Effect of different methods of soil preparation on soil moisture loss, weed growth and soil resistance to penetration.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1988 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/132288 |
Resumo: | The effect of different methods of soil preparation on soil moisture loss, weed growth and soil resistance to penetration has been quantified for the Latosols of Bebedouro experiment station of CPATSA-EMBRAPA, Petrolina,PE, Brazil. The methods studied are manual preparation, preparation by animal drawn wheeled tool carrier and tractorized implements. The drying characteristics of three fields with different soil physical properties were studied prior to conducting the experiment. The different methods of soil preparation caused the soil moisture loss differently. The plot prepared by animal drawn tool carrier retained more moisture for longer time even at deeper layers. The soil resistance to penetration on the surface increased with time with little variation at deeper layers. |
id |
EMBR_091a54b69fb4f879e088f6853d305189 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/132288 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBR |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository_id_str |
2154 |
spelling |
Effect of different methods of soil preparation on soil moisture loss, weed growth and soil resistance to penetration.CaracteristicaErvaPower machineryCharacteristicWeedSoloEmergênciaIrrigaçãoMecanização AgrícolaUmidadeirrigationsoilThe effect of different methods of soil preparation on soil moisture loss, weed growth and soil resistance to penetration has been quantified for the Latosols of Bebedouro experiment station of CPATSA-EMBRAPA, Petrolina,PE, Brazil. The methods studied are manual preparation, preparation by animal drawn wheeled tool carrier and tractorized implements. The drying characteristics of three fields with different soil physical properties were studied prior to conducting the experiment. The different methods of soil preparation caused the soil moisture loss differently. The plot prepared by animal drawn tool carrier retained more moisture for longer time even at deeper layers. The soil resistance to penetration on the surface increased with time with little variation at deeper layers.HARBANS LAL, CPATSA - Consultor.LAL, H.2016-06-01T09:55:16Z2016-06-01T09:55:16Z1996-07-0419882016-06-01T09:55:16Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlePesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 23, n. 8, p. 919-926, ago. 1988.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/132288enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2017-08-16T03:25:20Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/132288Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542017-08-16T03:25:20falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542017-08-16T03:25:20Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of different methods of soil preparation on soil moisture loss, weed growth and soil resistance to penetration. |
title |
Effect of different methods of soil preparation on soil moisture loss, weed growth and soil resistance to penetration. |
spellingShingle |
Effect of different methods of soil preparation on soil moisture loss, weed growth and soil resistance to penetration. LAL, H. Caracteristica Erva Power machinery Characteristic Weed Solo Emergência Irrigação Mecanização Agrícola Umidade irrigation soil |
title_short |
Effect of different methods of soil preparation on soil moisture loss, weed growth and soil resistance to penetration. |
title_full |
Effect of different methods of soil preparation on soil moisture loss, weed growth and soil resistance to penetration. |
title_fullStr |
Effect of different methods of soil preparation on soil moisture loss, weed growth and soil resistance to penetration. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of different methods of soil preparation on soil moisture loss, weed growth and soil resistance to penetration. |
title_sort |
Effect of different methods of soil preparation on soil moisture loss, weed growth and soil resistance to penetration. |
author |
LAL, H. |
author_facet |
LAL, H. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
HARBANS LAL, CPATSA - Consultor. |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
LAL, H. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Caracteristica Erva Power machinery Characteristic Weed Solo Emergência Irrigação Mecanização Agrícola Umidade irrigation soil |
topic |
Caracteristica Erva Power machinery Characteristic Weed Solo Emergência Irrigação Mecanização Agrícola Umidade irrigation soil |
description |
The effect of different methods of soil preparation on soil moisture loss, weed growth and soil resistance to penetration has been quantified for the Latosols of Bebedouro experiment station of CPATSA-EMBRAPA, Petrolina,PE, Brazil. The methods studied are manual preparation, preparation by animal drawn wheeled tool carrier and tractorized implements. The drying characteristics of three fields with different soil physical properties were studied prior to conducting the experiment. The different methods of soil preparation caused the soil moisture loss differently. The plot prepared by animal drawn tool carrier retained more moisture for longer time even at deeper layers. The soil resistance to penetration on the surface increased with time with little variation at deeper layers. |
publishDate |
1988 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1988 1996-07-04 2016-06-01T09:55:16Z 2016-06-01T09:55:16Z 2016-06-01T09:55:16Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 23, n. 8, p. 919-926, ago. 1988. http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/132288 |
identifier_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 23, n. 8, p. 919-926, ago. 1988. |
url |
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/132288 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cg-riaa@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1794503421718429696 |