Use of anabolic substances in culled cows
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/14658 |
Resumo: | The experiment was conducted at Unidade de Execução de Pesquisa de Âmbito Estadual de Bagé (UEPAE de Bagé/EMBRAPA), at Bagé RS, Brazil. The experimental animals were 35 Ibagé (3/8 Nelore – 5/8 A. Angus) culled cows from the Station herd. They were randomly assigned and submitted for 209 days to the folowing treatments in a completely randomized statistical design: Treatment I - Control; Treatment II - lmplant of 36 mg of Zeranol sixty-days intervals. Total of three implants; Treatment III - Implant of 36 mg of Zeranol at ninety-days intervals. Total of two implants. During the experimental period the animals grazed on a natural grassland area at the stocking rate of one head per ha. The treatment effects were determined on the basis of weight gain and carcass yield, and income by net return (gross income minus cost). The utilization of Zeranol did not improve the weight gain over the whole experimental period (209 days) but the gains obtained in the 30, 60 and 90 days which immediately followed the first implant were superior to the control (P < 0.01). The net return for Zeranol treatments was inferior to the control due to a lesser amount paid for the kilogram of carcass and higher variable costs. |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_32ea72e3f81af477c5db7863848b9791 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/14658 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Use of anabolic substances in culled cowsUso de anabolizante em vacas de descarteimplants; Zeranol; natural grassland; bovines; native pasture; beef cattleimplantes; substâncias anabólicas; Zeranol; campo natural; bovinos; pasto nativo; gado de corteThe experiment was conducted at Unidade de Execução de Pesquisa de Âmbito Estadual de Bagé (UEPAE de Bagé/EMBRAPA), at Bagé RS, Brazil. The experimental animals were 35 Ibagé (3/8 Nelore – 5/8 A. Angus) culled cows from the Station herd. They were randomly assigned and submitted for 209 days to the folowing treatments in a completely randomized statistical design: Treatment I - Control; Treatment II - lmplant of 36 mg of Zeranol sixty-days intervals. Total of three implants; Treatment III - Implant of 36 mg of Zeranol at ninety-days intervals. Total of two implants. During the experimental period the animals grazed on a natural grassland area at the stocking rate of one head per ha. The treatment effects were determined on the basis of weight gain and carcass yield, and income by net return (gross income minus cost). The utilization of Zeranol did not improve the weight gain over the whole experimental period (209 days) but the gains obtained in the 30, 60 and 90 days which immediately followed the first implant were superior to the control (P < 0.01). The net return for Zeranol treatments was inferior to the control due to a lesser amount paid for the kilogram of carcass and higher variable costs.O presente trabalho foi conduzido na Unidade de Execução de Pesquisa de Âmbito Estadual de Bagé/EMBRAPA, em Bagé, RS. Utilizaram-se 35 vacas lbagé (3/8 Nelore – 5/8 A. Angus) descartadas do rebanho geral da Unidade, as quais foram por 209 dias submetidas aos seguintes tratamentos, de acordo com o delineamento estatístico inteiramente ao acaso: Tratamento I - Testemunha; Tratamento II - Implante de 36 mg de anabolizante Zeranol por animal, a intervalos de 60 dias. Total de três implantes; Tratamento III - Implante de 36 mg de anabolizante Zeranol por animal, a intervalos de 90 dias. Total de dois implantes. Durante a realização do trabalho, os animais experimentais pastejaram uma área de campo natural na lotação de uma cabeça/ha. Os efeitos dos tratamentos foram estudados em termos de ganho de peso, rendimentos de carcaça e econômicos. O uso de anabolizante não afetou o ganho em peso dos animais experimentais durante o período de 209 dias em que foi realizado o trabalho, porém os ganhos observados aos 30, 60 e 90 dias imediatamente após a primeira aplicação do anabolizante foram significativamente superiores (P < 0,01) aos do grupo-testemunha. Os tratamentos que receberam anabolizantes apresentaram um desempenho econômico inferior ao tratamento-testemunha, por causa de um menor valor pago pelo quilograma de carcaça e também por causa de maiores custos variáveis.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraSalomoni, EduardoBorba, Eber Rosa2014-04-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/14658Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.21, n.1, jan. 1986; 53-59Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.21, n.1, jan. 1986; 53-591678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/14658/8341info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-10-16T19:51:01Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/14658Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-10-16T19:51:01Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Use of anabolic substances in culled cows Uso de anabolizante em vacas de descarte |
title |
Use of anabolic substances in culled cows |
spellingShingle |
Use of anabolic substances in culled cows Salomoni, Eduardo implants; Zeranol; natural grassland; bovines; native pasture; beef cattle implantes; substâncias anabólicas; Zeranol; campo natural; bovinos; pasto nativo; gado de corte |
title_short |
Use of anabolic substances in culled cows |
title_full |
Use of anabolic substances in culled cows |
title_fullStr |
Use of anabolic substances in culled cows |
title_full_unstemmed |
Use of anabolic substances in culled cows |
title_sort |
Use of anabolic substances in culled cows |
author |
Salomoni, Eduardo |
author_facet |
Salomoni, Eduardo Borba, Eber Rosa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Borba, Eber Rosa |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Salomoni, Eduardo Borba, Eber Rosa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
implants; Zeranol; natural grassland; bovines; native pasture; beef cattle implantes; substâncias anabólicas; Zeranol; campo natural; bovinos; pasto nativo; gado de corte |
topic |
implants; Zeranol; natural grassland; bovines; native pasture; beef cattle implantes; substâncias anabólicas; Zeranol; campo natural; bovinos; pasto nativo; gado de corte |
description |
The experiment was conducted at Unidade de Execução de Pesquisa de Âmbito Estadual de Bagé (UEPAE de Bagé/EMBRAPA), at Bagé RS, Brazil. The experimental animals were 35 Ibagé (3/8 Nelore – 5/8 A. Angus) culled cows from the Station herd. They were randomly assigned and submitted for 209 days to the folowing treatments in a completely randomized statistical design: Treatment I - Control; Treatment II - lmplant of 36 mg of Zeranol sixty-days intervals. Total of three implants; Treatment III - Implant of 36 mg of Zeranol at ninety-days intervals. Total of two implants. During the experimental period the animals grazed on a natural grassland area at the stocking rate of one head per ha. The treatment effects were determined on the basis of weight gain and carcass yield, and income by net return (gross income minus cost). The utilization of Zeranol did not improve the weight gain over the whole experimental period (209 days) but the gains obtained in the 30, 60 and 90 days which immediately followed the first implant were superior to the control (P < 0.01). The net return for Zeranol treatments was inferior to the control due to a lesser amount paid for the kilogram of carcass and higher variable costs. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-04-17 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/14658 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/14658 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/14658/8341 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.21, n.1, jan. 1986; 53-59 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.21, n.1, jan. 1986; 53-59 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416664240357376 |