Yield and chemical composition of forage in crop‑livestock integration in different sowing time

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pariz, Cristiano Magalhães
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Azenha, Mariana Vieira, Andreotti, Marcelo, Araújo, Fabio Cruz de Mello, Ulian, Nelson de Araújo, Bergamaschine, Antonio Fernando
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/8272
Resumo: The objective of this work was to evaluate the dry matter yield and chemical composition of forage in crop-livestock integration, according to different sowing dates. A randomized experimental block design in a 4x3 factorial scheme was used, with four forage plants (palisadegrass, Urochloa brizantha; fox millet, Setaria italica; pearl millet, Pennisetum glaucum; and sorghum, Sorghum bicolor) sowed on three dates, in two season (winter/spring and summer/autumn), in succession to soybean. The pearl millet and sorghum produced the highest amount of dry matter in all sowing dates, at both growing seasons and, contrary to palisadegrass and fox millet, it did not reduce the amount of total digestible nutrients. Crude protein levels decreased with the advancement of sowing dates in winter/spring and increased in summer/autumn, except for palisadegrass and pearl millet. Sorghum showed the lowest concentrations of neutral detergent fiber in the second and third sowing dates in winter/spring, and in the first sowing date in summer/autumn. In the second and third sowing dates in winter/spring, sorghum showed the lowest content of acid detergent fiber. In relation to the cell wall components, only the hemicellulose contents did not change in the forages due to sowing dates, at both seasons.
id EMBRAPA-4_96327d47567d9f011d40b4f2e7f089be
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/8272
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Yield and chemical composition of forage in crop‑livestock integration in different sowing timeProdução e composição bromatológica de forrageiras em sistema de integração lavoura‑pecuária em diferentes épocas de semeaduraPennisetum glaucum; Setaria italica; Sorghum bicolor; Urochloa brizantha; no-tillage systemPennisetum glaucum; Setaria italica; Sorghum bicolor; Urochloa brizantha; sistema plantio diretoThe objective of this work was to evaluate the dry matter yield and chemical composition of forage in crop-livestock integration, according to different sowing dates. A randomized experimental block design in a 4x3 factorial scheme was used, with four forage plants (palisadegrass, Urochloa brizantha; fox millet, Setaria italica; pearl millet, Pennisetum glaucum; and sorghum, Sorghum bicolor) sowed on three dates, in two season (winter/spring and summer/autumn), in succession to soybean. The pearl millet and sorghum produced the highest amount of dry matter in all sowing dates, at both growing seasons and, contrary to palisadegrass and fox millet, it did not reduce the amount of total digestible nutrients. Crude protein levels decreased with the advancement of sowing dates in winter/spring and increased in summer/autumn, except for palisadegrass and pearl millet. Sorghum showed the lowest concentrations of neutral detergent fiber in the second and third sowing dates in winter/spring, and in the first sowing date in summer/autumn. In the second and third sowing dates in winter/spring, sorghum showed the lowest content of acid detergent fiber. In relation to the cell wall components, only the hemicellulose contents did not change in the forages due to sowing dates, at both seasons.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a produção de matéria seca e a composição bromatológica de forrageiras em sistema de integração lavoura-pecuária, em diferentes datas de semeadura. Foi usado delineamento experimental de blocos ao acaso, em esquema fatorial 4x3, com quatro forrageiras – braquiária, Urochloa brizantha; capim-moa, Setaria italica; milheto, Pennisetum glaucum; e sorgo forrageiro, Sorghum bicolor – semeadas em três datas nas estações inverno/primavera e verão/outono, em sucessão à soja. O milheto e o sorgo forrageiro produziram maior quantidade de matéria seca em todas as datas de semeadura, nas duas estações de cultivo e, ao contrário da braquiária e do capim-moa, não diminuíram o teor de nutrientes digestíveis totais no inverno/primavera. Os teores de proteína bruta reduziram com o avanço das datas de semeadura no inverno/primavera e aumentaram no verão/outono, exceto para braquiária e milheto. O sorgo apresentou os menores teores de fibras em detergente neutro nas segunda e terceira datas de semeadura no inverno/primavera, e na primeira data de semeadura no verão/outono. Nas segunda e terceiras datas do inverno/primavera, o sorgo apresentou menor teor de fibras em detergente ácido. Quanto aos constituintes da parede celular, apenas os teores de hemicelulose não se alteram nas forrageiras em virtude das datas de semeadura, em ambas as estações.