Phenology and thermal accumulation in grapevines in the Fronteira Oeste region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tomazetti, Tiago Camponogara
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Rossarolla, Márcia Denise, Zeist, André Ricardo, Giacobbo, Clevison Luiz, Welter, Leocir José, Alberto, Cleber Maus
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/21331
Resumo: The objective of this work was to evaluate the thermal requirement, obtained by different thermal time calculation methods, to characterize the grapevine (Vitis vinifera) phenology of 'Cabernet Sauvignon', 'Tannat', 'Ruby Cabernet', and 'Merlot' grown in the Fronteira Oeste region, of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The phenological development was followed for five seasons – 2005/2006 to 2009/2010. Minimum and maximum air temperatures were recorded daily, and the following eight thermal time methods were tested: M1.1, M1.2, and M1.3, which use only the down threshold temperature (10°C); M2.1 and M2.2, which also consider 25°C as the optimum temperature for development; and M3.1, M3.2, and M3.3, which, besides using the prior temperatures, consider 35°C as the upper threshold temperature of development. These methods were compared using the standard error (SE) estimates of accumulated heat. The SNK test was used to compare the thermal requirement between cultivars. M3.3 was the method that best simulated 'Tannat' and 'Merlot' development (1,823.1 and 1,780.8 degree‑day respectively). However, the least deviation was obtained in 'Cabernet Sauvignon' and 'Ruby Cabernet' using the M3.1 method (1,958.9 and 1,944.8 degree‑ day respectively). Methods employing the three cardinal temperatures showed greater accuracy. 'Tannat' and 'Merlot' are the cultivars that show the lowest thermal requirement to complete the cycle.
id EMBRAPA-4_ef19cb13dab8b61cd1c8855725eeadbc
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/21331
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Phenology and thermal accumulation in grapevines in the Fronteira Oeste region of Rio Grande do Sul, BrazilFenologia e acúmulo térmico em videiras viníferas na região da Fronteira Oeste do Rio Grande do SulVitis vinifera; plant development; degree‑day; thermal time; temperature; viticultureVitis vinifera; desenvolvimento vegetal; graus‑dia; soma térmica; temperatura; viticulturaThe objective of this work was to evaluate the thermal requirement, obtained by different thermal time calculation methods, to characterize the grapevine (Vitis vinifera) phenology of 'Cabernet Sauvignon', 'Tannat', 'Ruby Cabernet', and 'Merlot' grown in the Fronteira Oeste region, of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The phenological development was followed for five seasons – 2005/2006 to 2009/2010. Minimum and maximum air temperatures were recorded daily, and the following eight thermal time methods were tested: M1.1, M1.2, and M1.3, which use only the down threshold temperature (10°C); M2.1 and M2.2, which also consider 25°C as the optimum temperature for development; and M3.1, M3.2, and M3.3, which, besides using the prior temperatures, consider 35°C as the upper threshold temperature of development. These methods were compared using the standard error (SE) estimates of accumulated heat. The SNK test was used to compare the thermal requirement between cultivars. M3.3 was the method that best simulated 'Tannat' and 'Merlot' development (1,823.1 and 1,780.8 degree‑day respectively). However, the least deviation was obtained in 'Cabernet Sauvignon' and 'Ruby Cabernet' using the M3.1 method (1,958.9 and 1,944.8 degree‑ day respectively). Methods employing the three cardinal temperatures showed greater accuracy. 'Tannat' and 'Merlot' are the cultivars that show the lowest thermal requirement to complete the cycle.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a exigência térmica, obtida por diferentes métodos de cálculo, para caracterizar a fenologia das videiras (Vitis vinifera) 'Cabernet Sauvignon', 'Tannat', 'Ruby Cabernet' e 'Merlot', cultivadas na Fronteira Oeste do Rio Grande do Sul. O desenvolvimento fenológico foi acompanhado durante cinco safras – 2005/2006 a 2009/2010. As temperaturas mínimas e máximas do ar foram coletadas diariamente e foram testados oito métodos de soma térmica: M1.1, M1.2 e M1.3, que utilizaram somente a temperatura base inferior (10°C); M2.1 e M2.2, que consideraram também a temperatura ótima de desenvolvimento de 25°C; e M3.1, M3.2 e M3.3 que, além das anteriores, utilizaram 35°C como temperatura base superior do desenvolvimento. Estes métodos foram comparados pelo erro‑padrão das estimativas de soma térmica. O teste SNK foi utilizado para a comparação da exigência térmica entre as cultivares. O método M3.3 foi o que melhor simulou o desenvolvimento em 'Tannat' e 'Merlot' (1.823,1 e 1.780,8 graus‑dia respectivamente). No entanto, o menor desvio foi obtido em 'Cabernet Sauvignon' e 'Ruby Cabernet', pelo método M3.1 (1.958,9 e 1.944,8 graus‑dia respectivamente). Os métodos que empregaram as três temperaturas cardinais apresentaram maior precisão. 