Chemical defoliation of hevea by thermal fogging
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16379 |
Resumo: | Chemical defoliation of rubber Hevea spp. planting, done about a month before the annual wintering, as a means of avoiding leaf diseases, has attracted considerable interest in the South of Bahia in the control of Microcyclus ulei and Phytophthora spp. Though ideally defoliants are applied by aerial spraying, the recent trend has been to substitute holicopters with fogging machines for treating mature rubber. Two field trials were carried out in 1981 with Tridiazuron, a defoliation of very low mammalian toxicity, fogging an emulsion concentrate with Leco 120-B in one, and with Tifa Tart in the other. The results were contrasting in the two sites: While satisfactory defoliation resulted in the first site, the treatment had no effect in the other. In the former an earlier and more uniform refoliation helped the trees to largely escape outbreaks of both M. ulei and Phytophthora spp. The differential effect obtained may be attributed to weak and different degrees of fog formation in the two sites. This preliminary work shows, nevertheless, that low toxicity defoliants can be fogged when aircraft is not available. |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_d27efe31fe3955643760394f447957e8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/16379 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Chemical defoliation of hevea by thermal foggingDesfolhamento químico da seringueira por termonebulizaçãonatural rubber; Microcyclus ulei; Phytophthora; defoliantborracha natural; Microcyclus ulei; Phytophthora spp.; desfolhanteChemical defoliation of rubber Hevea spp. planting, done about a month before the annual wintering, as a means of avoiding leaf diseases, has attracted considerable interest in the South of Bahia in the control of Microcyclus ulei and Phytophthora spp. Though ideally defoliants are applied by aerial spraying, the recent trend has been to substitute holicopters with fogging machines for treating mature rubber. Two field trials were carried out in 1981 with Tridiazuron, a defoliation of very low mammalian toxicity, fogging an emulsion concentrate with Leco 120-B in one, and with Tifa Tart in the other. The results were contrasting in the two sites: While satisfactory defoliation resulted in the first site, the treatment had no effect in the other. In the former an earlier and more uniform refoliation helped the trees to largely escape outbreaks of both M. ulei and Phytophthora spp. The differential effect obtained may be attributed to weak and different degrees of fog formation in the two sites. This preliminary work shows, nevertheless, that low toxicity defoliants can be fogged when aircraft is not available.O desfolhamento químico de plantações de seringueira (Hevea spp.) por volta de um mês antes da estação anual da troca das folhas, como forma de evitar doenças foliares, tem despertado grande interesse no sul da Bahia para controle de Microcyclus ulei e Phytophthora spp. Embora o ideal seja aplicação aérea de desfolhante, a tendência atual é a de substituir os helicópteros por termonebulizadores no tratamento de plantas adultas de seringueira. Dois experimentos de campo foram conduzidos em 1981 com Thidiazuron, um desfolhante de baixa toxicidade aos mamíferos, nebulizado através de emulsão concentrada, com termonebulizador Leco 120-B em um experimento, e com Tifa Tart em outro. Resultados contrastantes foram obtidos nos dois lugares: enquanto se verificou desfolhamento satisfatório no primeiro local, o mesmo tratamento não obteve efeito no outro. No primeiro, o reenfolhamento precoce e mais uniforme, ocasionado pelo bom desfolhamento, auxiliou bastante as plantas a escaparem dos surtos de M. ulei e Phytophthora spp. O efeito contrário obtido pode ser atribuído à fraca nebulização da formulação em diferente grau nos dois lugares. Este trabalho, embora preliminar, mostra que desfolhantes de baixa toxicidade podem ser nebulizados nos locais onde não haja disponibilidade de helicóptero.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraRomano, RonaldoRao, ShipathiSouza, Assiz Ramos deCastro, Antonio Maria Gomes de2014-04-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16379Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.17, n.11, nov. 1982; 1621-1626Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.17, n.11, nov. 1982; 1621-16261678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16379/10609info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-04-15T19:48:24Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/16379Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-04-15T19:48:24Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Chemical defoliation of hevea by thermal fogging Desfolhamento químico da seringueira por termonebulização |
title |
Chemical defoliation of hevea by thermal fogging |
spellingShingle |
Chemical defoliation of hevea by thermal fogging Romano, Ronaldo natural rubber; Microcyclus ulei; Phytophthora; defoliant borracha natural; Microcyclus ulei; Phytophthora spp.; desfolhante |
title_short |
Chemical defoliation of hevea by thermal fogging |
title_full |
Chemical defoliation of hevea by thermal fogging |
title_fullStr |
Chemical defoliation of hevea by thermal fogging |
title_full_unstemmed |
Chemical defoliation of hevea by thermal fogging |
title_sort |
Chemical defoliation of hevea by thermal fogging |
author |
Romano, Ronaldo |
author_facet |
Romano, Ronaldo Rao, Shipathi Souza, Assiz Ramos de Castro, Antonio Maria Gomes de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rao, Shipathi Souza, Assiz Ramos de Castro, Antonio Maria Gomes de |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Romano, Ronaldo Rao, Shipathi Souza, Assiz Ramos de Castro, Antonio Maria Gomes de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
natural rubber; Microcyclus ulei; Phytophthora; defoliant borracha natural; Microcyclus ulei; Phytophthora spp.; desfolhante |
topic |
natural rubber; Microcyclus ulei; Phytophthora; defoliant borracha natural; Microcyclus ulei; Phytophthora spp.; desfolhante |
description |
Chemical defoliation of rubber Hevea spp. planting, done about a month before the annual wintering, as a means of avoiding leaf diseases, has attracted considerable interest in the South of Bahia in the control of Microcyclus ulei and Phytophthora spp. Though ideally defoliants are applied by aerial spraying, the recent trend has been to substitute holicopters with fogging machines for treating mature rubber. Two field trials were carried out in 1981 with Tridiazuron, a defoliation of very low mammalian toxicity, fogging an emulsion concentrate with Leco 120-B in one, and with Tifa Tart in the other. The results were contrasting in the two sites: While satisfactory defoliation resulted in the first site, the treatment had no effect in the other. In the former an earlier and more uniform refoliation helped the trees to largely escape outbreaks of both M. ulei and Phytophthora spp. The differential effect obtained may be attributed to weak and different degrees of fog formation in the two sites. This preliminary work shows, nevertheless, that low toxicity defoliants can be fogged when aircraft is not available. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-04-15 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16379 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16379 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/16379/10609 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.17, n.11, nov. 1982; 1621-1626 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.17, n.11, nov. 1982; 1621-1626 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416668140011520 |