Colonizer vegetation structure in gravel mining degraded environment in Diamantina, MG, Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Israel Marinho
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Gonzaga, Anne Priscila Dias, Machado, Evandro Luiz Mendonça, Oliveira, Marcio Leles Romarco, Marques, Izabel Cristina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/769
Resumo: This work aimed at identifying and quantifying colonizer species and structure in gravel mining degraded environment and to identify species for restoration. It was selected three sites characterized as: site 1 (S1), place with less intense history of use; site 2 (S2), intermediary level of degradation; and site 3 (S3), with higher degradation. Within the three sites it was withdrawn 20 plots of 25 m². Within each plot, species with height ≥ 0.10 m and DNS ≤ 5.0 cm were sampled. It was calculated Shannon’s diversity (H’), Pielou’s equability (J’), Jaccard’s and Czekanowski’s similarity indices, as well as the phytosociology parameters, besides the analysis of indicator species. Thirty-two species and 15 families were registered. S1 was the most species-rich, with the highest density, while S2 presented the lowest richness and density. The sites showed low floristic and structural similarity and statistical differences regarding density, (it was found 844, 270 and 497 individuals in, sites A1, A2 and A3, respectively). Diversity varied from 1,680 to 2,074 nats.individual-1. Probably, these divergences are due to the environment variations imposed by the different degradation intensities.
id EMBRAPA-5_94de6807110d065945c673866e90806e
oai_identifier_str oai:pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb:article/769
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-5
network_name_str Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Colonizer vegetation structure in gravel mining degraded environment in Diamantina, MG, BrazilEstrutura da vegetação colonizadora em ambiente degradado por extração de cascalho em Diamantina, MGAdaptações ambientaisHistórico de degradaçãoSucessão ecológicaEnvironmental adaptationsHistory of degradationEcological successionThis work aimed at identifying and quantifying colonizer species and structure in gravel mining degraded environment and to identify species for restoration. It was selected three sites characterized as: site 1 (S1), place with less intense history of use; site 2 (S2), intermediary level of degradation; and site 3 (S3), with higher degradation. Within the three sites it was withdrawn 20 plots of 25 m². Within each plot, species with height ≥ 0.10 m and DNS ≤ 5.0 cm were sampled. It was calculated Shannon’s diversity (H’), Pielou’s equability (J’), Jaccard’s and Czekanowski’s similarity indices, as well as the phytosociology parameters, besides the analysis of indicator species. Thirty-two species and 15 families were registered. S1 was the most species-rich, with the highest density, while S2 presented the lowest richness and density. The sites showed low floristic and structural similarity and statistical differences regarding density, (it was found 844, 270 and 497 individuals in, sites A1, A2 and A3, respectively). Diversity varied from 1,680 to 2,074 nats.individual-1. Probably, these divergences are due to the environment variations imposed by the different degradation intensities.Este trabalho procurou identificar e quantificar espécies colonizadoras e estrutura em área de empréstimo, assim como listar espécies para recuperação de áreas degradadas. Foram selecionados três ambientes, sendo o ambiente 1 (A1) com histórico de uso menos intenso; ambiente 2 (A2) nível de degradação intermediário e ambiente 3 (A3) com maior degradação. Nos três ambientes foram sorteadas 20 parcelas de 25 m2. Nestas, foram amostrados todos os indivíduos com altura ≥ 0,10 m e DAS ≤ 5,0 cm. Foram calculados os índices de diversidade de Shannon (H’), equabilidade de Pielou (J’), similaridade de Jaccard e Czekanowski, assim como os parâmetros fitossiológicos e a análise de espécies indicadoras. Foram registradas 32 espécies pertencentes a 15 famílias. O ambiente A1 foi o mais rico em espécies e com maior densidade e A2 apresentou a menor riqueza e densidade. Os ambientes apresentaram baixa similaridade florística e estrutural, sendo observadas diferenças estatísticas para a densidade (sendo encontrados 844, 270 e 497 indivíduos em A1, A2 e A3, respectivamente) e diversidade que variou entre 1,680 a 2,074 nats.indivíduo-1. Provavelmente, estas divergências se devem às variações do ambiente impostas pelas diferentes intensidades de degradação.Embrapa Florestas2015-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/76910.4336/2015.pfb.35.82.769Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; v. 35 n. 82 (2015): abr./jun.; 