Brazilian irradiated vaccine compared to british commercial vaccine "Dictol", against Dictyocaulus viviparus

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gennari, Solange Maria
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Duncan, James L.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15396
Resumo: This study was carried out at the Divisão de Ciências Animais of the Centro de Energia Nuclear para a Agricultura (CENA). in Piracicaba, SP, Brazil, to test and compare the immunity produced by the use of vaccine prepared at the CENA using gamma irradiation and the British comrnercial Dictol against Dictyocaulus viviporus (Block 1782). Eighteen calves were divided into three groups, each with six animals: group A received Dictol; group B, the gamma irradiated vaccine; and C, without vaccine, was the control group. Two doses were given orally with a tour-week interval. One month after the second dose the calves were challenged with D. viviparus larvae at the rate of 60 larvae per kg of body weight, and five weeks later all animals were killed. The number of lungworms was then determined. There was little difference between treatments A and B, but both had significantly reduced challenge worm burdens compared with group C, i.e. 84% for Dictol and 86% for CENA vaccinates. The clinical symptoms of husk were present in the three treatments, but they were minimal in the vaccinated animals. Both vaccines were efficient in the immunization of calves against D. viviparus.
id EMBRAPA-4_b27f5056a9a2a12a7649b8ce07b4993b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/15396
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Brazilian irradiated vaccine compared to british commercial vaccine "Dictol", against Dictyocaulus viviparusVacina brasileira irradiada, comparada com a britânica "Dictol", no combate ao Dictyocaulus viviparusbovine helminthosishelmintose bovinaThis study was carried out at the Divisão de Ciências Animais of the Centro de Energia Nuclear para a Agricultura (CENA). in Piracicaba, SP, Brazil, to test and compare the immunity produced by the use of vaccine prepared at the CENA using gamma irradiation and the British comrnercial Dictol against Dictyocaulus viviporus (Block 1782). Eighteen calves were divided into three groups, each with six animals: group A received Dictol; group B, the gamma irradiated vaccine; and C, without vaccine, was the control group. Two doses were given orally with a tour-week interval. One month after the second dose the calves were challenged with D. viviparus larvae at the rate of 60 larvae per kg of body weight, and five weeks later all animals were killed. The number of lungworms was then determined. There was little difference between treatments A and B, but both had significantly reduced challenge worm burdens compared with group C, i.e. 84% for Dictol and 86% for CENA vaccinates. The clinical symptoms of husk were present in the three treatments, but they were minimal in the vaccinated animals. Both vaccines were efficient in the immunization of calves against D. viviparus. Estudo realizado na Divisão de Ciências Animais, do Centro de Energia Nuclear da Agricultura (CENA), em Piracicaba, SP, visando testar e comparar a vacina do CENA, atenuada pela radiação gama, e a comercial britânica Dictol, aplicadas, ambas em bezerros, contra o Dictyocaulus viviparus (Bloch 1782). Dezoito animais foram divididos em três grupos de seis: grupo A, vacinado com Dictol; grupo B, com a vacina irradiada do CENA; e grupo C, sem vacina testemunha. Foram ministradas duas doses por via oral, com intervalo de quatro semanas. Um mês após a segunda dose, os animais dos três grupos foram submetidos ao teste de desafio, com 60 larvas por quilo de peso vivo, e cinco semanas depois, abatidos. Contou-se o número de vermes presentes nos pulmões. Os tratamentos A e B não diferiram entre si, mas foram significativamente inferiores ao C quanto ao número de vermes nos pulmões: houve redução de 86% no tratamento A e 84% no B, em comparação com a testemunha. Sintomas clínicos de dictiocaulose estiveram presentes em todos os animais, porém com um quadro mais ameno nos vacinados. As duas vacinas mostraram eficiência igual.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraGennari, Solange MariaDuncan, James L.2014-04-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15396Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.18, n.8, ago. 1983; 911-917Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.18, n.8, ago. 1983; 911-9171678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15396/9285info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-04-16T19:06:19Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/15396Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-04-16T19:06:19Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian irradiated vaccine compared to british commercial vaccine "Dictol", against Dictyocaulus viviparus
Vacina brasileira irradiada, comparada com a britânica "Dictol", no combate ao Dictyocaulus viviparus
title Brazilian irradiated vaccine compared to british commercial vaccine "Dictol", against Dictyocaulus viviparus
spellingShingle Brazilian irradiated vaccine compared to british commercial vaccine "Dictol", against Dictyocaulus viviparus
Gennari, Solange Maria
bovine helminthosis
helmintose bovina
title_short Brazilian irradiated vaccine compared to british commercial vaccine "Dictol", against Dictyocaulus viviparus
title_full Brazilian irradiated vaccine compared to british commercial vaccine "Dictol", against Dictyocaulus viviparus
title_fullStr Brazilian irradiated vaccine compared to british commercial vaccine "Dictol", against Dictyocaulus viviparus
title_full_unstemmed Brazilian irradiated vaccine compared to british commercial vaccine "Dictol", against Dictyocaulus viviparus
title_sort Brazilian irradiated vaccine compared to british commercial vaccine "Dictol", against Dictyocaulus viviparus
author Gennari, Solange Maria
author_facet Gennari, Solange Maria
Duncan, James L.
author_role author
author2 Duncan, James L.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gennari, Solange Maria
Duncan, James L.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv bovine helminthosis
helmintose bovina
topic bovine helminthosis
helmintose bovina
description This study was carried out at the Divisão de Ciências Animais of the Centro de Energia Nuclear para a Agricultura (CENA). in Piracicaba, SP, Brazil, to test and compare the immunity produced by the use of vaccine prepared at the CENA using gamma irradiation and the British comrnercial Dictol against Dictyocaulus viviporus (Block 1782). Eighteen calves were divided into three groups, each with six animals: group A received Dictol; group B, the gamma irradiated vaccine; and C, without vaccine, was the control group. Two doses were given orally with a tour-week interval. One month after the second dose the calves were challenged with D. viviparus larvae at the rate of 60 larvae per kg of body weight, and five weeks later all animals were killed. The number of lungworms was then determined. There was little difference between treatments A and B, but both had significantly reduced challenge worm burdens compared with group C, i.e. 84% for Dictol and 86% for CENA vaccinates. The clinical symptoms of husk were present in the three treatments, but they were minimal in the vaccinated animals. Both vaccines were efficient in the immunization of calves against D. viviparus.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-04-16
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15396
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15396
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15396/9285
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.18, n.8, ago. 1983; 911-917
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.18, n.8, ago. 1983; 911-917
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416685541130240