'Tannat' e 'Merlot' são as cultivares de videira que apresentam a menor exigência térmica para completar o ciclo.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraTomazetti, Tiago CamponogaraRossarolla, Márcia DeniseZeist, André RicardoGiacobbo, Clevison LuizWelter, Leocir JoséAlberto, Cleber Maus2015-12-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/21331Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.50, n.11, nov. 2015; 1033-1041Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.50, n.11, nov. 2015; 1033-10411678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/21331/13117Direitos autorais 2015 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-12-09T18:15:31Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/21331Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2015-12-09T18:15:31Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Phenology and thermal accumulation in grapevines in the Fronteira Oeste region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Fenologia e acúmulo térmico em videiras viníferas na região da Fronteira Oeste do Rio Grande do Sul
title Phenology and thermal accumulation in grapevines in the Fronteira Oeste region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
spellingShingle Phenology and thermal accumulation in grapevines in the Fronteira Oeste region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Tomazetti, Tiago Camponogara
Vitis vinifera; plant development; degree‑day; thermal time; temperature; viticulture
Vitis vinifera; desenvolvimento vegetal; graus‑dia; soma térmica; temperatura; viticultura
title_short Phenology and thermal accumulation in grapevines in the Fronteira Oeste region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
title_full Phenology and thermal accumulation in grapevines in the Fronteira Oeste region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
title_fullStr Phenology and thermal accumulation in grapevines in the Fronteira Oeste region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Phenology and thermal accumulation in grapevines in the Fronteira Oeste region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
title_sort Phenology and thermal accumulation in grapevines in the Fronteira Oeste region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
author Tomazetti, Tiago Camponogara
author_facet Tomazetti, Tiago Camponogara
Rossarolla, Márcia Denise
Zeist, André Ricardo
Giacobbo, Clevison Luiz
Welter, Leocir José
Alberto, Cleber Maus
author_role author
author2 Rossarolla, Márcia Denise
Zeist, André Ricardo
Giacobbo, Clevison Luiz
Welter, Leocir José
Alberto, Cleber Maus
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tomazetti, Tiago Camponogara
Rossarolla, Márcia Denise
Zeist, André Ricardo
Giacobbo, Clevison Luiz
Welter, Leocir José
Alberto, Cleber Maus
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Vitis vinifera; plant development; degree‑day; thermal time; temperature; viticulture
Vitis vinifera; desenvolvimento vegetal; graus‑dia; soma térmica; temperatura; viticultura
topic Vitis vinifera; plant development; degree‑day; thermal time; temperature; viticulture
Vitis vinifera; desenvolvimento vegetal; graus‑dia; soma térmica; temperatura; viticultura
description The objective of this work was to evaluate the thermal requirement, obtained by different thermal time calculation methods, to characterize the grapevine (Vitis vinifera) phenology of 'Cabernet Sauvignon', 'Tannat', 'Ruby Cabernet', and 'Merlot' grown in the Fronteira Oeste region, of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The phenological development was followed for five seasons – 2005/2006 to 2009/2010. Minimum and maximum air temperatures were recorded daily, and the following eight thermal time methods were tested: M1.1, M1.2, and M1.3, which use only the down threshold temperature (10°C); M2.1 and M2.2, which also consider 25°C as the optimum temperature for development; and M3.1, M3.2, and M3.3, which, besides using the prior temperatures, consider 35°C as the upper threshold temperature of development. These methods were compared using the standard error (SE) estimates of accumulated heat. The SNK test was used to compare the thermal requirement between cultivars. M3.3 was the method that best simulated 'Tannat' and 'Merlot' development (1,823.1 and 1,780.8 degree‑day respectively). However, the least deviation was obtained in 'Cabernet Sauvignon' and 'Ruby Cabernet' using the M3.1 method (1,958.9 and 1,944.8 degree‑ day respectively). Methods employing the three cardinal temperatures showed greater accuracy. 'Tannat' and 'Merlot' are the cultivars that show the lowest thermal requirement to complete the cycle.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/21331
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/21331
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/21331/13117
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2015 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2015 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.50, n.11, nov. 2015; 1033-1041
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.50, n.11, nov. 2015; 1033-1041
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416672283983872