Predation of amaranthus quitensis H.B.H. seeds in soybean crops: influence of the tillage system

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nisensohn, Luisa
Data de Publicação: 1999
Outros Autores: Faccini, Delma, Montero, Guillermo, Lietti, Marcela
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5194
Resumo: The objective was to evaluate the losses of the superficial bank of Amaranthus quitensis seeds, due to insect predation, in a soybean crop and in the subsequent fallow, in two tillage systems. Experiments were conducted during 1994/95 and 1995/96. To estimate predation rates, trays covered with wire meshes to prevent rodent predation, and with fine sheer net (tulle) in the control treatment were used; 100 weed seeds were sown in each tray, and the number of remaining seeds was registered every 15 days. Pitfall traps were used to identify insects species occurring in the field and to estimate their abundance. The carabid Notiobia cupripennis was captured in pitfall traps, the higher population found during March (4.5 and 5.8 insect/trap in conventional tillage and 2.7 and 3.3 insect/trap in no-tillage). The highest predation rates was also registered in March (5.6% and 8% in conventional tillage and 2.7% and 3.8% in no-tillage) and both systems were significantly different as to abundance and predation. No significant differences were found from April to June, and the number of insects and predation rates decreased. There was a positive correlation between the predation rates and the values of insect abundance in both years.
id EMBRAPA-4_7b956b534244fbb118f25a326f4a5d3d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/5194
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Predation of amaranthus quitensis H.B.H. seeds in soybean crops: influence of the tillage systemPredacion de semillas de Amaranthus quitensis H.B.K. en un cultivo de soja: influencia del sistema de siembraNotiobia cupripennis; seed bank; tillage; weedNotiobia cupripennis; banco de semillas; labranzas; malezasThe objective was to evaluate the losses of the superficial bank of Amaranthus quitensis seeds, due to insect predation, in a soybean crop and in the subsequent fallow, in two tillage systems. Experiments were conducted during 1994/95 and 1995/96. To estimate predation rates, trays covered with wire meshes to prevent rodent predation, and with fine sheer net (tulle) in the control treatment were used; 100 weed seeds were sown in each tray, and the number of remaining seeds was registered every 15 days. Pitfall traps were used to identify insects species occurring in the field and to estimate their abundance. The carabid Notiobia cupripennis was captured in pitfall traps, the higher population found during March (4.5 and 5.8 insect/trap in conventional tillage and 2.7 and 3.3 insect/trap in no-tillage). The highest predation rates was also registered in March (5.6% and 8% in conventional tillage and 2.7% and 3.8% in no-tillage) and both systems were significantly different as to abundance and predation. No significant differences were found from April to June, and the number of insects and predation rates decreased. There was a positive correlation between the predation rates and the values of insect abundance in both years.El objetivo fue evaluar las pérdidas del banco superficial de semillas de Amaranthus quitensis H.B.K. (yuyo colorado) debidas a la predación por insectos en un cultivo de soja y en el barbecho posterior, en dos sistemas de laboreo. Los experimentos se realizaron durante las campañas 94/95 y 95/96. Para calcular la tasa de predación se emplearon bandejas cubiertas con tejido para evitar el ingreso de roedores y con tela de tul en los tratamientos testigos; en cada una se sembraron 100 semillas de la maleza y cada 15 días se registró el número de semillas remanentes. Para determinar los insectos presentes y su abundancia se emplearon trampas "pitfall". Entre los insectos capturados se encontró el carábido Notiobia cupripennis, su mayor abundancia se registró en marzo (4,5 y 5,8 insectos/trampa en convencional y 2,7 y 3,3 insectos/trampa en siembra directa), coincidiendo con las tasas de predación más altas (5,6% y 8% en convencional y 2,7% y 3,8% en siembra directa); tanto en abundancia como en predación se observaron diferencias significativas entre ambos sistemas. A partir de este mes, las diferencias no fueron significativas, el número de insectos y la tasa de predación disminuyeron. En ambos años existió una correlación positiva entre estas variables.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraNisensohn, LuisaFaccini, DelmaMontero, GuillermoLietti, Marcela1999-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5194Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.34, n.3, mar. 1999; 377-384Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.34, n.3, mar. 1999; 377-3841678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5194/2386info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2010-07-07T14:30:22Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/5194Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2010-07-07T14:30:22Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Predation of amaranthus quitensis H.B.H. seeds in soybean crops: influence of the tillage system
Predacion de semillas de Amaranthus quitensis H.B.K. en un cultivo de soja: influencia del sistema de siembra
title Predation of amaranthus quitensis H.B.H. seeds in soybean crops: influence of the tillage system
spellingShingle Predation of amaranthus quitensis H.B.H. seeds in soybean crops: influence of the tillage system
Nisensohn, Luisa
Notiobia cupripennis; seed bank; tillage; weed
Notiobia cupripennis; banco de semillas; labranzas; malezas
title_short Predation of amaranthus quitensis H.B.H. seeds in soybean crops: influence of the tillage system
title_full Predation of amaranthus quitensis H.B.H. seeds in soybean crops: influence of the tillage system
title_fullStr Predation of amaranthus quitensis H.B.H. seeds in soybean crops: influence of the tillage system
title_full_unstemmed Predation of amaranthus quitensis H.B.H. seeds in soybean crops: influence of the tillage system
title_sort Predation of amaranthus quitensis H.B.H. seeds in soybean crops: influence of the tillage system
author Nisensohn, Luisa
author_facet Nisensohn, Luisa
Faccini, Delma
Montero, Guillermo
Lietti, Marcela
author_role author
author2 Faccini, Delma
Montero, Guillermo
Lietti, Marcela
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nisensohn, Luisa
Faccini, Delma
Montero, Guillermo
Lietti, Marcela
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Notiobia cupripennis; seed bank; tillage; weed
Notiobia cupripennis; banco de semillas; labranzas; malezas
topic Notiobia cupripennis; seed bank; tillage; weed
Notiobia cupripennis; banco de semillas; labranzas; malezas
description The objective was to evaluate the losses of the superficial bank of Amaranthus quitensis seeds, due to insect predation, in a soybean crop and in the subsequent fallow, in two tillage systems. Experiments were conducted during 1994/95 and 1995/96. To estimate predation rates, trays covered with wire meshes to prevent rodent predation, and with fine sheer net (tulle) in the control treatment were used; 100 weed seeds were sown in each tray, and the number of remaining seeds was registered every 15 days. Pitfall traps were used to identify insects species occurring in the field and to estimate their abundance. The carabid Notiobia cupripennis was captured in pitfall traps, the higher population found during March (4.5 and 5.8 insect/trap in conventional tillage and 2.7 and 3.3 insect/trap in no-tillage). The highest predation rates was also registered in March (5.6% and 8% in conventional tillage and 2.7% and 3.8% in no-tillage) and both systems were significantly different as to abundance and predation. No significant differences were found from April to June, and the number of insects and predation rates decreased. There was a positive correlation between the predation rates and the values of insect abundance in both years.
publishDate 1999
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1999-03-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5194
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5194
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5194/2386
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.34, n.3, mar. 1999; 377-384
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.34, n.3, mar. 1999; 377-384
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416664872648704