Resistance of Amaranthus quitensis to imazethapyr and clhorimuron-ethyl
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2001 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/6173 |
Resumo: | The objective was to determine the magnitude of resistance of A. quitensis H.B.K. biotypes to imazethapyr and chlorimuron-ethyl. Weed biotypes were collected at Zavalla, General Baldissera, Marcos Juárez y Las Rosas. The herbicides were applied at 1/8x, 1/4x, 1/2x, 1x, 5x, 10x and 20x the suggested rate. Weed mortality and reduction of biomass related with untreated plants were evaluated. Herbicides concentrations required to reduce growth by 50% (GR50) were determined. Resistance ratio (GR50 resistant/GR50 susceptible) was calculated to indicate the degree of resistance. Zavalla showed high susceptibility, with 1/2 of the suggested rate of both herbicides mortality reached 95%. General Baldissera was cross-resistant; with rates 20 times superior to the recommended field use rate mortality was 57.5% and 20% for imazethapyr and clhorimuron-ethyl, respectively. Resistance ratios of this biotype compared with Zavalla were 165 and 246 for imazethapyr and chlorimuron-ethyl, respectively. Las Rosas y Marcos Juárez were resistant to imazethapyr but showed high susceptibility to chlorimuron-ethyl. The resistance patterns showed by the biotypes could be associated with differences in the selection pressure at each location. |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_e57c94753aada218faa7821a3fe2d3f8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/6173 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Resistance of Amaranthus quitensis to imazethapyr and clhorimuron-ethylResistencia de Amaranthus quitensis a imazetapir y clorimurón-etilbiotypes; weeds; herbicide resistancebiotipos; malezas; resistencia a los herbicidasThe objective was to determine the magnitude of resistance of A. quitensis H.B.K. biotypes to imazethapyr and chlorimuron-ethyl. Weed biotypes were collected at Zavalla, General Baldissera, Marcos Juárez y Las Rosas. The herbicides were applied at 1/8x, 1/4x, 1/2x, 1x, 5x, 10x and 20x the suggested rate. Weed mortality and reduction of biomass related with untreated plants were evaluated. Herbicides concentrations required to reduce growth by 50% (GR50) were determined. Resistance ratio (GR50 resistant/GR50 susceptible) was calculated to indicate the degree of resistance. Zavalla showed high susceptibility, with 1/2 of the suggested rate of both herbicides mortality reached 95%. General Baldissera was cross-resistant; with rates 20 times superior to the recommended field use rate mortality was 57.5% and 20% for imazethapyr and clhorimuron-ethyl, respectively. Resistance ratios of this biotype compared with Zavalla were 165 and 246 for imazethapyr and chlorimuron-ethyl, respectively. Las Rosas y Marcos Juárez were resistant to imazethapyr but showed high susceptibility to chlorimuron-ethyl. The resistance patterns showed by the biotypes could be associated with differences in the selection pressure at each location.El objetivo de este trabajo fue establecer la existencia de biotipos de A. quitensis H.B.K. resistentes a imazetapir y clorimurón-etil. Se utilizaron semillas recolectadas en las localidades de Zavalla, General Baldissera, Marcos Juárez y Las Rosas. Las dosis de herbicidas utilizadas fueron 1/8x, 1/4x, 1/2x, 1x, 5x, 10x y 20x de la dosis de uso recomendada. Se determinó la mortalidad y biomasa de las plantas tratadas. Se calcularon las dosis de herbicidas requeridas para reducir en un 50% la biomasa de las plantas de la maleza (GR50) y se estimó la relación entre GR50 del biotipo resistente y GR50 del susceptible (factor de resistencia). El biotipo Zavalla resultó muy susceptible; con la mitad de la dosis de uso de ambos herbicidas la mortalidad fue 95%. El biotipo General Baldissera presentó resistencia cruzada; con dosis 20 veces superiores a las recomendadas, la mortalidad fue 57,5% y 20% para imazetapir y clorimurón-etil, respectivamente. El factor de resistencia de este biotipo respecto a Zavalla fue 165 y 246 para imazetapir y clorimurón-etil, respectivamente. Los biotipos Las Rosas y Marcos Juárez fueron resistentes a imazetapir y sin embargo resultaron muy susceptibles a clorimurón-etil. Las diferencias en los patrones de resistencia estarían asociadas con distintos niveles de presión de selección en las poblaciones analizadas. Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraTuesca, DanielNisensohn, Luisa2001-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/6173Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.36, n.4, abr. 2001; 601-606Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.36, n.4, abr. 2001; 601-6061678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/6173/3238info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2010-08-09T12:47:47Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/6173Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2010-08-09T12:47:47Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Resistance of Amaranthus quitensis to imazethapyr and clhorimuron-ethyl Resistencia de Amaranthus quitensis a imazetapir y clorimurón-etil |
title |
Resistance of Amaranthus quitensis to imazethapyr and clhorimuron-ethyl |
spellingShingle |
Resistance of Amaranthus quitensis to imazethapyr and clhorimuron-ethyl Tuesca, Daniel biotypes; weeds; herbicide resistance biotipos; malezas; resistencia a los herbicidas |
title_short |
Resistance of Amaranthus quitensis to imazethapyr and clhorimuron-ethyl |
title_full |
Resistance of Amaranthus quitensis to imazethapyr and clhorimuron-ethyl |
title_fullStr |
Resistance of Amaranthus quitensis to imazethapyr and clhorimuron-ethyl |
title_full_unstemmed |
Resistance of Amaranthus quitensis to imazethapyr and clhorimuron-ethyl |
title_sort |
Resistance of Amaranthus quitensis to imazethapyr and clhorimuron-ethyl |
author |
Tuesca, Daniel |
author_facet |
Tuesca, Daniel Nisensohn, Luisa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nisensohn, Luisa |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tuesca, Daniel Nisensohn, Luisa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
biotypes; weeds; herbicide resistance biotipos; malezas; resistencia a los herbicidas |
topic |
biotypes; weeds; herbicide resistance biotipos; malezas; resistencia a los herbicidas |
description |
The objective was to determine the magnitude of resistance of A. quitensis H.B.K. biotypes to imazethapyr and chlorimuron-ethyl. Weed biotypes were collected at Zavalla, General Baldissera, Marcos Juárez y Las Rosas. The herbicides were applied at 1/8x, 1/4x, 1/2x, 1x, 5x, 10x and 20x the suggested rate. Weed mortality and reduction of biomass related with untreated plants were evaluated. Herbicides concentrations required to reduce growth by 50% (GR50) were determined. Resistance ratio (GR50 resistant/GR50 susceptible) was calculated to indicate the degree of resistance. Zavalla showed high susceptibility, with 1/2 of the suggested rate of both herbicides mortality reached 95%. General Baldissera was cross-resistant; with rates 20 times superior to the recommended field use rate mortality was 57.5% and 20% for imazethapyr and clhorimuron-ethyl, respectively. Resistance ratios of this biotype compared with Zavalla were 165 and 246 for imazethapyr and chlorimuron-ethyl, respectively. Las Rosas y Marcos Juárez were resistant to imazethapyr but showed high susceptibility to chlorimuron-ethyl. The resistance patterns showed by the biotypes could be associated with differences in the selection pressure at each location. |
publishDate |
2001 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2001-04-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/6173 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/6173 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/6173/3238 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.36, n.4, abr. 2001; 601-606 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.36, n.4, abr. 2001; 601-606 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416690849021952 |