Comparing pollination control bag types for sorghum seed harvest.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: SCHAFFERT, R. E.
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: VIRK, D. S., SENIOR, H.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1049300
Resumo: Efficacy of pollination bags made of new nonwoven fabrics was compared with the traditional paper bags in sorghum during 2015 using three cultivars comprising BR007B (red seeded), SC283 (white seeded) and 1167048 hybrid with tannin (brown seeded). The five pollination bag treatments were: no bagging, traditional paper bag, paper bag plus plastic screen bag for extra bird protection, duraweb®SG2 polypropylene bag and duraweb®SG1 polyester bag. There was no bird damage on tannin hybrid but birds damaged bags to access grains of the other two varieties. Varieties and bag types differed significantly, and also showed significant interactions for panicle weight (at P<0.06), seed weight and average seed weight per panicle. The tannin hybrid was consistently a better performer for all traits regardless of bag type. The paper bags were the worst for bird damage. Duraweb® SG1 was the best performer for all traits including bird damage followed by duraweb®SG2. The joint regression analysis showed that BR007B performed consistently under all bag types with average response. On the other hand, SC283 improved its response with the increasing quality of bag type at an above average rate for panicle weight and seed traits. It was concluded that new nonwoven fabric bags could replace paper bags in providing better seed production potential and greater protection against bird damage.
id EMBR_6ff6b23256d1ed11187e6e568fd4a79b
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1049300
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Comparing pollination control bag types for sorghum seed harvest.SorgoPolinizaçãoEfficacy of pollination bags made of new nonwoven fabrics was compared with the traditional paper bags in sorghum during 2015 using three cultivars comprising BR007B (red seeded), SC283 (white seeded) and 1167048 hybrid with tannin (brown seeded). The five pollination bag treatments were: no bagging, traditional paper bag, paper bag plus plastic screen bag for extra bird protection, duraweb®SG2 polypropylene bag and duraweb®SG1 polyester bag. There was no bird damage on tannin hybrid but birds damaged bags to access grains of the other two varieties. Varieties and bag types differed significantly, and also showed significant interactions for panicle weight (at P<0.06), seed weight and average seed weight per panicle. The tannin hybrid was consistently a better performer for all traits regardless of bag type. The paper bags were the worst for bird damage. Duraweb® SG1 was the best performer for all traits including bird damage followed by duraweb®SG2. The joint regression analysis showed that BR007B performed consistently under all bag types with average response. On the other hand, SC283 improved its response with the increasing quality of bag type at an above average rate for panicle weight and seed traits. It was concluded that new nonwoven fabric bags could replace paper bags in providing better seed production potential and greater protection against bird damage.ROBERT EUGENE SCHAFFERT, CNPMS.SCHAFFERT, R. E.VIRK, D. S.SENIOR, H.2016-07-20T11:11:11Z2016-07-20T11:11:11Z2016-07-2020162016-07-21T11:11:11Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, v. 8, n. 8, p. 126-137, Aug. 2016.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/104930010.5897/JPBCS2016.0580enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2017-08-16T01:38:24Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1049300Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542017-08-16T01:38:24falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542017-08-16T01:38:24Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparing pollination control bag types for sorghum seed harvest.
title Comparing pollination control bag types for sorghum seed harvest.
spellingShingle Comparing pollination control bag types for sorghum seed harvest.
SCHAFFERT, R. E.
Sorgo
Polinização
title_short Comparing pollination control bag types for sorghum seed harvest.
title_full Comparing pollination control bag types for sorghum seed harvest.
title_fullStr Comparing pollination control bag types for sorghum seed harvest.
title_full_unstemmed Comparing pollination control bag types for sorghum seed harvest.
title_sort Comparing pollination control bag types for sorghum seed harvest.
author SCHAFFERT, R. E.
author_facet SCHAFFERT, R. E.
VIRK, D. S.
SENIOR, H.
author_role author
author2 VIRK, D. S.
SENIOR, H.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv ROBERT EUGENE SCHAFFERT, CNPMS.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv SCHAFFERT, R. E.
VIRK, D. S.
SENIOR, H.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sorgo
Polinização
topic Sorgo
Polinização
description Efficacy of pollination bags made of new nonwoven fabrics was compared with the traditional paper bags in sorghum during 2015 using three cultivars comprising BR007B (red seeded), SC283 (white seeded) and 1167048 hybrid with tannin (brown seeded). The five pollination bag treatments were: no bagging, traditional paper bag, paper bag plus plastic screen bag for extra bird protection, duraweb®SG2 polypropylene bag and duraweb®SG1 polyester bag. There was no bird damage on tannin hybrid but birds damaged bags to access grains of the other two varieties. Varieties and bag types differed significantly, and also showed significant interactions for panicle weight (at P<0.06), seed weight and average seed weight per panicle. The tannin hybrid was consistently a better performer for all traits regardless of bag type. The paper bags were the worst for bird damage. Duraweb® SG1 was the best performer for all traits including bird damage followed by duraweb®SG2. The joint regression analysis showed that BR007B performed consistently under all bag types with average response. On the other hand, SC283 improved its response with the increasing quality of bag type at an above average rate for panicle weight and seed traits. It was concluded that new nonwoven fabric bags could replace paper bags in providing better seed production potential and greater protection against bird damage.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-07-20T11:11:11Z
2016-07-20T11:11:11Z
2016-07-20
2016
2016-07-21T11:11:11Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, v. 8, n. 8, p. 126-137, Aug. 2016.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1049300
10.5897/JPBCS2016.0580
identifier_str_mv Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, v. 8, n. 8, p. 126-137, Aug. 2016.
10.5897/JPBCS2016.0580
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1049300
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503424253886464