Ecotechnologies for aquaculture wastewater treatment in a water-scarce region.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1161353 https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4324-2024220827 |
Resumo: | In aquaculture, biological treatments usually have an excellent benefit-cost ratio. This study evaluated the efficiency of different ecotechnologies on aquaculture wastewater treatment. Two experimental units were installed. In the first one, tanks were individually vegetated with free-floating aquatic macrophytes. In the second experimental unit, 10.72 m² of artificial substrate were added for periphyton colonization. The hydraulic retention time of the wastewater was of 30 days. Both physical and chemical characterizations of the effluent were carried out at the beginning and at the end of the experiment. The periphyton community attached to the substrate was catalogued. In the first unit, the pH, nitrite, and orthophosphate values were significantly different. The tanks vegetated with Azolla filiculoides were the only ones where the electrical conductivity values were reduced. Tanks vegetated with Azolla filiculoides and Pontederia crassipes presented decreased the nitrate concentration. On the other hand, the concentration of ammonia and total phosphorus decreased in all vegetated tanks. In the second unit, only the nitrate and ammonia values did not decrease in the last day of the experiment. 33 taxa belonging to the classes Cyanophyceae, Chlorophyceae, Bacillariophyceae, Trebouxiophyceae, Coleochaetophyceae, Coscinodiscophyceae and Zygnematophyceae were identified in the substrate. The experimental units were effective in mitigating the nutrients in aquaculture wastewater that cause eutrophication. |
id |
EMBR_1485e0ecc585e9de8d350fc1774e28c3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1161353 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBR |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository_id_str |
2154 |
spelling |
Ecotechnologies for aquaculture wastewater treatment in a water-scarce region.Escassez de águaComunidade aquáticaBiorremediaçãoProcesso de fitorremediaçãoRegião semiáridaÁguaTratamento da ÁguaÁguas ResiduaisAquiculturaEutrofizaçãoPisciculturaAquacultureWastewaterWastewater aquacultureWastewater treatmentBioremediationEutrophicationPhytoremediationIn aquaculture, biological treatments usually have an excellent benefit-cost ratio. This study evaluated the efficiency of different ecotechnologies on aquaculture wastewater treatment. Two experimental units were installed. In the first one, tanks were individually vegetated with free-floating aquatic macrophytes. In the second experimental unit, 10.72 m² of artificial substrate were added for periphyton colonization. The hydraulic retention time of the wastewater was of 30 days. Both physical and chemical characterizations of the effluent were carried out at the beginning and at the end of the experiment. The periphyton community attached to the substrate was catalogued. In the first unit, the pH, nitrite, and orthophosphate values were significantly different. The tanks vegetated with Azolla filiculoides were the only ones where the electrical conductivity values were reduced. Tanks vegetated with Azolla filiculoides and Pontederia crassipes presented decreased the nitrate concentration. On the other hand, the concentration of ammonia and total phosphorus decreased in all vegetated tanks. In the second unit, only the nitrate and ammonia values did not decrease in the last day of the experiment. 33 taxa belonging to the classes Cyanophyceae, Chlorophyceae, Bacillariophyceae, Trebouxiophyceae, Coleochaetophyceae, Coscinodiscophyceae and Zygnematophyceae were identified in the substrate. The experimental units were effective in mitigating the nutrients in aquaculture wastewater that cause eutrophication.AUGUSTO CÉSAR CAVALCANTI GOMES, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; ALINEAUREA FLORENTINO SILVA, CPATSA; MARIA CAROLINA TONIZZA PEREIRA, UNIVASF.GOMES, A. C. C.SILVA, A. F.PEREIRA, M. C. T.2024-01-26T14:32:33Z2024-01-26T14:32:33Z2024-01-262024info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleBrazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, v. 67, e24220827, 2024.1678-4324http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1161353https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4324-2024220827enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2024-01-26T14:32:33Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1161353Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542024-01-26T14:32:33falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542024-01-26T14:32:33Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ecotechnologies for aquaculture wastewater treatment in a water-scarce region. |
