Influence of rootstocks on scion growth of rubber tree in São Paulo State, Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2000 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5955 |
Resumo: | This paper was established in the experimental fields of Estação Experimental de Agronomia de Pindorama, SP, Brazil, in order to evaluate rootstocks vs. scion interaction in rubber tree, Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. ex Adr de Juss.) Müell. Arg. The clones involved were: IAN 873, RRIM 600, RRIM 701, PB 235, PR 107 and GT 1 grafted in six different rootstocks from illegitimate seeds of the clones IAN 873, RRIM 600, RRIM 701, PB 235, GT 1 and from unselected seeds. The lay out used was that of randomized blocks in split-splot design, with four replications. The outcome has shown that in the evaluation period the GT 1 and IAN 873 rootstocks were the ones which produced the mayor girth per plant, being 10.20% larger than that of unselected seeds. At the same time the clones studied pointed out that PB 235, RRIM 600 and PR 107 had a better achievement with an increase of 8.12% in the stem girth compared with RRIM 701 and GT 1 clones that had the worst development. The interaction rootstocks vs. scion was not significant. |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_f55d5175becc7529eee4380ba9606f62 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/5955 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Influence of rootstocks on scion growth of rubber tree in São Paulo State, BrazilInfluência de porta-enxertos no crescimento de clones de seringueira no Estado de São PauloHevea brasiliensis; cloning; vegetative propagation; graft compatibility; seed vigorHevea brasiliensis; clonagem; propagação vegetativa; compatibilidade do enxerto; vigor de sementeThis paper was established in the experimental fields of Estação Experimental de Agronomia de Pindorama, SP, Brazil, in order to evaluate rootstocks vs. scion interaction in rubber tree, Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. ex Adr de Juss.) Müell. Arg. The clones involved were: IAN 873, RRIM 600, RRIM 701, PB 235, PR 107 and GT 1 grafted in six different rootstocks from illegitimate seeds of the clones IAN 873, RRIM 600, RRIM 701, PB 235, GT 1 and from unselected seeds. The lay out used was that of randomized blocks in split-splot design, with four replications. The outcome has shown that in the evaluation period the GT 1 and IAN 873 rootstocks were the ones which produced the mayor girth per plant, being 10.20% larger than that of unselected seeds. At the same time the clones studied pointed out that PB 235, RRIM 600 and PR 107 had a better achievement with an increase of 8.12% in the stem girth compared with RRIM 701 and GT 1 clones that had the worst development. The interaction rootstocks vs. scion was not significant.Este trabalho foi instalado na Estação Experimental de Agronomia de Pindorama, SP, com a finalidade de avaliar a interação enxerto vs. porta-enxertos de seringueira, Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. ex Adr. de Juss.) Müell. Arg. Os clones utilizados foram IAN 873, RRIM 600, RRIM 701, PB 235, PR 107 e GT 1, enxertados em seis diferentes porta-enxertos provenientes de sementes ilegítimas dos clones IAN 873, RRIM 600, RRIM 701, PB 235, GT 1 e de sementes não selecionadas. O delineamento utilizado foi o de blocos ao acaso, com parcelas subdivididas, tendo os porta-enxertos como tratamentos e os clones (enxertos) como subtratamentos, em quatro repetições. Os resultados mostram que no período de avaliação o porta-enxerto GT 1 e IAN 873 foram os que produziram os maiores perímetros por planta, sendo 10,20 % maior que o de sementes não selecionadas. Paralelamente, os enxertos em vigor mostraram que os clones PB 235, RRIM 600 e PR 107 apresentaram melhor desempenho, com um perímetro do caule 8,12% maior que o dos clones RRIM 701 e GT 1, notadamente os de menor vigor. A interação enxerto vs. porta-enxerto não foi significativa.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraMartins, Antonio Lucio MelloRamos, Nilza PatriciaGonçalves, Paulo de SouzaVal, Katia Scott do2000-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5955Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.35, n.9, set. 2000; 1743-1750Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.35, n.9, set. 2000; 1743-17501678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5955/3059info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-08-19T19:26:51Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/5955Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-08-19T19:26:51Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Influence of rootstocks on scion growth of rubber tree in São Paulo State, Brazil Influência de porta-enxertos no crescimento de clones de seringueira no Estado de São Paulo |
title |
Influence of rootstocks on scion growth of rubber tree in São Paulo State, Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Influence of rootstocks on scion growth of rubber tree in São Paulo State, Brazil Martins, Antonio Lucio Mello Hevea brasiliensis; cloning; vegetative propagation; graft compatibility; seed vigor Hevea brasiliensis; clonagem; propagação vegetativa; compatibilidade do enxerto; vigor de semente |
title_short |
Influence of rootstocks on scion growth of rubber tree in São Paulo State, Brazil |
title_full |
Influence of rootstocks on scion growth of rubber tree in São Paulo State, Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Influence of rootstocks on scion growth of rubber tree in São Paulo State, Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of rootstocks on scion growth of rubber tree in São Paulo State, Brazil |
title_sort |
Influence of rootstocks on scion growth of rubber tree in São Paulo State, Brazil |
author |
Martins, Antonio Lucio Mello |
author_facet |
Martins, Antonio Lucio Mello Ramos, Nilza Patricia Gonçalves, Paulo de Souza Val, Katia Scott do |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ramos, Nilza Patricia Gonçalves, Paulo de Souza Val, Katia Scott do |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Martins, Antonio Lucio Mello Ramos, Nilza Patricia Gonçalves, Paulo de Souza Val, Katia Scott do |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Hevea brasiliensis; cloning; vegetative propagation; graft compatibility; seed vigor Hevea brasiliensis; clonagem; propagação vegetativa; compatibilidade do enxerto; vigor de semente |
topic |
Hevea brasiliensis; cloning; vegetative propagation; graft compatibility; seed vigor Hevea brasiliensis; clonagem; propagação vegetativa; compatibilidade do enxerto; vigor de semente |
description |
This paper was established in the experimental fields of Estação Experimental de Agronomia de Pindorama, SP, Brazil, in order to evaluate rootstocks vs. scion interaction in rubber tree, Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. ex Adr de Juss.) Müell. Arg. The clones involved were: IAN 873, RRIM 600, RRIM 701, PB 235, PR 107 and GT 1 grafted in six different rootstocks from illegitimate seeds of the clones IAN 873, RRIM 600, RRIM 701, PB 235, GT 1 and from unselected seeds. The lay out used was that of randomized blocks in split-splot design, with four replications. The outcome has shown that in the evaluation period the GT 1 and IAN 873 rootstocks were the ones which produced the mayor girth per plant, being 10.20% larger than that of unselected seeds. At the same time the clones studied pointed out that PB 235, RRIM 600 and PR 107 had a better achievement with an increase of 8.12% in the stem girth compared with RRIM 701 and GT 1 clones that had the worst development. The interaction rootstocks vs. scion was not significant. |
publishDate |
2000 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2000-09-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5955 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5955 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/5955/3059 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.35, n.9, set. 2000; 1743-1750 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.35, n.9, set. 2000; 1743-1750 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416714985144320 |