Phenology and thermal accumulation in grapevines in the Fronteira Oeste region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/21331 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work was to evaluate the thermal requirement, obtained by different thermal time calculation methods, to characterize the grapevine (Vitis vinifera) phenology of 'Cabernet Sauvignon', 'Tannat', 'Ruby Cabernet', and 'Merlot' grown in the Fronteira Oeste region, of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The phenological development was followed for five seasons – 2005/2006 to 2009/2010. Minimum and maximum air temperatures were recorded daily, and the following eight thermal time methods were tested: M1.1, M1.2, and M1.3, which use only the down threshold temperature (10°C); M2.1 and M2.2, which also consider 25°C as the optimum temperature for development; and M3.1, M3.2, and M3.3, which, besides using the prior temperatures, consider 35°C as the upper threshold temperature of development. These methods were compared using the standard error (SE) estimates of accumulated heat. The SNK test was used to compare the thermal requirement between cultivars. M3.3 was the method that best simulated 'Tannat' and 'Merlot' development (1,823.1 and 1,780.8 degree‑day respectively). However, the least deviation was obtained in 'Cabernet Sauvignon' and 'Ruby Cabernet' using the M3.1 method (1,958.9 and 1,944.8 degree‑ day respectively). Methods employing the three cardinal temperatures showed greater accuracy. 'Tannat' and 'Merlot' are the cultivars that show the lowest thermal requirement to complete the cycle. |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_ef19cb13dab8b61cd1c8855725eeadbc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/21331 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Phenology and thermal accumulation in grapevines in the Fronteira Oeste region of Rio Grande do Sul, BrazilFenologia e acúmulo térmico em videiras viníferas na região da Fronteira Oeste do Rio Grande do SulVitis vinifera; plant development; degree‑day; thermal time; temperature; viticultureVitis vinifera; desenvolvimento vegetal; graus‑dia; soma térmica; temperatura; viticulturaThe objective of this work was to evaluate the thermal requirement, obtained by different thermal time calculation methods, to characterize the grapevine (Vitis vinifera) phenology of 'Cabernet Sauvignon', 'Tannat', 'Ruby Cabernet', and 'Merlot' grown in the Fronteira Oeste region, of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The phenological development was followed for five seasons – 2005/2006 to 2009/2010. Minimum and maximum air temperatures were recorded daily, and the following eight thermal time methods were tested: M1.1, M1.2, and M1.3, which use only the down threshold temperature (10°C); M2.1 and M2.2, which also consider 25°C as the optimum temperature for development; and M3.1, M3.2, and M3.3, which, besides using the prior temperatures, consider 35°C as the upper threshold temperature of development. These methods were compared using the standard error (SE) estimates of accumulated heat. The SNK test was used to compare the thermal requirement between cultivars. M3.3 was the method that best simulated 'Tannat' and 'Merlot' development (1,823.1 and 1,780.8 degree‑day respectively). However, the least deviation was obtained in 'Cabernet Sauvignon' and 'Ruby Cabernet' using the M3.1 method (1,958.9 and 1,944.8 degree‑ day respectively). Methods employing the three cardinal temperatures showed greater accuracy. 'Tannat' and 'Merlot' are the cultivars that show the lowest thermal requirement to complete the cycle.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a exigência térmica, obtida por diferentes métodos de cálculo, para caracterizar a fenologia das videiras (Vitis vinifera) 'Cabernet Sauvignon', 'Tannat', 'Ruby Cabernet' e 'Merlot', cultivadas na Fronteira Oeste do Rio Grande do Sul. O desenvolvimento fenológico foi acompanhado durante cinco safras – 2005/2006 a 2009/2010. As temperaturas mínimas e máximas do ar foram coletadas diariamente e foram testados oito métodos de soma térmica: M1.1, M1.2 e M1.3, que utilizaram somente a temperatura base inferior (10°C); M2.1 e M2.2, que consideraram também a temperatura ótima de desenvolvimento de 25°C; e M3.1, M3.2 e M3.3 que, além das anteriores, utilizaram 35°C como temperatura base superior do desenvolvimento. Estes métodos foram comparados pelo erro‑padrão das estimativas de soma térmica. O teste SNK foi utilizado para a comparação da exigência térmica entre as cultivares. O método M3.3 foi o que melhor simulou o desenvolvimento em 'Tannat' e 'Merlot' (1.823,1 e 1.780,8 graus‑dia respectivamente). No entanto, o menor desvio foi obtido em 'Cabernet Sauvignon' e 'Ruby Cabernet', pelo método M3.1 (1.958,9 e 1.944,8 graus‑dia respectivamente). Os métodos que empregaram as três temperaturas cardinais apresentaram maior precisão. 'Tannat' e 'Merlot' são as cultivares de videira que apresentam a menor exigência térmica para completar o ciclo.