77-88Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; Vol. 35 No. 82 (2015): abr./jun.; 77-881983-26051809-3647reponame:Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/769/411Copyright (c) 2015 Israel Marinho Pereira, Anne Priscila Dias Gonzaga, Evandro Luiz Mendonça Machado, Marcio Leles Romarco Oliveira, Izabel Cristina Marqueshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPereira, Israel MarinhoGonzaga, Anne Priscila DiasMachado, Evandro Luiz MendonçaOliveira, Marcio Leles RomarcoMarques, Izabel Cristina2017-04-28T12:44:45Zoai:pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb:article/769Revistahttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/PUBhttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/oaipfb@embrapa.br || revista.pfb@gmail.com || patricia.mattos@embrapa.br1983-26051809-3647opendoar:2017-04-28T12:44:45Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Colonizer vegetation structure in gravel mining degraded environment in Diamantina, MG, Brazil
Estrutura da vegetação colonizadora em ambiente degradado por extração de cascalho em Diamantina, MG
title Colonizer vegetation structure in gravel mining degraded environment in Diamantina, MG, Brazil
spellingShingle Colonizer vegetation structure in gravel mining degraded environment in Diamantina, MG, Brazil
Pereira, Israel Marinho
Adaptações ambientais
Histórico de degradação
Sucessão ecológica
Environmental adaptations
History of degradation
Ecological succession
title_short Colonizer vegetation structure in gravel mining degraded environment in Diamantina, MG, Brazil
title_full Colonizer vegetation structure in gravel mining degraded environment in Diamantina, MG, Brazil
title_fullStr Colonizer vegetation structure in gravel mining degraded environment in Diamantina, MG, Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Colonizer vegetation structure in gravel mining degraded environment in Diamantina, MG, Brazil
title_sort Colonizer vegetation structure in gravel mining degraded environment in Diamantina, MG, Brazil
author Pereira, Israel Marinho
author_facet Pereira, Israel Marinho
Gonzaga, Anne Priscila Dias
Machado, Evandro Luiz Mendonça
Oliveira, Marcio Leles Romarco
Marques, Izabel Cristina
author_role author
author2 Gonzaga, Anne Priscila Dias
Machado, Evandro Luiz Mendonça
Oliveira, Marcio Leles Romarco
Marques, Izabel Cristina
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Israel Marinho
Gonzaga, Anne Priscila Dias
Machado, Evandro Luiz Mendonça
Oliveira, Marcio Leles Romarco
Marques, Izabel Cristina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Adaptações ambientais
Histórico de degradação
Sucessão ecológica
Environmental adaptations
History of degradation
Ecological succession
topic Adaptações ambientais
Histórico de degradação
Sucessão ecológica
Environmental adaptations
History of degradation
Ecological succession
description This work aimed at identifying and quantifying colonizer species and structure in gravel mining degraded environment and to identify species for restoration. It was selected three sites characterized as: site 1 (S1), place with less intense history of use; site 2 (S2), intermediary level of degradation; and site 3 (S3), with higher degradation. Within the three sites it was withdrawn 20 plots of 25 m². Within each plot, species with height ≥ 0.10 m and DNS ≤ 5.0 cm were sampled. It was calculated Shannon’s diversity (H’), Pielou’s equability (J’), Jaccard’s and Czekanowski’s similarity indices, as well as the phytosociology parameters, besides the analysis of indicator species. Thirty-two species and 15 families were registered. S1 was the most species-rich, with the highest density, while S2 presented the lowest richness and density. The sites showed low floristic and structural similarity and statistical differences regarding density, (it was found 844, 270 and 497 individuals in, sites A1, A2 and A3, respectively). Diversity varied from 1,680 to 2,074 nats.individual-1. Probably, these divergences are due to the environment variations imposed by the different degradation intensities.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/769
10.4336/2015.pfb.35.82.769
url https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/769
identifier_str_mv 10.4336/2015.pfb.35.82.769
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/769/411
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Embrapa Florestas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Embrapa Florestas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; v. 35 n. 82 (2015): abr./jun.; 77-88
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; Vol. 35 No. 82 (2015): abr./jun.; 77-88
1983-2605
1809-3647
reponame:Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pfb@embrapa.br || revista.pfb@gmail.com || patricia.mattos@embrapa.br
_version_ 1783370935158439936