Selection of Fungicides for Control of Eucalypt Powdery Mildew
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/234 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to find effective fungicides against eucalypt powdery mildew. Fungicides tested were chlorothalonil, fenarimol, sulfur, tebuconazole, propiconazole, benzothiazole, pyraclostrobin + epoxiconazole and triadimenol. These fungicides were sprayed on Eucalyptus benthamii seedlings in a greenhouse infested with powdery mildew. Severity was evaluated at 9, 16, 23, 30 and 37 days after spraying, classifying symptoms observed with a scale 0 (symptoms absent) to 4 (strong symptoms). Best treatments were obtained with pyraclostrobin + epoxiconazole, propiconazole + trifloxystrobin and triadimenol, with an infection index average of 0.39, 0.63 and 1.01, respectively. |
id |
EMBRAPA-5_cdf60cede74fef7066668b42b0af9765 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb:article/234 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-5 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Selection of Fungicides for Control of Eucalypt Powdery MildewSeleção de Fungicidas para Controle de Oídio em EucaliptoChemical controldiseaseEucalyptus benthamiicontrole químicodoençaEucalyptus benthamii. 1The objective of this study was to find effective fungicides against eucalypt powdery mildew. Fungicides tested were chlorothalonil, fenarimol, sulfur, tebuconazole, propiconazole, benzothiazole, pyraclostrobin + epoxiconazole and triadimenol. These fungicides were sprayed on Eucalyptus benthamii seedlings in a greenhouse infested with powdery mildew. Severity was evaluated at 9, 16, 23, 30 and 37 days after spraying, classifying symptoms observed with a scale 0 (symptoms absent) to 4 (strong symptoms). Best treatments were obtained with pyraclostrobin + epoxiconazole, propiconazole + trifloxystrobin and triadimenol, with an infection index average of 0.39, 0.63 and 1.01, respectively.O objetivo deste estudo foi encontrar fungicidas eficientes contra o oídio do eucalipto. Foram testados os fungicidas chlorothalonil (2 g/l), fenarimol (0,5 ml/l), enxofre (3 g/l), tebuconazole (1 ml/l), propiconazol 12,5% + trifloxistrobina 12,5% (0,6 ml/l), benzothiadiazol (1g/l), piraclostrobina 13,3% + epoxiconazol 5% (1ml/l) e triadimenol (1 ml/l). Os fungicidas foram pulverizados em 30 mudas por tratamento de Eucalyptus benthamii, naturalmente infectadas. A doença foi avaliada aos 9, 16, 23, 30 e 37 dias após serem colocadas em um ambiente infectado, onde os sintomas foram classificados em uma escala de notas que variam de 0 (ausência de sintomas) a 4 (sintoma muito forte). Os melhores tratamentos foram piraclostrobina + epoxiconazol, propiconazol + trifloxistrobina e triadimenol, apresentando um índice médio de infecção de 0,39 e 0,63 e 1,01, respectivamente. Embrapa Florestas2011-03-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/234Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; n. 51 (2005): jul./dez.; 165Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; No. 51 (2005): jul./dez.; 1651983-26051809-3647reponame:Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/234/185Bizi, Rafaela MazurGrigoletti Júnior, Albino GarciaAuer, Celso Garciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-04-28T14:11:52Zoai:pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb:article/234Revistahttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/PUBhttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/oaipfb@embrapa.br || revista.pfb@gmail.com || patricia.mattos@embrapa.br1983-26051809-3647opendoar:2017-04-28T14:11:52Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Selection of Fungicides for Control of Eucalypt Powdery Mildew Seleção de Fungicidas para Controle de Oídio em Eucalipto |
title |
Selection of Fungicides for Control of Eucalypt Powdery Mildew |
spellingShingle |
Selection of Fungicides for Control of Eucalypt Powdery Mildew Bizi, Rafaela Mazur Chemical control disease Eucalyptus benthamii controle químico doença Eucalyptus benthamii. 1 |
title_short |
Selection of Fungicides for Control of Eucalypt Powdery Mildew |
title_full |
Selection of Fungicides for Control of Eucalypt Powdery Mildew |
title_fullStr |
Selection of Fungicides for Control of Eucalypt Powdery Mildew |
title_full_unstemmed |
Selection of Fungicides for Control of Eucalypt Powdery Mildew |
title_sort |
Selection of Fungicides for Control of Eucalypt Powdery Mildew |
author |
Bizi, Rafaela Mazur |
author_facet |
Bizi, Rafaela Mazur Grigoletti Júnior, Albino Garcia Auer, Celso Garcia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Grigoletti Júnior, Albino Garcia Auer, Celso Garcia |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bizi, Rafaela Mazur Grigoletti Júnior, Albino Garcia Auer, Celso Garcia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Chemical control disease Eucalyptus benthamii controle químico doença Eucalyptus benthamii. 1 |
topic |
Chemical control disease Eucalyptus benthamii controle químico doença Eucalyptus benthamii. 1 |
description |
The objective of this study was to find effective fungicides against eucalypt powdery mildew. Fungicides tested were chlorothalonil, fenarimol, sulfur, tebuconazole, propiconazole, benzothiazole, pyraclostrobin + epoxiconazole and triadimenol. These fungicides were sprayed on Eucalyptus benthamii seedlings in a greenhouse infested with powdery mildew. Severity was evaluated at 9, 16, 23, 30 and 37 days after spraying, classifying symptoms observed with a scale 0 (symptoms absent) to 4 (strong symptoms). Best treatments were obtained with pyraclostrobin + epoxiconazole, propiconazole + trifloxystrobin and triadimenol, with an infection index average of 0.39, 0.63 and 1.01, respectively. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-03-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/234 |
url |
https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/234 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/234/185 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Embrapa Florestas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Embrapa Florestas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; n. 51 (2005): jul./dez.; 165 Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; No. 51 (2005): jul./dez.; 165 1983-2605 1809-3647 reponame:Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pfb@embrapa.br || revista.pfb@gmail.com || patricia.mattos@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1783370933137833984 |