Response of Leucaena to inoculation compared under different fertilizer treatments

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Valarini, Maria José
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Bufarah, Gilberto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/17574
Resumo: The tree legume Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Witt., has a great potential for utilization in tropical agriculture, particularly in animal nutrition as an alternative protein source during dry periods, and in enriching the soil, both uses relying on its capacity for nitrogen fixation. With the aim of evaluating symbiotic nitrogen fixation in Leucaena an experiment was performed at the Instituto de Zootecnia, Nova Odessa, São Paulo, in cooperation with and following the experimental guidelines of the Niftal Project. The field trial was designed to test the effect of fertilization (lime + single super phosphate + KCl) and sources of nitrogen (inoculation, urea and control) in a 2 x 3 factorial design. The total nitrogen and dry matter production in kg.ha-1 –year-1 at the first cut were respectively: 106 ± 14 and 2416 ± 335, for fertilization + inoculation; 80 ± 14 and 1906 ± 316, for fertilization + urea; 70 ± 8 and 1798 ± 249, for fertilization; 67 ± 10 and 1902 ± 359, for inoculation; 29 ± 8 and 754 ± 193, for urea; and 50 ± 10 and 1039 ± 247 for the control. The statistical analysis showed significant responses to fertilization and/or inoculation, this latter being the best source of nitrogen in the experiment. The treatment with urea alone was the worst of all, suggesting the occurrence of acidification, which not only adversely affected the micro but also the macrosymbiont.
id EMBRAPA-4_663b6785a5ef142c123ebe4627552920
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/17574
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Response of Leucaena to inoculation compared under different fertilizer treatmentsResposta de Leucaena à inoculação comparada a diferentes tratamentos fertilizantesN2 fixation; nodulation; Rhizobiumfixação de N2; nodulação; RhizobiumThe tree legume Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Witt., has a great potential for utilization in tropical agriculture, particularly in animal nutrition as an alternative protein source during dry periods, and in enriching the soil, both uses relying on its capacity for nitrogen fixation. With the aim of evaluating symbiotic nitrogen fixation in Leucaena an experiment was performed at the Instituto de Zootecnia, Nova Odessa, São Paulo, in cooperation with and following the experimental guidelines of the Niftal Project. The field trial was designed to test the effect of fertilization (lime + single super phosphate + KCl) and sources of nitrogen (inoculation, urea and control) in a 2 x 3 factorial design. The total nitrogen and dry matter production in kg.ha-1 –year-1 at the first cut were respectively: 106 ± 14 and 2416 ± 335, for fertilization + inoculation; 80 ± 14 and 1906 ± 316, for fertilization + urea; 70 ± 8 and 1798 ± 249, for fertilization; 67 ± 10 and 1902 ± 359, for inoculation; 29 ± 8 and 754 ± 193, for urea; and 50 ± 10 and 1039 ± 247 for the control. The statistical analysis showed significant responses to fertilization and/or inoculation, this latter being the best source of nitrogen in the experiment. The treatment with urea alone was the worst of all, suggesting the occurrence of acidification, which not only adversely affected the micro but also the macrosymbiont.A Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wittt, uma leguminosa arbórea, apresenta grande potencial de utilização em agricultura tropical, principalmente, quer pelo seu emprego em nutrição animal como alternativa proteica para os períodos secos, quer pelo emprego no enriquecimento do solo, inferindo-se à sua capacidade de fixação biológica de nitrogênio. Assim, visando-se avaliar a fixação simbiótica de N2 em leucena, está sendo conduzido no Instituto de Zootecnia - Nova Odessa (SP), em convênio, e segundo padrões experimentais do "Niftal Project", um ensaio de campo comparando o efeito de adubação (calagem + superfosfato simples + KCl) e fontes de fornecimento de nitrogênio (inoculação, uréia e testemunha), num arranjo fatorial 2 x 3. As produções de N total e matéria seca em kg/há-1/ano-1 para os tratamentos no primeiro corte foram, respectivamente: 106 ± 14 e 2416 ± 335, para adubação + inoculação; 80± 14 e 1906 ± 316, para adubação + uréia; 70 ± 8 e 1798 ± 249, para adubação; 67± 10 e 1902 ± 359, para inoculação; 29 ± 8 e 754 ± 193, para uréia e 50 ± 10 e 1039 ± 247, para a testemunha. As análises estatísticas revelaram respostas significativas para os tratamentos contendo adubação e/ou inoculação, sendo esta última, significativamente, a melhor fonte de nitrogénio no experimento.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraValarini, Maria JoséBufarah, Gilberto2014-04-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/17574Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.19, s/n, jun. 1984; 275-279Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.19, s/n, jun. 1984; 275-2791678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/17574/11799info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-04-16T19:15:45Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/17574Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-04-16T19:15:45Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Response of Leucaena to inoculation compared under different fertilizer treatments
Resposta de Leucaena à inoculação comparada a diferentes tratamentos fertilizantes
title Response of Leucaena to inoculation compared under different fertilizer treatments
spellingShingle Response of Leucaena to inoculation compared under different fertilizer treatments
Valarini, Maria José
N2 fixation; nodulation; Rhizobium
fixação de N2; nodulação; Rhizobium
title_short Response of Leucaena to inoculation compared under different fertilizer treatments
title_full Response of Leucaena to inoculation compared under different fertilizer treatments
title_fullStr Response of Leucaena to inoculation compared under different fertilizer treatments
title_full_unstemmed Response of Leucaena to inoculation compared under different fertilizer treatments
title_sort Response of Leucaena to inoculation compared under different fertilizer treatments
author Valarini, Maria José
author_facet Valarini, Maria José
Bufarah, Gilberto
author_role author
author2 Bufarah, Gilberto
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Valarini, Maria José
Bufarah, Gilberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv N2 fixation; nodulation; Rhizobium
fixação de N2; nodulação; Rhizobium
topic N2 fixation; nodulation; Rhizobium
fixação de N2; nodulação; Rhizobium
description The tree legume Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Witt., has a great potential for utilization in tropical agriculture, particularly in animal nutrition as an alternative protein source during dry periods, and in enriching the soil, both uses relying on its capacity for nitrogen fixation. With the aim of evaluating symbiotic nitrogen fixation in Leucaena an experiment was performed at the Instituto de Zootecnia, Nova Odessa, São Paulo, in cooperation with and following the experimental guidelines of the Niftal Project. The field trial was designed to test the effect of fertilization (lime + single super phosphate + KCl) and sources of nitrogen (inoculation, urea and control) in a 2 x 3 factorial design. The total nitrogen and dry matter production in kg.ha-1 –year-1 at the first cut were respectively: 106 ± 14 and 2416 ± 335, for fertilization + inoculation; 80 ± 14 and 1906 ± 316, for fertilization + urea; 70 ± 8 and 1798 ± 249, for fertilization; 67 ± 10 and 1902 ± 359, for inoculation; 29 ± 8 and 754 ± 193, for urea; and 50 ± 10 and 1039 ± 247 for the control. The statistical analysis showed significant responses to fertilization and/or inoculation, this latter being the best source of nitrogen in the experiment. The treatment with urea alone was the worst of all, suggesting the occurrence of acidification, which not only adversely affected the micro but also the macrosymbiont.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-04-16
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/17574
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/17574
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/17574/11799
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.19, s/n, jun. 1984; 275-279
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.19, s/n, jun. 1984; 275-279
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416652886376448