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraTomazetti, Tiago CamponogaraRossarolla, Márcia DeniseZeist, André RicardoGiacobbo, Clevison LuizWelter, Leocir JoséAlberto, Cleber Maus2015-12-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/21331Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.50, n.11, nov. 2015; 1033-1041Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.50, n.11, nov. 2015; 1033-10411678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/21331/13117Direitos autorais 2015 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-12-09T18:15:31Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/21331Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2015-12-09T18:15:31Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Phenology and thermal accumulation in grapevines in the Fronteira Oeste region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Fenologia e acúmulo térmico em videiras viníferas na região da Fronteira Oeste do Rio Grande do Sul |
title |
Phenology and thermal accumulation in grapevines in the Fronteira Oeste region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Phenology and thermal accumulation in grapevines in the Fronteira Oeste region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Tomazetti, Tiago Camponogara Vitis vinifera; plant development; degree‑day; thermal time; temperature; viticulture Vitis vinifera; desenvolvimento vegetal; graus‑dia; soma térmica; temperatura; viticultura |
title_short |
Phenology and thermal accumulation in grapevines in the Fronteira Oeste region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil |
title_full |
Phenology and thermal accumulation in grapevines in the Fronteira Oeste region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Phenology and thermal accumulation in grapevines in the Fronteira Oeste region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Phenology and thermal accumulation in grapevines in the Fronteira Oeste region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil |
title_sort |
Phenology and thermal accumulation in grapevines in the Fronteira Oeste region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil |
author |
Tomazetti, Tiago Camponogara |
author_facet |
Tomazetti, Tiago Camponogara Rossarolla, Márcia Denise Zeist, André Ricardo Giacobbo, Clevison Luiz Welter, Leocir José Alberto, Cleber Maus |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rossarolla, Márcia Denise Zeist, André Ricardo Giacobbo, Clevison Luiz Welter, Leocir José Alberto, Cleber Maus |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tomazetti, Tiago Camponogara Rossarolla, Márcia Denise Zeist, André Ricardo Giacobbo, Clevison Luiz Welter, Leocir José Alberto, Cleber Maus |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Vitis vinifera; plant development; degree‑day; thermal time; temperature; viticulture Vitis vinifera; desenvolvimento vegetal; graus‑dia; soma térmica; temperatura; viticultura |
topic |
Vitis vinifera; plant development; degree‑day; thermal time; temperature; viticulture Vitis vinifera; desenvolvimento vegetal; graus‑dia; soma térmica; temperatura; viticultura |
description |
The objective of this work was to evaluate the thermal requirement, obtained by different thermal time calculation methods, to characterize the grapevine (Vitis vinifera) phenology of 'Cabernet Sauvignon', 'Tannat', 'Ruby Cabernet', and 'Merlot' grown in the Fronteira Oeste region, of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The phenological development was followed for five seasons – 2005/2006 to 2009/2010. Minimum and maximum air temperatures were recorded daily, and the following eight thermal time methods were tested: M1.1, M1.2, and M1.3, which use only the down threshold temperature (10°C); M2.1 and M2.2, which also consider 25°C as the optimum temperature for development; and M3.1, M3.2, and M3.3, which, besides using the prior temperatures, consider 35°C as the upper threshold temperature of development. These methods were compared using the standard error (SE) estimates of accumulated heat. The SNK test was used to compare the thermal requirement between cultivars. M3.3 was the method that best simulated 'Tannat' and 'Merlot' development (1,823.1 and 1,780.8 degree‑day respectively). However, the least deviation was obtained in 'Cabernet Sauvignon' and 'Ruby Cabernet' using the M3.1 method (1,958.9 and 1,944.8 degree‑ day respectively). Methods employing the three cardinal temperatures showed greater accuracy. 'Tannat' and 'Merlot' are the cultivars that show the lowest thermal requirement to complete the cycle. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-09 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/21331 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/21331 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/21331/13117 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2015 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2015 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.50, n.11, nov. 2015; 1033-1041 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.50, n.11, nov. 2015; 1033-1041 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416672283983872 |