Environmental factors affecting spittlebug egg survival during the dry season in Central Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15097 |
Resumo: | Spittlebug egg survival and hatching was compared in pastures where differences occurred in vegetative characteristics and grazing intensity. Egg samples were placed in pastures at the start of the dry season and recovered before hatching began. Significantly (P<0.05) more eggs were recovered from areas where litter was present than from bare soil areas. Mortality from predators and scavengers was estimated at 73%. An additional 34% of the eggs were desiccated and 35% were nonviable. Egg survival was estimated to be 8.5% and was greater in pastures with the following characteristics: 1) canopy height > 30 cm; 2) abundant litter; 3) plant cover > 50%; 4) minimal or no grazing. More predators, especially spiders (Araneida) were also collected from these types of pastures. At one site more eggs hatched in a high grass pasture (74%) than in a low grass pasture (59%). Although high grass may receive less damage from spittlebug feeding the disadvantages of maintaining grass > 30 cm appear to outweigh the advantages. |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_3199a46a08ff09a05d15e8749f5c15eb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/15097 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Environmental factors affecting spittlebug egg survival during the dry season in Central BrazilFatores ambientais que afetam a sobrevivência de ovos das cigarrinhas-das-pastagens durante a estação seca, no Brasil Centralspider; Araneida; Zulia entreriana; Deois flavopicta; Brachiaria decumhensaranha; Araneida; Zulia entreriana; Deois; flavopicta; Brachiaria decumbensSpittlebug egg survival and hatching was compared in pastures where differences occurred in vegetative characteristics and grazing intensity. Egg samples were placed in pastures at the start of the dry season and recovered before hatching began. Significantly (P<0.05) more eggs were recovered from areas where litter was present than from bare soil areas. Mortality from predators and scavengers was estimated at 73%. An additional 34% of the eggs were desiccated and 35% were nonviable. Egg survival was estimated to be 8.5% and was greater in pastures with the following characteristics: 1) canopy height > 30 cm; 2) abundant litter; 3) plant cover > 50%; 4) minimal or no grazing. More predators, especially spiders (Araneida) were also collected from these types of pastures. At one site more eggs hatched in a high grass pasture (74%) than in a low grass pasture (59%). Although high grass may receive less damage from spittlebug feeding the disadvantages of maintaining grass > 30 cm appear to outweigh the advantages.Foram comparadas a sobrevivência de ovos das cigarrinhas-das-pastagens e a eclosão de ninfas em pastagens com diferentes características vegetativas e intensidades de pastejo. Amostras de ovos foram colocadas no interior de pastagens, no início da estação seca, e recuperadas antes de se iniciarem as eclosões. O número de ovos recuperados nas áreas que apresentavam palha em decomposição foi significativamente maior (P<0,05) do que nas áreas descobertas. O índice de mortalidade por predadores foi estimado em 73%. Dos ovos recuperados, 34% estiveram ressecados e 35% inviáveis. A sobrevivência de ovos foi estimada como sendo de 8,5% e foi maior nas pastagens com as seguintes características: 1) altura do capim > 30 cm; 2) abundância de palha em decomposição; 3) área coberta pela forrageira > 50%; e 4) pastejo mínimo ou ausente. Mais predadores, particularmente aranhas (Araneida), também foram coletados neste tipo de pastagem. Em um dos locais houve maior percentual de eclosões (74%) nos ovos mantidos no pasto alto, em comparação ao pasto baixo (59%). Embora o pasto alto seja menos danificado por cigarrinhas, as desvantagens de mantê-lo com altura superior a 30 cm parecem sobrepujar as eventuais vantagens.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraHewitt, George Berlyn2014-04-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15097Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.21, n.12, dez. 1986; 1237-1243Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.21, n.12, dez. 1986; 1237-12431678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAenghttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15097/8858info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-11-03T17:25:21Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/15097Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-11-03T17:25:21Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Environmental factors affecting spittlebug egg survival during the dry season in Central Brazil Fatores ambientais que afetam a sobrevivência de ovos das cigarrinhas-das-pastagens durante a estação seca, no Brasil Central |
title |
Environmental factors affecting spittlebug egg survival during the dry season in Central Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Environmental factors affecting spittlebug egg survival during the dry season in Central Brazil Hewitt, George Berlyn spider; Araneida; Zulia entreriana; Deois flavopicta; Brachiaria decumhens aranha; Araneida; Zulia entreriana; Deois; flavopicta; Brachiaria decumbens |
title_short |
Environmental factors affecting spittlebug egg survival during the dry season in Central Brazil |
title_full |
Environmental factors affecting spittlebug egg survival during the dry season in Central Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Environmental factors affecting spittlebug egg survival during the dry season in Central Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Environmental factors affecting spittlebug egg survival during the dry season in Central Brazil |
title_sort |
Environmental factors affecting spittlebug egg survival during the dry season in Central Brazil |
author |
Hewitt, George Berlyn |
author_facet |
Hewitt, George Berlyn |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hewitt, George Berlyn |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
spider; Araneida; Zulia entreriana; Deois flavopicta; Brachiaria decumhens aranha; Araneida; Zulia entreriana; Deois; flavopicta; Brachiaria decumbens |
topic |
spider; Araneida; Zulia entreriana; Deois flavopicta; Brachiaria decumhens aranha; Araneida; Zulia entreriana; Deois; flavopicta; Brachiaria decumbens |
description |
Spittlebug egg survival and hatching was compared in pastures where differences occurred in vegetative characteristics and grazing intensity. Egg samples were placed in pastures at the start of the dry season and recovered before hatching began. Significantly (P<0.05) more eggs were recovered from areas where litter was present than from bare soil areas. Mortality from predators and scavengers was estimated at 73%. An additional 34% of the eggs were desiccated and 35% were nonviable. Egg survival was estimated to be 8.5% and was greater in pastures with the following characteristics: 1) canopy height > 30 cm; 2) abundant litter; 3) plant cover > 50%; 4) minimal or no grazing. More predators, especially spiders (Araneida) were also collected from these types of pastures. At one site more eggs hatched in a high grass pasture (74%) than in a low grass pasture (59%). Although high grass may receive less damage from spittlebug feeding the disadvantages of maintaining grass > 30 cm appear to outweigh the advantages. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-04-17 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15097 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15097 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15097/8858 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.21, n.12, dez. 1986; 1237-1243 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.21, n.12, dez. 1986; 1237-1243 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416678502039552 |