title |
Ecotechnologies for aquaculture wastewater treatment in a water-scarce region. |
spellingShingle |
Ecotechnologies for aquaculture wastewater treatment in a water-scarce region. GOMES, A. C. C. Escassez de água Comunidade aquática Biorremediação Processo de fitorremediação Região semiárida Água Tratamento da Água Águas Residuais Aquicultura Eutrofização Piscicultura Aquaculture Wastewater Wastewater aquaculture Wastewater treatment Bioremediation Eutrophication Phytoremediation |
title_short |
Ecotechnologies for aquaculture wastewater treatment in a water-scarce region. |
title_full |
Ecotechnologies for aquaculture wastewater treatment in a water-scarce region. |
title_fullStr |
Ecotechnologies for aquaculture wastewater treatment in a water-scarce region. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ecotechnologies for aquaculture wastewater treatment in a water-scarce region. |
title_sort |
Ecotechnologies for aquaculture wastewater treatment in a water-scarce region. |
author |
GOMES, A. C. C. |
author_facet |
GOMES, A. C. C. SILVA, A. F. PEREIRA, M. C. T. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
SILVA, A. F. PEREIRA, M. C. T. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
AUGUSTO CÉSAR CAVALCANTI GOMES, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; ALINEAUREA FLORENTINO SILVA, CPATSA; MARIA CAROLINA TONIZZA PEREIRA, UNIVASF. |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
GOMES, A. C. C. SILVA, A. F. PEREIRA, M. C. T. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Escassez de água Comunidade aquática Biorremediação Processo de fitorremediação Região semiárida Água Tratamento da Água Águas Residuais Aquicultura Eutrofização Piscicultura Aquaculture Wastewater Wastewater aquaculture Wastewater treatment Bioremediation Eutrophication Phytoremediation |
topic |
Escassez de água Comunidade aquática Biorremediação Processo de fitorremediação Região semiárida Água Tratamento da Água Águas Residuais Aquicultura Eutrofização Piscicultura Aquaculture Wastewater Wastewater aquaculture Wastewater treatment Bioremediation Eutrophication Phytoremediation |
description |
In aquaculture, biological treatments usually have an excellent benefit-cost ratio. This study evaluated the efficiency of different ecotechnologies on aquaculture wastewater treatment. Two experimental units were installed. In the first one, tanks were individually vegetated with free-floating aquatic macrophytes. In the second experimental unit, 10.72 m² of artificial substrate were added for periphyton colonization. The hydraulic retention time of the wastewater was of 30 days. Both physical and chemical characterizations of the effluent were carried out at the beginning and at the end of the experiment. The periphyton community attached to the substrate was catalogued. In the first unit, the pH, nitrite, and orthophosphate values were significantly different. The tanks vegetated with Azolla filiculoides were the only ones where the electrical conductivity values were reduced. Tanks vegetated with Azolla filiculoides and Pontederia crassipes presented decreased the nitrate concentration. On the other hand, the concentration of ammonia and total phosphorus decreased in all vegetated tanks. In the second unit, only the nitrate and ammonia values did not decrease in the last day of the experiment. 33 taxa belonging to the classes Cyanophyceae, Chlorophyceae, Bacillariophyceae, Trebouxiophyceae, Coleochaetophyceae, Coscinodiscophyceae and Zygnematophyceae were identified in the substrate. The experimental units were effective in mitigating the nutrients in aquaculture wastewater that cause eutrophication. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-01-26T14:32:33Z 2024-01-26T14:32:33Z 2024-01-26 2024 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, v. 67, e24220827, 2024. 1678-4324 http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1161353 https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4324-2024220827 |
identifier_str_mv |
Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, v. 67, e24220827, 2024. 1678-4324 |
url |
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1161353 https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4324-2024220827 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cg-riaa@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1794503556811718656 |