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Pariz, Cristiano MagalhãesAzenha, Mariana VieiraAndreotti, MarceloAraújo, Fabio Cruz de MelloUlian, Nelson de AraújoBergamaschine, Antonio Fernando2012-01-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/8272Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.46, n.10, out. 2011: Número Temático Sistemas de Integração Lavoura-Pecuária-Floresta; 1392-1400Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.46, n.10, out. 2011: Número Temático Sistemas de Integração Lavoura-Pecuária-Floresta; 1392-14001678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/8272/6655https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/8272/3940info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-06-24T17:01:59Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/8272Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-06-24T17:01:59Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Yield and chemical composition of forage in crop‑livestock integration in different sowing time
Produção e composição bromatológica de forrageiras em sistema de integração lavoura‑pecuária em diferentes épocas de semeadura
title Yield and chemical composition of forage in crop‑livestock integration in different sowing time
spellingShingle Yield and chemical composition of forage in crop‑livestock integration in different sowing time
Pariz, Cristiano Magalhães
Pennisetum glaucum; Setaria italica; Sorghum bicolor; Urochloa brizantha; no-tillage system
Pennisetum glaucum; Setaria italica; Sorghum bicolor; Urochloa brizantha; sistema plantio direto
title_short Yield and chemical composition of forage in crop‑livestock integration in different sowing time
title_full Yield and chemical composition of forage in crop‑livestock integration in different sowing time
title_fullStr Yield and chemical composition of forage in crop‑livestock integration in different sowing time
title_full_unstemmed Yield and chemical composition of forage in crop‑livestock integration in different sowing time
title_sort Yield and chemical composition of forage in crop‑livestock integration in different sowing time
author Pariz, Cristiano Magalhães
author_facet Pariz, Cristiano Magalhães
Azenha, Mariana Vieira
Andreotti, Marcelo
Araújo, Fabio Cruz de Mello
Ulian, Nelson de Araújo
Bergamaschine, Antonio Fernando
author_role author
author2 Azenha, Mariana Vieira
Andreotti, Marcelo
Araújo, Fabio Cruz de Mello
Ulian, Nelson de Araújo
Bergamaschine, Antonio Fernando
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pariz, Cristiano Magalhães
Azenha, Mariana Vieira
Andreotti, Marcelo
Araújo, Fabio Cruz de Mello
Ulian, Nelson de Araújo
Bergamaschine, Antonio Fernando
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pennisetum glaucum; Setaria italica; Sorghum bicolor; Urochloa brizantha; no-tillage system
Pennisetum glaucum; Setaria italica; Sorghum bicolor; Urochloa brizantha; sistema plantio direto
topic Pennisetum glaucum; Setaria italica; Sorghum bicolor; Urochloa brizantha; no-tillage system
Pennisetum glaucum; Setaria italica; Sorghum bicolor; Urochloa brizantha; sistema plantio direto
description The objective of this work was to evaluate the dry matter yield and chemical composition of forage in crop-livestock integration, according to different sowing dates. A randomized experimental block design in a 4x3 factorial scheme was used, with four forage plants (palisadegrass, Urochloa brizantha; fox millet, Setaria italica; pearl millet, Pennisetum glaucum; and sorghum, Sorghum bicolor) sowed on three dates, in two season (winter/spring and summer/autumn), in succession to soybean. The pearl millet and sorghum produced the highest amount of dry matter in all sowing dates, at both growing seasons and, contrary to palisadegrass and fox millet, it did not reduce the amount of total digestible nutrients. Crude protein levels decreased with the advancement of sowing dates in winter/spring and increased in summer/autumn, except for palisadegrass and pearl millet. Sorghum showed the lowest concentrations of neutral detergent fiber in the second and third sowing dates in winter/spring, and in the first sowing date in summer/autumn. In the second and third sowing dates in winter/spring, sorghum showed the lowest content of acid detergent fiber. In relation to the cell wall components, only the hemicellulose contents did not change in the forages due to sowing dates, at both seasons.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-01-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/8272
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/8272
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/8272/6655
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/8272/3940
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.46, n.10, out. 2011: Número Temático Sistemas de Integração Lavoura-Pecuária-Floresta; 1392-1400
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.46, n.10, out. 2011: Número Temático Sistemas de Integração Lavoura-Pecuária-Floresta; 1392-1400
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416654433026048