsutum
description The stability parameters proposed by Lin & Binns (1988) method for yield of seed cotton were compared with the regression method proposed by Eberhart & Russell (1966). The experiments were composed by nine cultivars tested at randomized complete block design with six replicates carried out by CNPA in sixteen sites on Northeast Brazil in 1991 and 1992. The estimate comparison between the two methods was performed by Spearman rank correlation. The cultivars CNPA 6H and CNPA 85-241 showed high yields, β1 ≥ I, R2 > 95%, low values of Pi and contributed only with 2.1 and 3.5% of total interaction while the CNPA Giorge I was the more instable. The Spearman rank correlation between β1 and Pi in 1992 was -0.96 significative by t test (P ≤ 0,01) indicating that these parameters provided the same results. The advantage of Pi utilization is that there is no restriction on the independence of variables and also it indicates the materials with performance near the maximum value in different environments tested.
publishDate 1997
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1997-04-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/4657
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/4657
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/4657/7241
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.32, n.4, abr. 1997; 407-414
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.32, n.4, abr. 1997; 407-414
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416690947588096