Experimental alternatives in the evaluation of families in the genetic improvement of bean plants

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Elaine Aparecida de
Data de Publicação: 2000
Outros Autores: Geraldi, Isaias Olívio, Ramalho, Magno Antonio Patto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5958
Resumo: The aim of this work was to evaluate the viability of using the augmented block designs and spatial analysis methods for early-stage selection in breeding programs for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). A total of 121 S2 progenies were evaluated in three locations: Lavras, Lambari and Patos de Minas, Brazil. A simple 11 x 11 lattice design was employed by location. Additionally, two controls, Carioca and EMGOPA 201-Ouro, were included. The split plots were composed by two 2 m lines with 15 seeds/m. The data of the production (g/plot) were submitted to a variance analysis, considering the following strategies: lattice design, augmented block design, randomized complete block design, Papadakis' method, moving means method, and check plots method. The comparison between the different strategies was done considering their efficiency in controlling the experimental error and in relation to the precision of the estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters obtained in each method. General results indicate that augmented block design is useful in earlier stage of selection, when the intensities of selection are moderate to low; however, this design is not useful for estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters due to lower precision of estimates; the use of check plots method did not improve the experimental precision; the nearest neighbour, Papadakis and moving means methods were efficient in removing the heterogeneity within blocks; this efficiency was equivalent to lattice analysis for estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters.
id EMBRAPA-4_b912b9ac307cab7458a3e41949c53418
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/5958
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Experimental alternatives in the evaluation of families in the genetic improvement of bean plantsAlternativas experimentais na avaliação de famílias em programas de melhoramento genético do feijoeirobreeding methods; genetic parameters; agronomic characters; statistical analysis; plant breeding; Phaseolus vulgarismétodos de melhoramento; parâmetros genéticos; características agronômicas; análises estatísticas; melhoramento de plantas; Phaseolus vulgarisThe aim of this work was to evaluate the viability of using the augmented block designs and spatial analysis methods for early-stage selection in breeding programs for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). A total of 121 S2 progenies were evaluated in three locations: Lavras, Lambari and Patos de Minas, Brazil. A simple 11 x 11 lattice design was employed by location. Additionally, two controls, Carioca and EMGOPA 201-Ouro, were included. The split plots were composed by two 2 m lines with 15 seeds/m. The data of the production (g/plot) were submitted to a variance analysis, considering the following strategies: lattice design, augmented block design, randomized complete block design, Papadakis' method, moving means method, and check plots method. The comparison between the different strategies was done considering their efficiency in controlling the experimental error and in relation to the precision of the estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters obtained in each method. General results indicate that augmented block design is useful in earlier stage of selection, when the intensities of selection are moderate to low; however, this design is not useful for estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters due to lower precision of estimates; the use of check plots method did not improve the experimental precision; the nearest neighbour, Papadakis and moving means methods were efficient in removing the heterogeneity within blocks; this efficiency was equivalent to lattice analysis for estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o emprego do delineamento em blocos aumentados e de métodos de análise espacial nas etapas iniciais dos programas de melhoramento do feijoeiro (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Foram avaliadas 121 famílias S2, provenientes de um programa de seleção recorrente, em três locais: Lavras, Lambari e Patos de Minas. Utilizou-se um látice simples 11 x 11, por local. Adicionalmente, foram incluídas duas testemunhas, Carioca e EMGOPA201-Ouro, cada uma alocada a intervalos regulares de cinco em cinco parcelas em cada bloco. A parcela foi composta por duas linhas de dois metros, com 15 sementes por metro. Os dados de produção de grãos (g/parcela) foram submetidos a uma análise de variância considerando os seguintes delineamentos e métodos: látice, blocos aumentados, blocos ao acaso, método de Papadakis, método das médias móveis e testemunha intercalar. Realizou-se a comparação entre as diferentes estratégias quanto à eficiência no controle do erro experimental e em relação à precisão das estimativas de parâmetros genéticos e fenotípicos obtidas em cada método. Constatou-se que o emprego do delineamento em blocos aumentados é viável para a seleção de famílias nas etapas iniciais dos programas de melhoramento genético, principalmente se for aplicada uma intensidade de seleção moderada; porém, esse delineamento não se mostrou apropriado para a estimação de parâmetros genéticos e fenotípicos, em virtude da baixa precisão das estimativas; o uso de testemunha intercalar não proporcionou melhoria na precisão experimental; os métodos de análise de vizinhança, Papadakis e o das médias móveis, foram eficientes no controle da heterogeneidade dos blocos, sendo esta eficiência similar àquela proporcionada pela análise em látice.