Policies for reintegrating crop and livestock systems: a comparative analysis.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: GARRETT, R. D.
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: NILES, M., GIL, J., DY, P., REIS, J. C. dos, VALENTIM, J. F.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1087334
Resumo: The reintegration of crop and livestock systems within the same land area has the potential to improve soil quality and reduce water and air pollution, while maintaining high yields and reducing risk. In this study, we characterize the degree to which federal policies in three major global food production regions that span a range of socioeconomic contexts, Brazil, New Zealand, and the United States, incentivize or disincentivize the use of integrated crop and livestock practices (ICLS). Our analysis indicates that Brazil and New Zealand have the most favorable policy environment for ICLS, while the United States provides the least favorable environment. The balance of policy incentives and disincentives across our three cases studies mirrors current patterns of ICLS usage. Brazil and New Zealand have both undergone a trend toward mixed crop livestock systems in recent years, while the United States has transitioned rapidly toward continuous crop and livestock production. If transitions to ICLS are desired, particularly in the United States, it will be necessary to change agricultural, trade, environmental, biofuels, and food safety policies that currently buffer farmers from risk, provide too few incentives for pollution reduction, and restrict the presence of animals in crop areas. It will also be necessary to invest more in research and development in all countries to identify the most profitable ICLS technologies in each region.
id EMBR_591c42340f8ff9e01f07ec9dc914060c
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1087334
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Policies for reintegrating crop and livestock systems: a comparative analysis.AgroecologiaIntegração lavoura-pecuária (iLP)Integrated Crop and Livestock Systems (ICLS)Estados UnidosNova ZelândiaBrasilAgricultura sustentablePolítica públicaAgricultura sustentávelEcologia vegetalPolíticas públicasSustainable agricultureAgroecologyPublic policyBrazilUnited StatesNew ZealandThe reintegration of crop and livestock systems within the same land area has the potential to improve soil quality and reduce water and air pollution, while maintaining high yields and reducing risk. In this study, we characterize the degree to which federal policies in three major global food production regions that span a range of socioeconomic contexts, Brazil, New Zealand, and the United States, incentivize or disincentivize the use of integrated crop and livestock practices (ICLS). Our analysis indicates that Brazil and New Zealand have the most favorable policy environment for ICLS, while the United States provides the least favorable environment. The balance of policy incentives and disincentives across our three cases studies mirrors current patterns of ICLS usage. Brazil and New Zealand have both undergone a trend toward mixed crop livestock systems in recent years, while the United States has transitioned rapidly toward continuous crop and livestock production. If transitions to ICLS are desired, particularly in the United States, it will be necessary to change agricultural, trade, environmental, biofuels, and food safety policies that currently buffer farmers from risk, provide too few incentives for pollution reduction, and restrict the presence of animals in crop areas. It will also be necessary to invest more in research and development in all countries to identify the most profitable ICLS technologies in each region.Rachael D. Garrett, Boston University; Meredith Niles, University of Vermont; Juliana Gil, Boston University / Wageningen University; Philip Dy, Harvard University; JULIO CESAR DOS REIS, CPAMT; JUDSON FERREIRA VALENTIM, CPAF-Acre.GARRETT, R. D.NILES, M.GIL, J.DY, P.REIS, J. C. dosVALENTIM, J. F.2018-02-07T23:40:07Z2018-02-07T23:40:07Z2018-02-0720172018-02-07T23:40:07Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleSustainability, Switzerland, v. 9, n. 3, p. 473-494, Mar. 2017.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/108733410.3390/su9030473enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2018-02-07T23:40:14Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1087334Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542018-02-07T23:40:14falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542018-02-07T23:40:14Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Policies for reintegrating crop and livestock systems: a comparative analysis.
title Policies for reintegrating crop and livestock systems: a comparative analysis.
spellingShingle Policies for reintegrating crop and livestock systems: a comparative analysis.
GARRETT, R. D.
Agroecologia
Integração lavoura-pecuária (iLP)
Integrated Crop and Livestock Systems (ICLS)
Estados Unidos
Nova Zelândia
Brasil
Agricultura sustentable
Política pública
Agricultura sustentável
Ecologia vegetal
Políticas públicas
Sustainable agriculture
Agroecology
Public policy
Brazil
United States
New Zealand
title_short Policies for reintegrating crop and livestock systems: a comparative analysis.
title_full Policies for reintegrating crop and livestock systems: a comparative analysis.
title_fullStr Policies for reintegrating crop and livestock systems: a comparative analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Policies for reintegrating crop and livestock systems: a comparative analysis.
title_sort Policies for reintegrating crop and livestock systems: a comparative analysis.
author GARRETT, R. D.
author_facet GARRETT, R. D.
NILES, M.
GIL, J.
DY, P.
REIS, J. C. dos
VALENTIM, J. F.
author_role author
author2 NILES, M.
GIL, J.
DY, P.
REIS, J. C. dos
VALENTIM, J. F.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Rachael D. Garrett, Boston University; Meredith Niles, University of Vermont; Juliana Gil, Boston University / Wageningen University; Philip Dy, Harvard University; JULIO CESAR DOS REIS, CPAMT; JUDSON FERREIRA VALENTIM, CPAF-Acre.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv GARRETT, R. D.
NILES, M.
GIL, J.
DY, P.
REIS, J. C. dos
VALENTIM, J. F.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Agroecologia
Integração lavoura-pecuária (iLP)
Integrated Crop and Livestock Systems (ICLS)
Estados Unidos
Nova Zelândia
Brasil
Agricultura sustentable
Política pública
Agricultura sustentável
Ecologia vegetal
Políticas públicas
Sustainable agriculture
Agroecology
Public policy
Brazil
United States
New Zealand
topic Agroecologia
Integração lavoura-pecuária (iLP)
Integrated Crop and Livestock Systems (ICLS)
Estados Unidos
Nova Zelândia
Brasil
Agricultura sustentable
Política pública
Agricultura sustentável
Ecologia vegetal
Políticas públicas
Sustainable agriculture
Agroecology
Public policy
Brazil
United States
New Zealand
description The reintegration of crop and livestock systems within the same land area has the potential to improve soil quality and reduce water and air pollution, while maintaining high yields and reducing risk. In this study, we characterize the degree to which federal policies in three major global food production regions that span a range of socioeconomic contexts, Brazil, New Zealand, and the United States, incentivize or disincentivize the use of integrated crop and livestock practices (ICLS). Our analysis indicates that Brazil and New Zealand have the most favorable policy environment for ICLS, while the United States provides the least favorable environment. The balance of policy incentives and disincentives across our three cases studies mirrors current patterns of ICLS usage. Brazil and New Zealand have both undergone a trend toward mixed crop livestock systems in recent years, while the United States has transitioned rapidly toward continuous crop and livestock production. If transitions to ICLS are desired, particularly in the United States, it will be necessary to change agricultural, trade, environmental, biofuels, and food safety policies that currently buffer farmers from risk, provide too few incentives for pollution reduction, and restrict the presence of animals in crop areas. It will also be necessary to invest more in research and development in all countries to identify the most profitable ICLS technologies in each region.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2018-02-07T23:40:07Z
2018-02-07T23:40:07Z
2018-02-07
2018-02-07T23:40:07Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Sustainability, Switzerland, v. 9, n. 3, p. 473-494, Mar. 2017.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1087334
10.3390/su9030473
identifier_str_mv Sustainability, Switzerland, v. 9, n. 3, p. 473-494, Mar. 2017.
10.3390/su9030473
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1087334
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503449715408896