A quantitative fecal examination for fascioliasis in ruminants on several farms of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15285 |
Resumo: | The quantitative fecal examination for fascioliasis in the ruminants of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, was carried out and evaluated employing a four-layer sieve technique (Girão 1982) in comparison with the original Dennis et al. technique (1954).One hundred and fifty-eight bovine and one hundred and sixty-four ovine fecal samples were collected in five counties of Rio Grande do Sul where fascioliasis of ruminants is a problem. The percentages of cattle and sheep fecal samples in which eggs of Fasciola hepatica were found by means of the four-layer sieve technique developed by Girão (1982) and by the original Dennis et al. technique (1954) were 45,6% and 43,7% in the cattle, and 61,6% and 57,9% in the sheep, respectively. No significant difference was observed (P < 0,05) in the number of the detection rate of F. hepatica eggs. The mean value of e.p.g. in bovine feces was 10.3 by the present technique and 11.2 with Dennis et al. technique (1954). However, in ovine fecal samples, e.p.g. was 41.6, but 30,9 with the Dennis et al. technique (1954). |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_e8579905f3be44169f5b61c8cc59c727 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/15285 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A quantitative fecal examination for fascioliasis in ruminants on several farms of Rio Grande do Sul, BrazilDiagnóstico coprológico quantitativo da fasciolose de ruminantes no Rio Grande do SulFasciola hepatica; sheep; cattleFasciola hepatica; ovinos; bovinosThe quantitative fecal examination for fascioliasis in the ruminants of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, was carried out and evaluated employing a four-layer sieve technique (Girão 1982) in comparison with the original Dennis et al. technique (1954).One hundred and fifty-eight bovine and one hundred and sixty-four ovine fecal samples were collected in five counties of Rio Grande do Sul where fascioliasis of ruminants is a problem. The percentages of cattle and sheep fecal samples in which eggs of Fasciola hepatica were found by means of the four-layer sieve technique developed by Girão (1982) and by the original Dennis et al. technique (1954) were 45,6% and 43,7% in the cattle, and 61,6% and 57,9% in the sheep, respectively. No significant difference was observed (P < 0,05) in the number of the detection rate of F. hepatica eggs. The mean value of e.p.g. in bovine feces was 10.3 by the present technique and 11.2 with Dennis et al. technique (1954). However, in ovine fecal samples, e.p.g. was 41.6, but 30,9 with the Dennis et al. technique (1954).Realizou-se o diagnóstico coprológico quantitativo da fasciolose de ruminantes no Rio Grande do Sul, empregando-se a técnica de quatro tamises desenvolvida por Girão (1982), em comparação com a técnica de Dennis et al. (1954). Foram coletadas 158 amostras de fezes de bovinos e 164 de ovinos em cinco municípios do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, onde ocorre fasciolose diagnosticada através de dados de matadouros. Em todas as amostras, empregaram-se a técnica de quatro tamises (Girão 1982) e a de Dennis et al. (1954), totalizando 644 exames. A percentagem de amostras fecais de bovinos e ovinos nas quais foram detectados ovos de Fasciola hepatica pelas técnicas de quatro tamises (Girão 1982) e Dennis et al. (1954)foi de 45,6% e 43,7% em bovinos e de 61.6% e 57,9% em ovinos, respectivamente, não havendo, portanto, diferença significativa (P < 0,05) entre o número de amostras positivas para ovos de F. hepatica entre as duas técnicas. O número médio total de ovos por grama (o.p.g.) de fezes de bovinos foi de 10,3 na técnica de quatro tamises (Girão 1982), e na técnica de Dennis et al. (1954) foi de 11,2. Nas amostras de fezes de ovinos, verificou-se um o.p.g médio total de 41,6 pela técnica de quatro tamises (Girão 1982) e 30,9 pela técnica de Dennis et al. (1954).Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraGirão, Eneide SantiagoUeno, Hakaru2014-04-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15285Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.20, n.4, abr. 1985; 461-466Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.20, n.4, abr. 1985; 461-4661678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15285/9114info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-04-17T11:50:41Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/15285Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-04-17T11:50:41Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A quantitative fecal examination for fascioliasis in ruminants on several farms of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Diagnóstico coprológico quantitativo da fasciolose de ruminantes no Rio Grande do Sul |
title |
A quantitative fecal examination for fascioliasis in ruminants on several farms of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil |
spellingShingle |
A quantitative fecal examination for fascioliasis in ruminants on several farms of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Girão, Eneide Santiago Fasciola hepatica; sheep; cattle Fasciola hepatica; ovinos; bovinos |
title_short |
A quantitative fecal examination for fascioliasis in ruminants on several farms of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil |
title_full |
A quantitative fecal examination for fascioliasis in ruminants on several farms of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil |
title_fullStr |
A quantitative fecal examination for fascioliasis in ruminants on several farms of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
A quantitative fecal examination for fascioliasis in ruminants on several farms of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil |
title_sort |
A quantitative fecal examination for fascioliasis in ruminants on several farms of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil |
author |
Girão, Eneide Santiago |
author_facet |
Girão, Eneide Santiago Ueno, Hakaru |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ueno, Hakaru |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Girão, Eneide Santiago Ueno, Hakaru |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Fasciola hepatica; sheep; cattle Fasciola hepatica; ovinos; bovinos |
topic |
Fasciola hepatica; sheep; cattle Fasciola hepatica; ovinos; bovinos |
description |
The quantitative fecal examination for fascioliasis in the ruminants of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, was carried out and evaluated employing a four-layer sieve technique (Girão 1982) in comparison with the original Dennis et al. technique (1954).One hundred and fifty-eight bovine and one hundred and sixty-four ovine fecal samples were collected in five counties of Rio Grande do Sul where fascioliasis of ruminants is a problem. The percentages of cattle and sheep fecal samples in which eggs of Fasciola hepatica were found by means of the four-layer sieve technique developed by Girão (1982) and by the original Dennis et al. technique (1954) were 45,6% and 43,7% in the cattle, and 61,6% and 57,9% in the sheep, respectively. No significant difference was observed (P < 0,05) in the number of the detection rate of F. hepatica eggs. The mean value of e.p.g. in bovine feces was 10.3 by the present technique and 11.2 with Dennis et al. technique (1954). However, in ovine fecal samples, e.p.g. was 41.6, but 30,9 with the Dennis et al. technique (1954). |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-04-17 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15285 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15285 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15285/9114 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.20, n.4, abr. 1985; 461-466 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.20, n.4, abr. 1985; 461-466 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416679301054464 |