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraSouza, Elaine Aparecida deGeraldi, Isaias OlívioRamalho, Magno Antonio Patto2000-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5958Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.35, n.9, set. 2000; 1765-1771Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.35, n.9, set. 2000; 1765-17711678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5958/3062info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-08-19T19:29:26Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/5958Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-08-19T19:29:26Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Experimental alternatives in the evaluation of families in the genetic improvement of bean plants
Alternativas experimentais na avaliação de famílias em programas de melhoramento genético do feijoeiro
title Experimental alternatives in the evaluation of families in the genetic improvement of bean plants
spellingShingle Experimental alternatives in the evaluation of families in the genetic improvement of bean plants
Souza, Elaine Aparecida de
breeding methods; genetic parameters; agronomic characters; statistical analysis; plant breeding; Phaseolus vulgaris
métodos de melhoramento; parâmetros genéticos; características agronômicas; análises estatísticas; melhoramento de plantas; Phaseolus vulgaris
title_short Experimental alternatives in the evaluation of families in the genetic improvement of bean plants
title_full Experimental alternatives in the evaluation of families in the genetic improvement of bean plants
title_fullStr Experimental alternatives in the evaluation of families in the genetic improvement of bean plants
title_full_unstemmed Experimental alternatives in the evaluation of families in the genetic improvement of bean plants
title_sort Experimental alternatives in the evaluation of families in the genetic improvement of bean plants
author Souza, Elaine Aparecida de
author_facet Souza, Elaine Aparecida de
Geraldi, Isaias Olívio
Ramalho, Magno Antonio Patto
author_role author
author2 Geraldi, Isaias Olívio
Ramalho, Magno Antonio Patto
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Elaine Aparecida de
Geraldi, Isaias Olívio
Ramalho, Magno Antonio Patto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv breeding methods; genetic parameters; agronomic characters; statistical analysis; plant breeding; Phaseolus vulgaris
métodos de melhoramento; parâmetros genéticos; características agronômicas; análises estatísticas; melhoramento de plantas; Phaseolus vulgaris
topic breeding methods; genetic parameters; agronomic characters; statistical analysis; plant breeding; Phaseolus vulgaris
métodos de melhoramento; parâmetros genéticos; características agronômicas; análises estatísticas; melhoramento de plantas; Phaseolus vulgaris
description The aim of this work was to evaluate the viability of using the augmented block designs and spatial analysis methods for early-stage selection in breeding programs for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). A total of 121 S2 progenies were evaluated in three locations: Lavras, Lambari and Patos de Minas, Brazil. A simple 11 x 11 lattice design was employed by location. Additionally, two controls, Carioca and EMGOPA 201-Ouro, were included. The split plots were composed by two 2 m lines with 15 seeds/m. The data of the production (g/plot) were submitted to a variance analysis, considering the following strategies: lattice design, augmented block design, randomized complete block design, Papadakis' method, moving means method, and check plots method. The comparison between the different strategies was done considering their efficiency in controlling the experimental error and in relation to the precision of the estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters obtained in each method. General results indicate that augmented block design is useful in earlier stage of selection, when the intensities of selection are moderate to low; however, this design is not useful for estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters due to lower precision of estimates; the use of check plots method did not improve the experimental precision; the nearest neighbour, Papadakis and moving means methods were efficient in removing the heterogeneity within blocks; this efficiency was equivalent to lattice analysis for estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters.
publishDate 2000
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2000-09-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5958
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5958
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5958/3062
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.35, n.9, set. 2000; 1765-1771
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.35, n.9, set. 2000; 1765-1771
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416694529523712