Response of Leucaena to inoculation compared under different fertilizer treatments
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/17574 |
Resumo: | The tree legume Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Witt., has a great potential for utilization in tropical agriculture, particularly in animal nutrition as an alternative protein source during dry periods, and in enriching the soil, both uses relying on its capacity for nitrogen fixation. With the aim of evaluating symbiotic nitrogen fixation in Leucaena an experiment was performed at the Instituto de Zootecnia, Nova Odessa, São Paulo, in cooperation with and following the experimental guidelines of the Niftal Project. The field trial was designed to test the effect of fertilization (lime + single super phosphate + KCl) and sources of nitrogen (inoculation, urea and control) in a 2 x 3 factorial design. The total nitrogen and dry matter production in kg.ha-1 –year-1 at the first cut were respectively: 106 ± 14 and 2416 ± 335, for fertilization + inoculation; 80 ± 14 and 1906 ± 316, for fertilization + urea; 70 ± 8 and 1798 ± 249, for fertilization; 67 ± 10 and 1902 ± 359, for inoculation; 29 ± 8 and 754 ± 193, for urea; and 50 ± 10 and 1039 ± 247 for the control. The statistical analysis showed significant responses to fertilization and/or inoculation, this latter being the best source of nitrogen in the experiment. The treatment with urea alone was the worst of all, suggesting the occurrence of acidification, which not only adversely affected the micro but also the macrosymbiont. |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_663b6785a5ef142c123ebe4627552920 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/17574 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Response of Leucaena to inoculation compared under different fertilizer treatmentsResposta de Leucaena à inoculação comparada a diferentes tratamentos fertilizantesN2 fixation; nodulation; Rhizobiumfixação de N2; nodulação; RhizobiumThe tree legume Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Witt., has a great potential for utilization in tropical agriculture, particularly in animal nutrition as an alternative protein source during dry periods, and in enriching the soil, both uses relying on its capacity for nitrogen fixation. With the aim of evaluating symbiotic nitrogen fixation in Leucaena an experiment was performed at the Instituto de Zootecnia, Nova Odessa, São Paulo, in cooperation with and following the experimental guidelines of the Niftal Project. The field trial was designed to test the effect of fertilization (lime + single super phosphate + KCl) and sources of nitrogen (inoculation, urea and control) in a 2 x 3 factorial design. The total nitrogen and dry matter production in kg.ha-1 –year-1 at the first cut were respectively: 106 ± 14 and 2416 ± 335, for fertilization + inoculation; 80 ± 14 and 1906 ± 316, for fertilization + urea; 70 ± 8 and 1798 ± 249, for fertilization; 67 ± 10 and 1902 ± 359, for inoculation; 29 ± 8 and 754 ± 193, for urea; and 50 ± 10 and 1039 ± 247 for the control. The statistical analysis showed significant responses to fertilization and/or inoculation, this latter being the best source of nitrogen in the experiment. The treatment with urea alone was the worst of all, suggesting the occurrence of acidification, which not only adversely affected the micro but also the macrosymbiont.A Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wittt, uma leguminosa arbórea, apresenta grande potencial de utilização em agricultura tropical, principalmente, quer pelo seu emprego em nutrição animal como alternativa proteica para os períodos secos, quer pelo emprego no enriquecimento do solo, inferindo-se à sua capacidade de fixação biológica de nitrogênio. Assim, visando-se avaliar a fixação simbiótica de N2 em leucena, está sendo conduzido no Instituto de Zootecnia - Nova Odessa (SP), em convênio, e segundo padrões experimentais do "Niftal Project", um ensaio de campo comparando o efeito de adubação (calagem + superfosfato simples + KCl) e fontes de fornecimento de nitrogênio (inoculação, uréia e testemunha), num arranjo fatorial 2 x 3. As produções de N total e matéria seca em kg/há-1/ano-1 para os tratamentos no primeiro corte foram, respectivamente: 106 ± 14 e 2416 ± 335, para adubação + inoculação; 80± 14 e 1906 ± 316, para adubação + uréia; 70 ± 8 e 1798 ± 249, para adubação; 67± 10 e 1902 ± 359, para inoculação; 29 ± 8 e 754 ± 193, para uréia e 50 ± 10 e 1039 ± 247, para a testemunha. As análises estatísticas revelaram respostas significativas para os tratamentos contendo adubação e/ou inoculação, sendo esta última, significativamente, a melhor fonte de nitrogénio no experimento.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraValarini, Maria JoséBufarah, Gilberto2014-04-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/17574Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.19, s/n, jun. 1984; 275-279Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.19, s/n, jun. 1984; 275-2791678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/17574/11799info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-04-16T19:15:45Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/17574Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-04-16T19:15:45Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Response of Leucaena to inoculation compared under different fertilizer treatments Resposta de Leucaena à inoculação comparada a diferentes tratamentos fertilizantes |
title |
Response of Leucaena to inoculation compared under different fertilizer treatments |
spellingShingle |
Response of Leucaena to inoculation compared under different fertilizer treatments Valarini, Maria José N2 fixation; nodulation; Rhizobium fixação de N2; nodulação; Rhizobium |
title_short |
Response of Leucaena to inoculation compared under different fertilizer treatments |
title_full |
Response of Leucaena to inoculation compared under different fertilizer treatments |
title_fullStr |
Response of Leucaena to inoculation compared under different fertilizer treatments |
title_full_unstemmed |
Response of Leucaena to inoculation compared under different fertilizer treatments |
title_sort |
Response of Leucaena to inoculation compared under different fertilizer treatments |
author |
Valarini, Maria José |
author_facet |
Valarini, Maria José Bufarah, Gilberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bufarah, Gilberto |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Valarini, Maria José Bufarah, Gilberto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
N2 fixation; nodulation; Rhizobium fixação de N2; nodulação; Rhizobium |
topic |
N2 fixation; nodulation; Rhizobium fixação de N2; nodulação; Rhizobium |
description |
The tree legume Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Witt., has a great potential for utilization in tropical agriculture, particularly in animal nutrition as an alternative protein source during dry periods, and in enriching the soil, both uses relying on its capacity for nitrogen fixation. With the aim of evaluating symbiotic nitrogen fixation in Leucaena an experiment was performed at the Instituto de Zootecnia, Nova Odessa, São Paulo, in cooperation with and following the experimental guidelines of the Niftal Project. The field trial was designed to test the effect of fertilization (lime + single super phosphate + KCl) and sources of nitrogen (inoculation, urea and control) in a 2 x 3 factorial design. The total nitrogen and dry matter production in kg.ha-1 –year-1 at the first cut were respectively: 106 ± 14 and 2416 ± 335, for fertilization + inoculation; 80 ± 14 and 1906 ± 316, for fertilization + urea; 70 ± 8 and 1798 ± 249, for fertilization; 67 ± 10 and 1902 ± 359, for inoculation; 29 ± 8 and 754 ± 193, for urea; and 50 ± 10 and 1039 ± 247 for the control. The statistical analysis showed significant responses to fertilization and/or inoculation, this latter being the best source of nitrogen in the experiment. The treatment with urea alone was the worst of all, suggesting the occurrence of acidification, which not only adversely affected the micro but also the macrosymbiont. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-04-16 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/17574 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/17574 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/17574/11799 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.19, s/n, jun. 1984; 275-279 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.19, s/n, jun. 1984; 275-279 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416652886376448 |